Aren't Stacy and Ball really good RBs?
What am I missing?
Stacy is solid. Ball is talented.
Id take either, but I prefer Stacy as he had 900+ yards in 2013
Why not?NO interest in Ball or Stacy IMO...Barkley? Maybe
Aren't Stacy and Ball good RBs?
What am I missing?
Edit: Not really good, but good.
Why would Barkley be interesting if Tebow beats him out?
You are not indulging in the fantasy that there are teams that will be cutting starting quality RBs.
Stacy I believe is safe with the Jets. Now, Ball might be in danger. But then again, if he can't hold a third string job in Denver, I fail to see what he could do other than replace Dunbar.
The issue is with our depth that we allow some positions to come with a "template". In other words, the fourth or fifth guy here, needs to do this.
I understand it, but it is a rigid thought process. We certainly believe in tiered depth. All teams do, in a way, but I think we like to assign roles based on the pecking order more than some other teams.
Why would Barkley be interesting if Tebow beats him out?
I can see a trade made by someone for Montee Ball at some point in the next 2 days, I'd give them Hanna for him
Why would Barkley be interesting if Tebow beats him out?
Why would Barkley be interesting if Tebow beats him out?