Agree or disagree: The OL didn't look all that bad until Flozell was hurt

TruBlueCowboy said:
With all this talk about a new center, and some young bucks to replace Rivera and Allen, would it be correct to say that the Cowboys offensive line really wasn't all that bad until Flozell went out? Was it KC-style dominating? No. But it gave Bledsoe a lot of time and he was picking some defenses apart for the first few weeks. Julius was even getting close to 100 yards a few times before his injury, and if memory serves, he did pass 100 yards in one of those early games if not for some penalties. Do you think Flozell's injury basically caused a cataclysm with Larry, Rob on the other side, which led to Marco, etc...., or do you think teams were bound to find out our weaknesses on the line before the season was over, Flozell or no Flozell? And maybe with guys like Rivera, Petitti or Allen, fatigue set in early.

I'm not saying we shouldn't look for some back-ups for our older guards or Al Johnson. Nor that we shouldn't find someone who can handle his men better than Rob Petitti. But if those fellas stay healthy next year, especially Flozell the Hotel, will the Boys still be able to get by?

5 years ago we hated flo and he was our "weakest link".

did he get that good or did the rest get that bad?

make 'em all 2nd string and spend our FA $ on a new line of good mix and rep. we don't win here, we don't win anywhere.
 
DragonCowboy said:
Before Flo

Pass Protection: Pop in a tape of the first Philly game
Run Protection: Pop in a tape of any game except the Carolina game

Pass Protection was great, but Run Protection atrocious...

Crap just absolute Crap

in the first 4 games alone we gave up something like 10 sacks...had numerous QB pressures...many Ints and Forced Fumbles...

this idea that Flo has suddenly become this great and all powerful LT is laughable...


 
Flozell was definitely missed however one player going down should not cause your entire Offensive Line to decline. What this proves is there are other problems such as skill and depth. Dallas must improve the Offensive Line but quit making bad decisions like signing Rivera instead of Walle. When you are going to fork over the monies to sign someone not only look at talent but look at their age.
 
garyv said:
Flozell was definitely missed however one player going down should not cause your entire Offensive Line to decline. What this proves is there are other problems such as skill and depth. Dallas must improve the Offensive Line but quit making bad decisions like signing Rivera instead of Walle. When you are going to fork over the monies to sign someone not only look at talent but look at their age.

Your right it shouldn't but the fact was we were going into the season trying to protect a rookie on the other side once Flo went down now we were having to protect 2 tackles. Petitti I have no problem cutting him some slack playing offensive tackle as a rookie is no easy task when going up aginst some of the best pass rushers in the NFL. Tucker on the other hand as a 3rd year player I expected a lot more from him. If we cut Tucker tomorrow I would have no problem with that at all. I don't think Flo is mr all pro but he was doing a decent job before going down.
 
Zaxor said:
Crap just absolute Crap

in the first 4 games alone we gave up something like 10 sacks...had numerous QB pressures...many Ints and Forced Fumbles...

this idea that Flo has suddenly become this great and all powerful LT is laughable...




We had given up 7 sacks

3 INTs

and a couple fumbled snaps

Now how was this protection the last 4 games?

Nobody said Flo was great and all powerful but he is a very good LT who was missed vwery much when he went down
 
The offensive line has been a weakness for the past several years, and it never fails to amaze me that the media cites it as a team strength year after year in the preseaon. If the offensive line is one injury away from falling completely apart then it's high time to upgrade, whether it's one key position or several.
 
Certainly we were better with Flo in the lineup. But I also believe that half way through a season, other teams will "figure you out", so to speak. It is the responsibility of the offensive game-planners to adjust. Or you would hope you are so good at execution, it doesn't matter if the opposition "knows what you're going to do" because you'll do it anyway. Niether scenario was the case.
 
The_Jackal said:
The offensive line has been a weakness for the past several years, and it never fails to amaze me that the media sites it as a team strength year after year in the preseaon. If the offensive line is one injury away from falling completely falling apart then it's high time to upgrade, whether it's one key position or several.

I agree and I think it has it has to be addressed in both the draft and FA.
 
The O-Line was adequate when Flozell was playing. Definitely not where I wanted it to be, and they weren't very good at running blocking, but the pass protection was better.

I'm doing the stat analysis right now and the one thing I noticed is that despite averaging a rather high yards per attempt and yards per completion rates, Bledsoe seemed to get sacked rather quickly. Compared to the other NFC East teams, the yards loss per sack for Dallas was much lower.

While that may sound *good* because you're essentially losing less yards, it's actually an indicator that there's a jailbreak on the O-Line.

When Flozell was in the game, they didn't give up nearly as many sacks per passing attempt or even sacks per game.

That being said, I don't want an "adequate" O-Line, I want a "very good" or "excellent" O-Line.

Rich.........
 
Yakuza Rich said:
That being said, I don't want an "adequate" O-Line, I want a "very good" or "excellent" O-Line.

Rich.........

I'd settle for consistent and reliable, and I don't mean consistently or reliably poor.
 
Move Pettiti to guard? He's an almost last round rookie. What did you expect his first year? Give the guy a break, he made some all rookie teams.

