45 is alot harder than 53

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
After listening to to BP's presser yesterday I decided to try and put together my gameday 45 instead of worrying about the 53 just yet. You really get a new appreciation for some of these players worth when trying to do that and why it's so hard to let some of them go.

Here's my attempt, it's not an easy job.

QB - Bledsoe, Romo

RB - JJ, Barber, Thompson

RB/TE - Polite

TE - Witten, Fasano, Hannam

WR - TO, Glenn, Crayton, Rector

OL - Adams, Columbo, Pettiti ... Gurode, Johnson ... Rivera, Kosier

DL - Canty, Spears, Ratliff, Hatcher ... Ferguson, Pepper

LB - Ellis, Ware, Burnett, Singleton, Boiman ... Ayondele, James, Carp

DB - Newman, Henry, Glenn, Reeves, NJones ... Roy, Watkins, Davis

LS - Lodouceur

P - McBriar

K - Vandy


A couple of the things you begin to notice when putting together the 45 are -

1 - The Power of Versatility -

Simply put the players that have it make themselves alot more valuable and equally as iimportant the ones that don't really pigeon hole themselves. Players like Polite, Gurode, Kosier, Ratliff, Ellis Reeves, and N.Jones double their importance to the team with their abilities to morph easily into other positions. For example Gurodes capabilities at G allow me to keep 7 OL active instead of 8. Some might disagree with the decision to keep Procter inactive. But most coaches like to go with just 7 OLineman if they can get away with it, and we can.


2 - Special Teams Prowess -

When putting together your 45 nothing is as big a pain in your backside as having to make allowances for the guys that make their living on special teams. It's easy to forget the value of a player like Terrance Copper or Rocky Boiman until it's 45 time, but trust me the coaches know. I've got Hurd beating out Copper for a roster spot, but this is not the lock for Hurd some have it pegged as. The problem is I need Rector to return punts for me, so he has to be my 4th receiver. Hurd doesn't give me enough on special teams to justify keeping a 5th WR active and going say one less at LB. Copper would give you more options in that regard. Like I said I have Hurd making the 53 but because of the difficulty in getting him to the 45 w/o an injury it will be a close call.


A couple other noteables in conclussion -

Yeah I know, I didn't include a K/O speciallist. It might be wishful thinking on my part but unless Vandy doesn't kick at all against Minnesota or when he does the ball goes no further than the 10 or 15, I think it's entirely possible we just keep the 1 kicker. This will be one of the bigger things to watch in the game against the Vikes and I think from the coaches standpoint a good performance by Vandy will head their wishlist directly behind getting out of the game in good health (knock on wood). But If we do keep Suisham for kickoffs and are forced to activate him, I'll deactivate Singleton.

Also the one place I'm not willing to negotiate numbers at on my 45 is the defensive backfield. I'm bringing 5 corners. There's no quicker way to get beat (other than both QBs going down) than to get 2 corners dinged up in a game while the opposing team goes 3 WRs all game on ya. Plus my 4th and 5th CBs are great special teamers and can both play S in a pinch.


There aren't any perfect solutions. There are people that I can't bring that I want to, and there are people I have to bring that I'd rather not. It's easy to see why Parcells is so adamant about the 45 really being his focus when putting a roster together.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
great job, but looking at your roster set-up, I'm wondering who the #2 KO returner is?
 

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Screw The Hall said:
TE - Witten, Fasano, Hannam

WR - TO, Glenn, Crayton, Rector

Nice work on the whole thing.

Am I hallucinating, or were there games last year that Bill brought only three wideouts to? I have some recollection about Price being deactivated? Forget it, it was probably 4 because Copper was included.

But this year, with more emphasis on more two te sets, I wonder if he will sometimes dress only three receivers.

Copper...I don't know. He may still make it to the last 53.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
LaTunaNostra said:
Nice work on the whole thing.

Am I hallucinating, or were there games last year that Bill brought only three wideouts to? I have some recollection about Price being deactivated? Forget it, it was probably 4 because Copper was included.

But this year, with more emphasis on more two te sets, I wonder if he will sometimes dress only three receivers.

Copper...I don't know. He may still make it to the last 53.

I think BP will dress 4 WRs if one of them is able to return punts, and I doubt it would be Crayton

I think Copper may make the final 53, but if not, he's going to make it a tough decision for Parcells
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
summerisfunner said:
great job, but looking at your roster set-up, I'm wondering who the #2 KO returner is?


That's a good question summer and to tell ya the truth even before you said that I was thinking of switching out a LB (probably Singleton) with Elam. I would like to take 9 DB's to the game, Elam gives me more options on special teams and he can sit back there on kick returns with Thompson. Good look'n out.
 

bobtheflob

New Member
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
Screw The Hall said:
That's a good question summer and to tell ya the truth even before you said that I was thinking of switching out a LB (probably Singleton) with Elam. I would like to take 9 DB's to the game, Elam gives me more options on special teams and he can sit back there on kick returns with Thompson. Good look'n out.

My one suggestion was going to be including Elam but you beat me to it. Good job on the 45.
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
LaTunaNostra said:
Nice work on the whole thing.

Am I hallucinating, or were there games last year that Bill brought only three wideouts to? I have some recollection about Price being deactivated? Forget it, it was probably 4 because Copper was included.

But this year, with more emphasis on more two te sets, I wonder if he will sometimes dress only three receivers.

Copper...I don't know. He may still make it to the last 53.

TY.

I think ya gotta bring four HH. I don't want Crayton returning punts again if I can help it (although he is a safe fall back option), and if an injury occurs I still want to be able to use some trip formations.

As far as Copper is concerned, yes mam I could easily see that happening, though I am rooting for Hurd.
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
bobtheflob said:
My one suggestion was going to be including Elam but you beat me to it. Good job on the 45.


Thx. Yeah when Summer brought up his point, it reminded me.
 

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Screw The Hall said:
TY.

I think ya gotta bring four HH. I don't want Crayton returning punts again if I can help it (although he is a safe fall back option), and if an injury occurs I still want to be able to use some trip formations.

As far as Copper is concerned, yes mam I could easily see that happening, though I am rooting for Hurd.

yeah, you're right - tho the one I don't want to see returning punts is Tnew..but no need to open that can of worms again.

I hear ya on Hurd..I am rooting for him too.
 

EMMITTnROY

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,079
Reaction score
6,648
Screw The Hall said:
TY sir.

Have you worked anything out on those strippers yet? :)
yes, my friend.. yes I have.. and she is gonna come dressed (temporarily) for the theme of my party.. feast your eyes on this tasty lick:

freak.jpg
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
EMMITTnROY said:
yes, my friend.. yes I have.. and she is gonna come dressed (temporarily) for the theme of my party.. feast your eyes on this tasty lick:

freak.jpg


Oh ... I am so there.
 

DLCassidy

Active Member
Messages
2,390
Reaction score
3
Nice job STH- you may have nailed it. Looking at it it makes you wonder why the CBA wasn't amended to allow all 53 guys to dress.
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
DLCassidy said:
Nice job STH- you may have nailed it. Looking at it it makes you wonder why the CBA wasn't amended to allow all 53 guys to dress.


It really makes no sense not to you're right. It's the one thing the league can do to offset the overall lack of depth in the league since the advent of the salary cap. And ty.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
bobtheflob said:
My one suggestion was going to be including Elam but you beat me to it. Good job on the 45.

I thought Nate Jones lined up on KO returns a few times last season or at least last pre-season. I may be imagining that.
 
Top