A topper on the Murray/Peterson talks

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,019
Reaction score
22,609
http://dal.scout.com/story/1524370-cowboys-and-demarco-fact-vs-fiction?s=112





...CLAIM: DeMarco is young. He’s three years from 30! FICTION: Conventional wisdom says NFL running backs fade at 30. But the Cowboys are in possession of a study that shows that “star’’ runners with big production actually fade right after 27. In short: When "standout'' runners turn 28, their yards-per-game production goes down 18 percent ... at 29, down 30 percent ... at 30, down 45 percent ... at 31, down 46 percent ... at 32, down 55 percent.

Stephen Jones is frank about what this sort of trend means.

"Running backs have kind of evolved in this league,” Jones said. “It’s tough for running backs to have a lot of longevity ...''

As you scan around the NFL at available (or maybe available) runners, who do you think might be the exception to this rule? DeMarco Murray? Or, say, Adrian Peterson?

Oh, and regarding AD: Peterson's current 2015 cap hit stands at $15.4 million. $12.75 million is base, $.25 million is workout bonus and $2.4 million is prorated bonus. The base and workout bonus would disappear if released, leaving just the $2.4 million in dead money. That would give the Vikings the net result of $13 million in savings if Peterson insists upon not re-doing a deal and expresses continued dislike of his surrounding and they released him.

That $2.4 mil in dead money is also the only amount Minny eats if they trade him. Ah, but who would trade for AD with his three years of salary locked in at $13 mil, $15 mil and $17 mil for three years?

Nobody would. But you can, in theory, trade for Peterson under the terms of a new, cheaper contract. He seemingly is facing Minnesota asking him to take a cut to stay. He can turn that down. And he might be willing to trash the $45 mil and start over in Dallas. And the $2.4 mil in dead money means the Vikings' cap doesn't have to suffer for having sent him away.

So Peterson, when he is truly ready to play his cards, has a very good hand. And the Cowboys can expect to be candidates to be dealt in.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,956
Tuesday night can't get here soon enough, so we can hear some real news.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,019
Reaction score
22,609
Pretty much the same info you posted back in January.

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/dscout-cowboys-demarco-a-future-outside-of-dallas.313564/

We get it, Stephen Jones' 'study' on RB production has been discussed at length here.

Not really the point here...that was a good explanation of the Murray side. But on the Petterson side, and he still is a stronger running back, how it could actually be feasible with a Petterson targeted and without an added draft pick towards the top of a draft. I.E.-making it a doable pickup for the Cowboys. Not that it will, but as described above, actually doable.
 

fishspill

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,783
Reaction score
3,583
There's no doubt I want AD here, but beyond that I want to ensure the running game isn't sold short when we have the services of one good back in place. The entire balance of this team in the short term is predicated on the notion we can grind the ball nearly at will. Absent that we become the 8-8 collection of various talent we were before. I have my doubts about Murray. I have my doubts about AD. Whatever those doubts are I find them redoubled in Randle and his off-field issues. With that I face the fact Dunbar seems overvalued and Williams a pipe dream. We need to get a top back here. When he's here we need to draft another top back to solidify the position. Doing so makes our passing game and defense better than any of us expected and will go a long way to making us more than a one-year wonder.

My platform is sign AD, draft Gordon/Gurley.
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
There's no doubt I want AD here, but beyond that I want to ensure the running game isn't sold short when we have the services of one good back in place. The entire balance of this team in the short term is predicated on the notion we can grind the ball nearly at will. Absent that we become the 8-8 collection of various talent we were before. I have my doubts about Murray. I have my doubts about AD. Whatever those doubts are I find them redoubled in Randle and his off-field issues. With that I face the fact Dunbar seems overvalued and Williams a pipe dream. We need to get a top back here. When he's here we need to draft another top back to solidify the position. Doing so makes our passing game and defense better than any of us expected and will go a long way to making us more than a one-year wonder.

My platform is sign AD, draft Gordon/Gurley.

I just said about the same thing. Acceptation for me is keep Murray and do the rest of what you said.
 
Top