7-3 to 9-7

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
Absolutely pathetic. The only thing I can compare it to is the 1986 Cowboys late season swoon. Just an indictment of the entire organization.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,178
Reaction score
5,557
really is pathetic........................................we need a major overhaul.

starting with a head coach
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
I'm sick, and **** had better change around here. We're 3 wins better than last year after all that.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
We started 7-3 against teams who were a combined 73-87, and finished 2-4 against teams who were a combined 61-35.

If we could have played the schedule backward, started 2-4, and finished 7-3, would that have been a great finish?
 

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
Yes, essentially we would have done what the 91 Cowboys did- put together a five game winning streak against good teams, but this team is no 91 Cowboys.
 

Bach

Benched
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
0
kingwhicker said:
Yes, essentially we would have done what the 91 Cowboys did- put together a five game winning streak against good teams, but this team is no 91 Cowboys.

Yep. That would be the Commanders.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
kingwhicker said:
Yes, essentially we would have done what the 91 Cowboys did- put together a five game winning streak against good teams, but this team is no 91 Cowboys.
We started 7-3 against below average teams (73-87), and finished 2-4 against mostly playoff teams (61-35).

There was no turning point, and no collapse. We're a 9-7 team.

This isn't the '91 team, but it isn't the '97 team (that lost its last five) either.
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
kingwhicker said:
Absolutely pathetic. The only thing I can compare it to is the 1986 Cowboys late season swoon. Just an indictment of the entire organization.

Bingo! Remember that season crystal-clear, which made my stomach even sicker.

Yah-the game has passed Parcells by, much like it did Landry then.
 

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
Bach said:
Yep. That would be the Commanders.


Well, not quite- really not even comparable.

2005 Commanders beat the 6-10 Rams, 5-11 Cards, the 9-7 Cowboys, 11-5 Giants, and 6-10 Eagles.

1991 Cowboys beat the 14-2 Commanders (11-0 at the time), the 7-9 Steelers, the 10-6 Eagles, the 12-4 Saints, and the 10-6 Falcons.
 

DoomsDayD

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,372
Reaction score
612
I never thought i would see a Cowboy team quit as i did tonight. What a disgrace.
 

kdog

Member
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
we were 7-3 and we lost To theskins who we dominated, lost to the hawks who we dominated. We win any of those two game and this arguement would be a moot point!
BP and his scary@** playcalling caused us the season, " you are what your record says you are" Bp you are what your record says you are!
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,894
Reaction score
112,878
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
percyhoward said:
We started 7-3 against below average teams (73-87), and finished 2-4 against mostly playoff teams (61-35).

There was no turning point, and no collapse. We're a 9-7 team.
I'll be glad when those calling for BP's head realize that we are headed in the right direction. You sir, are a pleasant voice of reason.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
big dog cowboy said:
I'll be glad when those calling for BP's head realize that we are headed in the right direction. You sir, are a pleasant voice of reason.
ESPN is already saying we had a late season collapse. Never mind that our 2-4 against those teams was exactly the same winning percentage the league had against those teams during the last six games. (12-24).
 

Nerm

New Member
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
I liked the season. 9-7 is where I thought we would be. Find a kicker who can hit 35 yard FGs, we are one of the best in the NFC.

Time to go get a kicker... and a RT.
 
Top