A Play That Seems Overlooked

2much2soon

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
89
was when Witten was lined up wide left early in the game.

He completely juked the cb, think it was Trufant, left him paralyzed and blew by him downfield. Unfortunately Bledsoe led him too far inside, by design or not(may have been a post and not a fly), and the pass was almost picked off.

Still, it was most impressive to see a TE the size of Witten make that kind of a move on a good cb.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Yeah I mentioned that last night (thread was moved to the opinion zone :rolleyes: ). And it wasn't so much that Bledsoe lead him too much to the middle. Bledsoe was just late with the throw. He should of anticipated when Witten would get open and the ball should of been delivered at that time. Bledsoe just threw it way too late.
 

SuperSafety_31

New Member
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
Bledsoe was just late with the throw. He should of anticipated when Witten would get open and the ball should of been delivered at that time. Bledsoe just threw it way too late.

very true...that should have been a completion...
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
2much2soon said:
was when Witten was lined up wide left early in the game.

He completely juked the cb, think it was Trufant, left him paralyzed and blew by him downfield. Unfortunately Bledsoe led him too far inside, by design or not(may have been a post and not a fly), and the pass was almost picked off.

Still, it was most impressive to see a TE the size of Witten make that kind of a move on a good cb.

he did a similar pattern from the same position last yr vs GB and scored a long TD on it...cant remember which GB CB it was he torched

David
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
dbair1967 said:
he did a similar pattern from the same position last yr vs GB and scored a long TD on it...cant remember which GB CB it was he torched

David



It was #31 (the former Eagle). Can't remember his name right now.
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
Rack said:
Yeah I mentioned that last night (thread was moved to the opinion zone :rolleyes: ). And it wasn't so much that Bledsoe lead him too much to the middle. Bledsoe was just late with the throw. He should of anticipated when Witten would get open and the ball should of been delivered at that time. Bledsoe just threw it way too late.

That is exactly what I fear seeing repeatedly in the regular season...missed opportunities, just because Bledsoe is late in his recognition and delivery of the ball.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
That may be the case, but I don't think that's what happened on that play. I just think Bledsoe is still getting use to Witten. You can only develop so much chemistry in practice. A lot of it has to come from games. It seemed to me that Bledsoe just wasn't sure what Witten was gonna do (or when he was gonna do it). It also seemed he was a bit surprised that Witten schooled Trufant so badly.

I think it's just a timing thing. They'll develop better chemistry as they play more snaps together.
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
Rack said:
That may be the case, but I don't think that's what happened on that play. I just think Bledsoe is still getting use to Witten. You can only develop so much chemistry in practice. A lot of it has to come from games. It seemed to me that Bledsoe just wasn't sure what Witten was gonna do (or when he was gonna do it). It also seemed he was a bit surprised that Witten schooled Trufant so badly.

I think it's just a timing thing. They'll develop better chemistry as they play more snaps together.

Good point. I shouldn't be too critical of him until he has time to settle into the offense and the players around him.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
CaptainAmerica said:
That is exactly what I fear seeing repeatedly in the regular season...missed opportunities, just because Bledsoe is late in his recognition and delivery of the ball.

or maybe Witten wasnt the primary target on the play at all...

it should have been a TD, but no QB hits on everything...

he made two bad throws IMO, otherwise did well...the guy can still gun it and can still throw some accurate balls...I was extremely skeptical about the signing but if we give him good protection and the key skill guys stay healthy, he'll have a good year IMO

he's a VAST improvement over the QB's of the past 4-5 yrs we've had...

David
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
I think that we'll see Witten in as WR for a few plays a game this season. If we keep 4 TEs, that likely means only 4 WRs. Even if we keep 5 WR only 4 will be active on gameday. Witten at WR sure sounds better than bringing in anyone not named Key, Glenn, or Crayton.
 
Top