4-3 Under Defense and do we fit?

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2011/5/31...roll-4-3-under-defense-part-i-an-introduction

Very informative article on the 4-3 Under Defense that was originally crafted by Kiffen. This article demonstrates how Pete Carroll modified it. Marinelli has incorporated some of these changes at times. But as you can see, we don't have the right pieces as of yet to make it work.

The 4-3 Under, in it's simplest terms, is a gap control system meant to stop the run and to pressure the passer. For the most part, each lineman and linebacker is responsible for one gap - this makes each player's responsibility fairly cut and dry and eliminates a lot of the reads and thinking from the game. Now, the 4-3 Under can be run with 2-gapping personnel as well, and that was something that we saw Red Bryant and Colin Cole doing when they were healthy in 2010, but it really depends on if you have the horses to 2-gap or 1-gap in this system.

As a refresher, here is how the gap and defensive alignment system works.



In the late 1980's, Monte Kiffin began coaching for the Minnesota Vikings with a coach named Floyd Peters and they further developed the 4-3 Under that emphasized rushing the passer. The 4-3 Under system uses almost exclusively a staggered alignment to the offense in this basic set.



SAM linebacker - Lined up to the outside shoulder of the tight end off the line of scrimmage a yard or two and is responsible for the D gap (to the outside of the tight end). He's also responsible for running in pass coverage from time to time.
Strongside defensive end - Lined up to the outside shoulder of the tackle, in a 5-technique alignment, and is responsible for the C gap (to the right of the tackle).
Strongside defensive tackle - Usually lined up shading the center in a 1-technique alignment and is responsible for the strongside A gap.
Weakside defensive tackle - Lined up in a 3-technique alignment off the weakside guard and is responsible for the weakside B gap in front of him.
Weakside defensive end - Lined up to the outside shoulder of the weakside offensive tackle and is responsible for the C gap on his side.

This leaves the strongside B gap and the weakside A gap open. These are the responsibilities of the MIKE and WILL linebackers.

The defense that Pete Carroll now employs uses the basic tenets of the Monte Kiffin 4-3 Under defense and mixes in a variation originally pioneered by the legendary George Seifert in San Francisco. Seifert wanted to create mismatches against the opposing offensive line so he started using his weakside defensive end to rove around and rush the passer from a two-point stance (standing up position). This was the beginning of the "Elephant" position and one that Carroll uses today. We also see this position called the LEO, and in the Hawks' defense can rush standing up or in a three-point stance.



It's the same basic alignment but as you can see, the SAM linebacker comes up closer to the line to play hard contain and the weakside LEO is pushed out a bit, maybe a yard off of the weakside tackle. The LEO's main job is to control the C gap while rushing the passer like a wild banshee and the SAM plays contain against the TE, runs in pass coverage with him, or rushes the passer in some situations.

Here is the basic description of each position in the Pete Carroll 4-3 Under.

LEO - Can be a little bit smaller than a normal DE and Pete Carroll tends to like a more athletic and versatile body type for his Elephant position; a guy that can speed rush the QB but also react quick enough to control his gap. Must also be able to drop back into coverage occasionally in zone blitz situations.
Strongside defensive tackle - Can be short and squat but must be able to take on a double team consistently.
Weakside defensive tackle/3-tech - Must be your premiere interior pass rusher and have an explosive first step. His main job is to pressure the QB and stop the run in his weakside B gap.
Strongside defensive end/5-tech - Can be a bigger guy and must be great against the run. This is why you saw Red Bryant move out there in 2010.
SAM linebacker - Needs to be athletic and rangy; great against the run but able to run with tight ends and running backs in pass coverage.
WILL linebacker - Is going to get a lot of tackles and in Pete's system is typically a faster, smaller linebacker with range.
MIKE linebacker - Needs to be the field general; very instinctual and savvy. He needs to be quick enough to drop back down the middle third of the field in pass coverage in the Tampa-2 coverage.
Free safety - A guy that's going to move around a lot and be very instinctual as well. He's going to come up to the line a lot and will get a lot of tackles.
Strong safety - Has to be good against the run but like the free safety, will move around a lot and have to defend against the deep pass a lot. He will need to be fast and have some ball skills.
Cornerbacks - Need to be physical and long. They will get involved in run defense a lot so they must be good tacklers. They are protected over the top a lot of the time so typically they're not all-world defenders but need to be pretty fast.

