A dynasty finally loses a superbowl!!

[Royal Laegotti]

Are the Pats still considered a dynasty to ya'll? I guess to me they are but then I always looked at NFL dynasty as being perfect in closing the deal, meaning never losing a superbowl in their dynasty decade. NE can't say they were perfect at doing that. When GB, Pitt, S.F. and Dallas did.

It's still a bit disappointing to me that the Cowboys only got to and and won 3 superbowls in the 90s, when Pitt and S.F. got 4 in their respective decades. But at least Dallas was still perfect and I take great pride in that, something New England can't say here in the 2000s.

This game has made me a little more grateful that the Cowboys were perfect in superbowls in the 90s even though it was 3-0 and not 4-0.

 

[Billy Bullocks]

Are the Pats still considered a dynasty to ya'll? I guess to me they are but then I always looked at NFL dynasty as being perfect in closing the deal, meaning never losing a superbowl in their dynasty decade. NE can't say they were perfect at doing that. When GB, Pitt, S.F. and Dallas did.

It's still a bit disappointing to me that the Cowboys only got to and and won 3 superbowls in the 90s, when Pitt and S.F. got 4 in their respective decades. But at least Dallas was still perfect and I take great pride in that, something New England can't say here in the 2000s.

This game has made me a little more grateful that the Cowboys were perfect in superbowls in the 90s even though it was 3-0 and not 4-0.

Considering Free Agency happened halfway through the decade, I wouldn't get too upset about it.

New England still deserves credit for what they did. 4 Super Bowl appearances with 3 wins in an era when alot of Super Bowl teams struggle to make the playoffs the next year.