ChronicCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,543
- Reaction score
- 16,005
Is this satire?
Yes and no
Is this satire?
They didn't activate Tolbert because he's not very good.Would you have preferred the Cowboys activate Tolbert even though they didn't feel he was ready quite yet?
This has nothing to do with Gallup.
Exactly...throwing that #88 on him was like putting lipstick on a pig.They got rid of Amari and didn't replace him with anyone. Lamb is not a #1 receiver no matter how much Jerry wants him to be.
no, all you need to know is when jerry said when they are talking about the cowboys he has done his job....that's what jerry thinks is his job to have people talking about the cowboys. a GMs job is winning. not radio waves.There are mounds of evidence to deem this Front Office as incompetent, but the only piece you really need is this: you trade a true number one receiver, for a fifth round draft pick, when you just gave up a first round draft pick for him four years ago! CeeDee Lamb is good, but he is no Amari Cooper. In fact, I would say that the presence of Amari on the field made CeeDee a better receiver.
Correct....but if Cooper can have a poor stat line and still be a #1WR can't we give Lamb a little more time other than week 1 as well?
There are mounds of evidence to deem this Front Office as incompetent, but the only piece you really need is this: you trade a true number one receiver, for a fifth round draft pick, when you just gave up a first round draft pick for him four years ago! CeeDee Lamb is good, but he is no Amari Cooper. In fact, I would say that the presence of Amari on the field made CeeDee a better receiver.
Cooper went downhill & that's why Lamb outplayed him in 2021. Numbers don't lie. That's "the only piece you really need".There are mounds of evidence to deem this Front Office as incompetent, but the only piece you really need is this: you trade a true number one receiver, for a fifth round draft pick, when you just gave up a first round draft pick for him four years ago! CeeDee Lamb is good, but he is no Amari Cooper. In fact, I would say that the presence of Amari on the field made CeeDee a better receiver.
The Browns restructured Cooper's contract; and if the reports are accurate, Cooper wanted the Cowboys to do the same thing. They traded him for a 5th round draft pick.......FIFTH ROUND; and who did they draft in the 5th round? Matt Waletzko, a tackle from North Dakota.
that's simply not true, it was about getting rid of a 20 million dollar player that wasn't playing at a 20 million dollar level.
Cooper went downhill & that's why Lamb outbeat him with the numbers in 2021. That's "the only piece you really need".
Udfa were ready. They cant draft unless there target options are goneWould you have preferred the Cowboys activate Tolbert even though they didn't feel he was ready quite yet?
This has nothing to do with Gallup.
If they didn't trash him in the media prior to the trade they would have got better value.Salary dump. All trading Cooper was about. They took the highest offer they got. That simple.
RetweetRestructuring Coop's contract was the right thing to do; moving on from him was the absolute wrong thing to do. You can't just take his stats from yesterday and imply that was his overall contribution. Coop opens up the field for other receivers; which is why, in my opinion, Lamb had a productive year last year. So, if we look at Coop's stats from yesterday, then it's fair to look at Lamb's. Our WR1 had 2 receptions for 29 yards. There's no other way to look at it, our incompetent front office destroyed the #1 offense in a matter of weeks.
Not sure if serious, but you may be on to something, lolUdfa were ready. They cant draft unless there target options are gone
First it was Dez....as the scapegoatNope
It was about making Dak comfortable
NeverFirst it was Dez....as the scapegoat
Then Beasley...
Then Cooper....
Next...Lamb
@ What point does this front office realize #4 has been the problem the whole time?