So why is our defense so bad? We don't have the talent.

LEO - We have no one on this team with the athletic talent to be this guy. Mincey is not even close to this and I have my doubts that Lawrence is explosive enough to be that guy.
Strongside defensive tackle - Hayden does not control nor demand double teams
Weakside defensive tackle/3-tech - Melton has played well, but for whatever reason doesn't seem to be playing a lot. T Crawford has played well there, but I still don't see him as the ideal candidate long term.
Strongside defensive end/5-tech - Selvie is not good vs the run and has disappeared against the pass.
SAM linebacker - Carter doesn't have the heart
WILL linebacker - Hutchins is a rook and may be a step slow for long term
MIKE linebacker - Ro Mac, when healthy, has been a reason why the defense isn't at the very bottom again
Free safety - Church/Wilcox. Church is too slow and Wilcox is not instinctual
Strong safety - See above
Cornerbacks - Carr is not physical. Scandrick is a keeper.

So we need some speed up front, in the middle and at the back end. What I'd like to see next year?

LEO - Lawrence to start, but I'd love to get a draft pick here than can rush the passer
Strongside defensive tackle - Let's see what Brent can bring. Maybe Bishop?
Weakside defensive tackle/3-tech - I'd work with Melton and do a reasonable contract.
Strongside defensive end/5-tech - I still think T Crawford could be this guy
SAM linebacker - Ro Mac if he still wants to play and does so for a reasonable contract
WILL linebacker - Maybe Durrant comes back. He was playing very well. I'd still draft a guy here.
MIKE linebacker - Lee
Free safety - Wilcox
Strong safety - Draft
Cornerbacks - Get rid of Carr.

Going into next year's FA and Draft I'd be looking for the following:
Draft - Pass rushing end, Safety, WILL LB, 3Tech
FA - Corner, 1Tech DT
 

Wolfpack

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,973
That is a great post. Lots of good football knowledge in there.

The Wade 3-4 and Ryan's 3-4 were basically a 4-3 under with Ware as the Elephant so the team HAD the pieces.

The big mismatch is that your 3 tech under tackle is one on one with a guard and your RE /ROLB is also one on one next to him. The current team is struggling to find two players who can consistently win those two match ups.

I still feel that letting Ware go was a mistake, they had no one to hold down that spot consistently.
 

CashMan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
1,175
That is a great post. Lots of good football knowledge in there.

The Wade 3-4 and Ryan's 3-4 were basically a 4-3 under with Ware as the Elephant so the team HAD the pieces.

The big mismatch is that your 3 tech under tackle is one on one with a guard and your RE /ROLB is also one on one next to him. The current team is struggling to find two players who can consistently win those two match ups.

I still feel that letting Ware go was a mistake, they had no one to hold down that spot consistently.

Well, agree and disagree on ware. Short term(1 year) would of been fine, but think about what would happen with this offseason trying to resign people.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,200
Reaction score
64,703
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Good post.

I would be shocked if RoMc plays any position other than MLB.

If they could find a dynamic RDE, then DLaw could play LDE. Mincey has the build of a LDE in this scheme.

RDE: Free Agent (Greg Hardy, Jerry Hughes, Avril, JPP, Sheard, ???)
DT3-tech: Crawford (I'm using money that would have gone to Melton and Carr on a top DE)
DT1-tech: Brent, Bishop as the backup
LDE: DLaw, Mincey

I think the practice reports that Melton is taking practice snaps at LDE probably confirms that Crawford is unlikely to move to LDE.

They have several options as backups at DT3-tech for next season. Okoye, Whaley, Coleman. Mincey might actually be a better situational 3-tech than DE. They could draft one also, especially if they sign a premium RDE.

Carr should be cut. Even if they can't find a decent free agent replacement, I would use the 8M saved and the 9M saved from not signing Melton to get a top RDE. They need to draft a CB even if they sign a free agent to replace Carr.

I'm not convinced that they can't win with Church and Wilcox, but they need to at least add a draft pick at the position. They have no depth.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
Melton at SDE and Brent as a two gap 1T (i.e. Nose tackle) likely put us in a 4-3 under/over.

For next year Crawford is the 3T for sure. He's been playing it about 6 months and is our only bright spot young DL. --to this point.
DLaw is not a SDE but he also might not be ready to start at WDE. Here's where I'd look at someone like Cliff Avril with starting RDE experience.