Hopefully, Flozell is alright and Al Johnson makes progress. Johnson had surgery on his knee at midseason and didn't miss a game. I think that really hurt his play. But Parcells didn't trust Gurode enough. What they need is depth.
 
TruBlueCowboy said:
With all this talk about a new center, and some young bucks to replace Rivera and Allen, would it be correct to say that the Cowboys offensive line really wasn't all that bad until Flozell went out? Was it KC-style dominating? No. But it gave Bledsoe a lot of time and he was picking some defenses apart for the first few weeks. Julius was even getting close to 100 yards a few times before his injury, and if memory serves, he did pass 100 yards in one of those early games if not for some penalties. Do you think Flozell's injury basically caused a cataclysm with Larry, Rob on the other side, which led to Marco, etc...., or do you think teams were bound to find out our weaknesses on the line before the season was over, Flozell or no Flozell? And maybe with guys like Rivera, Petitti or Allen, fatigue set in early.

I'm not saying we shouldn't look for some back-ups for our older guards or Al Johnson. Nor that we shouldn't find someone who can handle his men better than Rob Petitti. But if those fellas stay healthy next year, especially Flozell the Hotel, will the Boys still be able to get by?
i agree, but the line could be better
 
Disagree.
It was below average.
Run blocking was bad, Pass Protection was ok.
 
TruBlueCowboy said:
Do you think Flozell's injury basically caused a cataclysm with Larry, Rob on the other side, which led to Marco, etc...., or do you think teams were bound to find out our weaknesses on the line before the season was over, Flozell or no Flozell? And maybe with guys like Rivera, Petitti or Allen, fatigue set in early.

But if those fellas stay healthy next year, especially Flozell the Hotel, will the Boys still be able to get by?


I think Flozell's and Petiti's injuries are the main reasons the line was so bad. Johnson did end up getting pushed around quite a bit, it seems like teams figured out how to handle him or something.

With a healthy Flozell and a healthy and better prepared Petiti I think the tackle position will be much stronger. I'm not convinced that you'll find a rookie past the top couple tackles in the draft who could come in next year and outperform Petiti. Likewise I don't see any centers in the draft who look like they could necessarily do a better job than Johnson.

So I think it would be better to use draft picks on depth and competition rather than banking on a significant improvement from the draft.
 
TruBlueCowboy said:
With all this talk about a new center, and some young bucks to replace Rivera and Allen, would it be correct to say that the Cowboys offensive line really wasn't all that bad until Flozell went out? Was it KC-style dominating? No. But it gave Bledsoe a lot of time and he was picking some defenses apart for the first few weeks. Julius was even getting close to 100 yards a few times before his injury, and if memory serves, he did pass 100 yards in one of those early games if not for some penalties. Do you think Flozell's injury basically caused a cataclysm with Larry, Rob on the other side, which led to Marco, etc...., or do you think teams were bound to find out our weaknesses on the line before the season was over, Flozell or no Flozell? And maybe with guys like Rivera, Petitti or Allen, fatigue set in early.

I'm not saying we shouldn't look for some back-ups for our older guards or Al Johnson. Nor that we shouldn't find someone who can handle his men better than Rob Petitti. But if those fellas stay healthy next year, especially Flozell the Hotel, will the Boys still be able to get by?

I thought the offensive line was pretty solid until Flozell went down for the count. Then disaster struck....

Bottom line this team needs to address the oline in the offseason. We can't assume that Larry Allen and Marco Rivera will still be a dominant force at their ages. Also no telling what Flozell will give this unit coming of his injury.

The jury is still out on Petitti, but i wouldn't mind seeing some competition at the RT position.

Also we need a consisent center, this rotational thing just doesn't cut it. I would kill to see Lecharles Bentley in a Dallas uniform next year. Probably ain't going to happen though.:cool:
 
silver said:
we need a solid RT and move both Petitti and Tucker over to guard where their lack of foot speed is less evident. Having Flo back will be great, I just hope he's the same guy and not some Erik-Williams-post-accident-type shadow of himself.

Pettiti pulling? HAHA.

Tucker is athletic, but just not in the way you have to be to play Tackle.

Guards have to be quicker since they do alot of pulling. I just don't see Pettiti getting out there quick enough to make the play. As a LB your job is to read the guards. They will tell you where the play is going. So if I see Pettiti at guard, pulling to the right, I can pretty much deduct it's going there...and I know one thing for sure, he won't beat any LB's out there, and that gives them a free shot at the RB.
 
Billy Bullocks said:
Pettiti pulling? HAHA.

Tucker is athletic, but just not in the way you have to be to play Tackle.

Guards have to be quicker since they do alot of pulling. I just don't see Pettiti getting out there quick enough to make the play. As a LB your job is to read the guards. They will tell you where the play is going. So if I see Pettiti at guard, pulling to the right, I can pretty much deduct it's going there...and I know one thing for sure, he won't beat any LB's out there, and that gives them a free shot at the RB.

Well thats a good assessment, but to be fair our current guards have had trouble pulling as well. Rivera has looked absolutely horrible on the screen pass this year. Allen will look dominant at times, but then he will whiff badly on pulling plays as well.
 
Agree...i didnt notice we had a bad OLINE...unitl Flozell got hurt...then it was like ok, this is disgraceful.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,236
Messages
13,860,124
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top