Agree or disagree

[dupree89]

Warren Sapp just said that 100 million dollar QBs are supposed to win games without a good running game and without a good defense.

 

[Venger]

They are. Just not very many...

 

[dstovall5]

Warren Sapp just said that 100 million dollar QBs are supposed to win games without a good running game and without a good defense.

False. There's no 100 million dollar QB winning by himself right now, those top QBs either have coaching, a defense, or a running game. Though, having a great QB has it benefits as you'll win games you're not suppose to and you're usually in every football game you play in. If you compared what Romo's working with to those other guys then it's night and day, they at least have lemons to make lemon juice.

Also, doesn't the defense and running game get paid to perform as well? Why is it acceptable to some for us to have an atrocious defense and a inconsistent running game?

 

[Jerryrage]

I find that odd that he seems to think Tony Romo plays defense. They're ranked dead last in almost all stats minus takeaways.

 

[dropdeadfred5]

Sapp is a sap

 

[ufcrules1]

I don't like Sapp but in this day in age in a passing league, that could very well be true to an extent. With that said, we DO have a running game. They just won't commit to it like they should and use proper schemes to get it going.

 

[Idgit]

They win about half of them.

 

[lwehlers]

agree.

 

[J_Allen]

Nope

 

[landroverking]

Consider from which it came.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Warren Sapp just said

That is all I needed to read. I wouldn't be a Sapp fan even if he had (which we should have) drafted him.



Oh, the correct answer is disagree.

 

[03EBZ06]

Romo will never get $100 mil from his current contract so it's a moot point.

 

[RW31]

so basically one player can win games regularly by himself. sapp is a dunce.

 

[Mansta54]

Totally disagree and Sapp is one of the biggest IDIOTS on TV.

 

[xwalker]

Warren Sapp just said that 100 million dollar QBs are supposed to win games without a good running game and without a good defense.

Take a recording of anything Sapp says, tape $10 to it and you can sell the combination for $5.

 

[Rockport]

Sapp's an idiot. You don't win championships without being able to run the ball and stop the run. You have to be able to do both. We don't draft to those strengths thus we fail on a regular basis.

 

[cowboys1981]

The outcome of a game is on the entire team.

 

[Ender]

I think that's a nice quote. But it doesn't mean much. No one wins alone. Not a championship anyway...

 

[Zordon]

when you invest 20% of your cap in a single player, he better be able to put the team on his back and carry them to victory even when the rest of the team is not playing well.

 

[NextGenBoys]

False. There's no 100 million dollar QB winning by himself right now, those top QBs either have coaching, a defense, or a running game. Though, having a great QB has it benefits as you'll win games you're not suppose to and you're usually in every football game you play in. If you compared what Romo's working with to those other guys then it's night and day, they at least have lemons to make lemon juice.

Also, doesn't the defense and running game get paid to perform as well? Why is it acceptable to some for us to have an atrocious defense and a inconsistent running game?

I'm as big a Romo fan as anyone. But please. We don't have the lemons to make lemon juice? Dez, Witten, Murray, etc. We have the firepower on offense.

Why we aren't better and more explosive is an absolute joke.