I think we see one legit FA signing and that guy is a DE.

I think we'll look at R1 or other valuable safeties because it has been great for SF/Sea/ARIZ and other defenses we'd like to emulate.

Sean Lee, McClain, Durant and Hitchens would be an ideal 4some at LB. Work in Will Smith as a ST and back up.
 

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
I think the practice reports that Melton is taking practice snaps at LDE probably confirms that Crawford is unlikely to move to LDE.

http://cover32.com/2014/06/16/top-10-in-2014-the-best-defensive-tackles-in-the-nfl-today/

Take a look at this list. It's pretty good. Top 10 DT. They have Justin Smith listed as a DT, but I believe he's more of a 3-4 5T. But he's the only one in the top 10 that has a similar build to Crawford. And Crawford is no Justin Smith. All the other guys on the list are 6'3" and under and 300+ lbs.

I want size inside. And I want my 4-3 3T to be quick and agile. Give me a guy like Jurrell Casey. 6'1" 305.

And I want size in my Strong Side DE. That's why I think Crawford could flourish there. He's a beast against the run, long and athletic. The pass rush will come.

Then I want a guy like Cameron Wake at WDE. The guy is a monster.

Then find a beast to play the 1Tech. If Brent can get back to where he left off, he could be that guy.
 
Last edited:

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
Melton at SDE and Brent as a two gap 1T (i.e. Nose tackle) likely put us in a 4-3 under/over.

For next year Crawford is the 3T for sure. He's been playing it about 6 months and is our only bright spot young DL. --to this point.
DLaw is not a SDE but he also might not be ready to start at WDE. Here's where I'd look at someone like Cliff Avril with starting RDE experience.

I think we see one legit FA signing and that guy is a DE.

I think we'll look at R1 or other valuable safeties because it has been great for SF/Sea/ARIZ and other defenses we'd like to emulate.

Sean Lee, McClain, Durant and Hitchens would be an ideal 4some at LB. Work in Will Smith as a ST and back up.

FA pass rushers are costly. That's why I'd look to the draft for one.

I'd look to FA for a cheaper replacement for Carr. More of a zone guy that can hit. We still have Scandrick locked up and I think he could be our #1.

Yeah, I'm not sold on Crawford being our 3T. But that's just my opinion.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,942
Reaction score
8,681
I really don't think it matters where you line these guys up right now. There simply isn't enough talent on the defensive side of the field. Crawford is the only guy I've seen win a 1 on 1 with any kind of consistency what so ever. If that doesn't change the scheme doesn't matter.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
Crawford is a fine 3 technique. He consistently gets penetration and wins one on one blocking assignments. Brent has the physical skill to play 1 technique. Unfortunately, there's nothing at defensive end thus far. When Mincey is expected to be the LEO, you've got problems.
 

Wolfpack

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,973
Well, agree and disagree on ware. Short term(1 year) would of been fine, but think about what would happen with this offseason trying to resign people.

I agree on the 1 year only and I think he would have re-signed for a cheaper 10M offer. Poorly handled and thus left with this thin roster.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,200
Reaction score
64,703
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I agree on the 1 year only and I think he would have re-signed for a cheaper 10M offer. Poorly handled and thus left with this thin roster.
They didn't think the defense or the team had much chance to go to the playoffs this year. That seems obvious by the statements Jerry made in the off-season. It was the first time I've ever heard him with low expectations for the upcoming season.

If they were in the mindset that they really had minimal chance to be a playoff team, then keeping Ware and Hatcher and paying them big money would be a waste.

I think they targeted 2015 as the year to go for it and saved money in 2014 to be able to have more options in 2015.

The Option with Ware:
2014 12M
2015 13M

The Option without Ware:
2015: Use the 12M + 13M = 25M on free agents.
 

dguinta1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
239
I so give you X's and O's guys credit, I love the game of football but I can't dive this deep. I am ignorant because it would be great to know more about my fav. sport, being 43. At th least help me play Madden better. :):starspin::starspin::starspin::starspin::starspin:
 

Wolfpack

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,973
They didn't think the defense or the team had much chance to go to the playoffs this year. That seems obvious by the statements Jerry made in the off-season. It was the first time I've ever heard him with low expectations for the upcoming season.

