Analysts Pushing it With N.O

SaintzRmarching;1229752 said:
How many NFC teams have the Boys beat with .500 or above records (and your lucky the colts have 9 wins, cause there is a chance they won't get 1 more)?

Man, what time do you start drinking down there? You have sucked on too many crawfish heads! You know from week to week this theory about beating a team without a winning record changes. Carolina beat the Ravens and THE SAINTS, but now the Panthers are under 500. You think it matters to the Giants that they beat the Panthers in Charlotte, SOMETHING THE SAINTS COULDN'T DO BUT WE DID RATHER HANDILY, and now under your theory they wouldn't be given credit for that because the Panthers don't have a winning record? It all depends on when you play a team. Were Atlanta and the Eagles over 500 when you beat them? They are now, and all of a sudden you have beaten teams with winning records.
 
rkhaze;1228143 said:
And on a side note, ive watched alot of their games this year jsut to watch bush, and they get alot of favorable calls. I really think its the NFLs way of paying them back for last year just like i think Houston not taking BUSH so N.O could have him had the NFL behind it.

Good call. Houston would totally gut their franchise and possibly cripple it just to help NO out. Happens all the time in the NFL.

Dallas Cowboys, classiest fans on earth
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,007
Messages
13,783,537
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top