Academic view of sports fans

lurkercowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,066
Reaction score
1,352
I'm interested in what the board thinks of this article.


http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i28/28b00801.htm

The Roar of the Crowd

Sports fans' primal behavior

By DAVID P. BARASH

Marx was wrong: The opiate of the masses isn't religion, but spectator sports. What else explains the astounding fact that millions of seemingly intelligent human beings feel that the athletic exertions of total strangers are somehow consequential for themselves? .....(continues)
 

Iago33

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
1,376
lurkercowboy;2699628 said:
I'm interested in what the board thinks of this article.


http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i28/28b00801.htm

The Roar of the Crowd

Sports fans' primal behavior

By DAVID P. BARASH

Marx was wrong: The opiate of the masses isn't religion, but spectator sports. What else explains the astounding fact that millions of seemingly intelligent human beings feel that the athletic exertions of total strangers are somehow consequential for themselves? .....(continues)

While the author seems a bit antagonistic toward sports, I think he's more or less right. When you look at it from an outsider's position, the sports craze is hard to explain. I think it fulfills a basic human desire--team and competition are built into us in one way or another.

Of course, if one looks at things from an intentionally alienating perspective, anything can seem strange. For example, why would this author (Barash) take so much time looking at and creating little black lines on a piece of paper? Isn't spending one's life learning all about cyphers on a page fanaticism of a sort, as well?
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Iago33;2699694 said:
Of course, if one looks at things from an intentionally alienating perspective, anything can seem strange. For example, why would this author (Barash) take so much time looking at and creating little black lines on a piece of paper? Isn't spending one's life learning all about cyphers on a page fanaticism of a sort, as well?

Quoted for appreciation of a unique perspective.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
This is basically what I used to major in...and they all say the same thing. It's annoying how every "authority" on sports and fandom smash it.
 

WarC

Active Member
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
0
Sports has to do with war and nature.

That is, we seek or are atleast programmed to contend with the competition for life and resources.

It's why we partition ourselves in our societies, operate in social hierarchies, compete with rival groups and establish all sorts of pecking orders.

Sports are an avenue for this basic biological 'need' in us.

There is a sense of satisfaction that is met in the fan, when his team succeeds on any given field of play. It's something that appeals to pretty primitive and instinctual aspects of our nature.

The fallacy is in proscribing this behavior only to those fans of a sport or all sports. Because its an inescapable desire/need in ALL of us, regardless of whether or not they themselves watch or follow a sport - They simply seek that satisfaction in other areas (like, perhaps, by writing articles!)
 

WarC

Active Member
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
0
Iago33;2699694 said:
While the author seems a bit antagonistic toward sports, I think he's more or less right. When you look at it from an outsider's position, the sports craze is hard to explain. I think it fulfills a basic human desire--team and competition are built into us in one way or another.

Thats absolutely it!

Why does the world follow the World Cup in Soccer?

The World Cup has become a replacement for War in Nationalism. They're an outlet for that desire to be patriotic and supportive of a movement to which the citizens of those countries belong.

It is the same for any of us who follow the NFL, except instead of blatant national or geographic allegiances we are following the uniform, the star, the players and history of the Dallas Cowboys.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
See, this is what I like about this forum over other forum's I'm a member of: there are actually people who are willing to read beyond a few paragraphs and are capable of making an intelligent response. Kudos to all who have commented thus far. And further thanks goes to the OP for introducing this topic! :toast:

Though he comes across as somewhat narcassistic, the author does make some valid points. I have often questioned my love for the sport. And football is my one true love. For as long as I can remember, regardless of what season it was, if the neighborhood kids wanted to get together to play a game, my vote was always football without question.

About the only argument I could come up with in retort to this article is rather or not the writer is a fan of chess. Because if he is, and he truly took the time to understand the sport of football, he would see how very closely related these two games are as opposed to other sports; the only differences being, of course, that the chess pieces in football have an added dimension of human fallibility: in chess the piece moves as the chess player wishes; in football, the coach tells a player to do something, but the execution is up to the player.

That added aspect to me is the beauty of this game. Watching a beautiful run, catch, hit, field goal, throw, etc. is like poetry in action. If you want to criticize the average sports fan, you are also attacking with that same demeaning animal-comparison approach those who spend their days buried in books escaping their own life to live in the shoes of their favorite character. Actually, I'm guilty of that too!

I suppose what I am saying is, we all in someway escape life through one medium or another, even the author of this article. But I suppose thanks should be offered for explaining to us why we as humans experience this incessant need. Evenso, I like the view just fine from atop of this egg!!!
 
Top