Android to overtake iPhone in 2012

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
LINK

Android to overtake iPhone in 2012 - analyst

Symbian still on top, but BlackBerry down

Google’s Android will have more than quadrupled its market share by the end of 2012, market watcher Gartner has claimed. But Symbian looks set to remain the dominant smartphone OS for several years to come.

Android’s market share stood at a paltry 1.6 per cent during Q1 2009, but will grow to 14.5 per cent by the time Q4 2012 rolls around, Gartner forecast, based on an estimated 522m smartphones shipping worldwide during the period.

As a result, Android will move from its current position as the sixth most popular operating system for smartphones to become the second most popular, Gartner said.

The main reason for Android’s market share growth will, Gartner VP Ken Dulaney told website AppleInsider, be because “unlike Apple, they [Google] license their OS to multiple OEMs”.

Dulaney said many handset makers are betting their futures on Android, while Apple is just one company.

Speaking of Apple, its share of the smartphone OS market will also grow - but only from 10.8 per cent to 13.7 per cent, Gartner said.

Symbian will remain the most popular OS. However, its market share will drop from 49.3 per cent during Q1 2009 to 39 per cent by Q4 2012.

Research in Motion’s BlackBerry OS is currently the second most popular handset OS, Gartner said, with a Q1 2009 market share of 19.9 per cent. But it will slip to fifth place by Q4 2012 with market share of just 12.5 per cent.

Windows Mobile's share will grow from 10.3 per cent to 12.8 per cent during the same quarters, Gartner added, which will see it remain as the fourth most popular phone-based OS.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Absolutely.


IMO Apple made a big mistake. They could have had a LIONS share of the cellular market by now if they had given it to all carriers. They didnt and now they will get crushed.


Android will be free phone software that you can customize to your hearts desire. FREE.

Most apps will be FREE.

There will be an advanced ENTERPRISE edition but it will be cheap and you will have EVERYTHING you need.



Android to become available for Verizon soon. A month or two. I cant wait.

I purposely sent back the Dare and the Blackberry for being inadequate. Google Android will not be.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
YoMick;3009424 said:
Absolutely.


IMO Apple made a big mistake. They could have had a LIONS share of the cellular market by now if they had given it to all carriers. They didnt and now they will get crushed.


Android will be free phone software that you can customize to your hearts desire. FREE.

Most apps will be FREE.

There will be an advanced ENTERPRISE edition but it will be cheap and you will have EVERYTHING you need.



Android to become available for Verizon soon. A month or two. I cant wait.

I purposely sent back the Dare and the Blackberry for being inadequate. Google Android will not be.
This has more to do with the fact that you can slap Android into any crappy phone, whereas the iPhone is about hardware as much as it's about software.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
YoMick;3009424 said:
Absolutely.


IMO Apple made a big mistake. They could have had a LIONS share of the cellular market by now if they had given it to all carriers. They didnt and now they will get crushed.


Android will be free phone software that you can customize to your hearts desire. FREE.

Most apps will be FREE.

There will be an advanced ENTERPRISE edition but it will be cheap and you will have EVERYTHING you need.



Android to become available for Verizon soon. A month or two. I cant wait.

I purposely sent back the Dare and the Blackberry for being inadequate. Google Android will not be.
I've seen the first Google phone and I found it lacking. The phone I'm actually looking forward to is the new Nokia N900. It is supposed to rival the iPhone, but be different. It supports the touch screen, but also includes a full keyboard.

Very cool stuff.

[youtube]<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JUCc2C4JPJE&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JUCc2C4JPJE&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>[/youtube]

theogt;3009450 said:
This has more to do with the fact that you can slap Android into any crappy phone, whereas the iPhone is about hardware as much as it's about software.

It's about money. Apple doesn't put it on any other hardware because they want to sell you the hardware. (the more they sell you, the more money they make) Why do you think they expect you to send them your iPhone to change the battery? The iPhone's hardware isn't any higher quality than a Blackberry, Android, or any other *real* smart phone.
 

kapolani

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
374
We'll see.

Apple isn't going to stand idly by while the others creep up.

Plus they have to overcome the iPhone's huge popularity and app support.

It also looks like iPhone exclusivity is going by the wayside.

Regardless, competition is good.

- iPhone 3GS Jailbroken and loving it
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
nyc;3010347 said:
It's about money. Apple doesn't put it on any other hardware because they want to sell you the hardware. (the more they sell you, the more money they make) Why do you think they expect you to send them your iPhone to change the battery? The iPhone's hardware isn't any higher quality than a Blackberry, Android, or any other *real* smart phone.
You treat corporations like football teams.

It's kinda odd.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
nyc;3010723 said:
NFL teams ARE corporations.
The Packers are a corporation, but I believe most others are not.

Regardless, in logic terms, just because all X are Y doesn't mean all Y are X.
 