If they were in the mindset that they really had minimal chance to be a playoff team, then keeping Ware and Hatcher and paying them big money would be a waste.

I think they targeted 2015 as the year to go for it and saved money in 2014 to be able to have more options in 2015.

The Option with Ware:
2014 12M
2015 13M

The Option without Ware:
2015: Use the 12M + 13M = 25M on free agents.

I think you are right.

But Ware is on the books for dead money almost as much as if he would have been restructured to play at the 10M he wanted. Lets not take this out of topic with yet another Ware thread but my point was that the team HAD the personal to play the defense and now they do not, by their own choice.
 

CashMan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
1,175
The Option with Ware:
2014 12M
2015 13M

The Option without Ware:
2015: Use the 12M + 13M = 25M on free agents.

I think there might be dead money, that you did not account for. Rarely, have I seem a player get cut, who had a monster deal, and the team could spend 100% of what they were not paying him.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
FA pass rushers are costly. That's why I'd look to the draft for one.

I'd look to FA for a cheaper replacement for Carr. More of a zone guy that can hit. We still have Scandrick locked up and I think he could be our #1.

Yeah, I'm not sold on Crawford being our 3T. But that's just my opinion.

The problem is we won't draft high enough to get a pass rusher that can likely help as a rookie.
Those guys tend to be top 10. Top 15 maybe.
A safety at 25 can be really good and start year 1. A DL is probably gonna need a year or so to get going.

You can't get cheaper than Carr if he restructures because he saves you money.
It costs less on the cap to keep him than cut him so he's basically free.
If we cut him on/after June 1st he eats 4.7m and another 8m next year.
OR we can restructure him down to 1m in base a small bonus of say 2 mil with a 3m base(guaranteed to entice him) for 2016 and extend him 2 fake years.
We'd eat 6-8m for him this year and next which is basically the same thing we'd eat over two years to cut him.

OR they can cut him but eat a lot of money and then hope to find a cheap vet that can play as well.

Crawford has been rated highly by teammates and by PFF. I think he is set. I think we'll draft a young DT anyways but likely round 3-5 area with idea he plays 20 snaps per game as a rookie.

If the Cowboys can string some of these big cap numbers along a bit the new TV contracts should cause the cap to rise a lot once they kick in.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
We don't fit right now because Carr isn't a zone corner and neither is Claiborne. You need guys that can tackle in the zone scheme because the receiver is likely to catch the ball in open space.

We also don't have the DE's for it either.

Not all 4-3 under schemes are exactly alike. In the Marinelli/Kiffin 4-3 under, they want the D-Line to get up field. So, they are more likely to use a smaller, quicker DT in the 1-tech than a gap eating DT in the 1-tech. I think Hayden is more or less a pet cat of Marinelli and Kiffin's mainly because he does hustle on every single play.

I don't think McClain is quite the prototype MLB in this scheme, but doesn't mean he can't be effective.





YR
 

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
The problem is we won't draft high enough to get a pass rusher that can likely help as a rookie.
Those guys tend to be top 10. Top 15 maybe.
A safety at 25 can be really good and start year 1. A DL is probably gonna need a year or so to get going.

I guess it depends on where we will be drafting. I agree that it would be easier to get a safety, but if a pass rusher falls we should be all over him.

You can't get cheaper than Carr if he restructures because he saves you money.
It costs less on the cap to keep him than cut him so he's basically free.
If we cut him on/after June 1st he eats 4.7m and another 8m next year.
OR we can restructure him down to 1m in base a small bonus of say 2 mil with a 3m base(guaranteed to entice him) for 2016 and extend him 2 fake years.
We'd eat 6-8m for him this year and next which is basically the same thing we'd eat over two years to cut him.
OR they can cut him but eat a lot of money and then hope to find a cheap vet that can play as well.

Not sure about the math here. Carr has a dead money figure of $4,717,000 next year. A base of $8,000,000. We could spread that hit out over two years as a June 1st cut. And we would save on his base. So that frees up about 6 mil for 2015 and 2016. Should be enough to get a guy that is much more impactful than Carr.

Crawford has been rated highly by teammates and by PFF. I think he is set. I think we'll draft a young DT anyways but likely round 3-5 area with idea he plays 20 snaps per game as a rookie.

I like Crawford, and he's doing ok at DT. I just don't think he'll hold up there long term and I think we could do better at the position. And I do think he could be a very good strong side end.
 
Top