MapleLeaf

Maple Leaf
Messages
5,207
Reaction score
1,598
...by Nokia was horrible!

If you are trying to use this as an advance tool to market to customers in English speaking nations you should find an employee who is clear and understandable in their English and have them host the video.

What the Finns did here was terrible. If it's a video in Swahili find someone who communicates in that language. If it Dutch same thing, but don't plug in one of your corporate nationals as a way to stroke his ego.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;3010746 said:
The Packers are a corporation, but I believe most others are not.

Regardless, in logic terms, just because all X are Y doesn't mean all Y are X.

No, the Packers are the only team that has shareholders. (public corporation) All NFL teams are corporations, most are just private. They are businesses just like any other businesses. They have employees and a product that they sell.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
nyc;3010833 said:
No, the Packers are the only team that has shareholders. (public corporation) All NFL teams are corporations, most are just private. They are businesses just like any other businesses. They have employees and a product that they sell.
A corporation is just one type of business entity. There are corporations, partnerships, limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships, limited liability companies, etc.

If I'm not mistaken, the Cowboys are organized as a limited liability company, not a corporation.

The Packers are the only football team that I know of that is actually a corporation. There are likely others, but certainly not every NFL teams is organized as a corporation.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;3011115 said:
A corporation is just one type of business entity. There are corporations, partnerships, limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships, limited liability companies, etc.

If I'm not mistaken, the Cowboys are organized as a limited liability company, not a corporation.

The Packers are the only football team that I know of that is actually a corporation. There are likely others, but certainly not every NFL teams is organized as a corporation.

Hmm.. They are rather large to be an LLC. It wouldn't make since tax wise in my opinion. I don't know their actual standing, but the point of corporation or LLC isn't really relevant to our discussion. The point is they are a business which you made a comment saying they were ran like I corporation. (corporation is a business)

Either way, it doesn't matter. We are just ... well

BeatDeadHorse.gif
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
nyc;3011229 said:
Hmm.. They are rather large to be an LLC. It wouldn't make since tax wise in my opinion. I don't know their actual standing, but the point of corporation or LLC isn't really relevant to our discussion. The point is they are a business which you made a comment saying they were ran like I corporation. (corporation is a business)

Either way, it doesn't matter. We are just ... well
There is no size limit for LLCs. And it makes perfect sense for tax reasons, since they receive "pass-trough" taxation, rather than corporate tax treatment. The difference in tax treatment there (in very simple terms) has nothing to do with the size of business but whether or not their securities are publicly traded on a national exchange. You can have large businesses that are not publicly traded and small businesses that are publicly traded.

And I think you very well know that there's a significant difference between rooting for a business that operates as a football team as opposed to one that operates as a manufacturer of technology.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;3011359 said:
There is no size limit for LLCs. And it makes perfect sense for tax reasons, since they receive "pass-trough" taxation, rather than corporate tax treatment. The difference in tax treatment there (in very simple terms) has nothing to do with the size of business but whether or not their securities are publicly traded on a national exchange. You can have large businesses that are not publicly traded and small businesses that are publicly traded.

And I think you very well know that there's a significant difference between rooting for a business that operates as a football team as opposed to one that operates as a manufacturer of technology.

On the highest level it is the same. Of course there are differences in how things happen at lower levels obviously, but in the end, business is business. Everything that makes up a business still exist. Product, marketing, distribution, accounting, employees, R&D, etc. For some companies, their product and distribution is a blender sent my truck or train box car. For my company, a trading platform sent by TCP/IP. They develop blenders so people can cook at home, we develop technology so that institutions can trade large amounts of energy derivatives. The Cowboys product is a football team and their distribution is television broadcast.

All businesses have the same basic building blocks.

There is a reason why you get CEO's of huge mega-corporations that go not only from one company to another, but into entirely different sectors. These guys are super smart business wise. They can make the primary decisions, just just require a good staff below them that know their job and can present the information needed for the CEO to make the the right decision.

Jerry makes great business decisions concerning the Cowboys on the business side, but he lets his emotions get in the way when trying to handle the team itself. He is a micro-manager, he must have his hands on everything.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
nyc;3011473 said:
On the highest level it is the same. Of course there are differences in how things happen at lower levels obviously, but in the end, business is business. Everything that makes up a business still exist. Product, marketing, distribution, accounting, employees, R&D, etc. For some companies, their product and distribution is a blender sent my truck or train box car. For my company, a trading platform sent by TCP/IP. They develop blenders so people can cook at home, we develop technology so that institutions can trade large amounts of energy derivatives. The Cowboys product is a football team and their distribution is television broadcast.

All businesses have the same basic building blocks.

There is a reason why you get CEO's of huge mega-corporations that go not only from one company to another, but into entirely different sectors. These guys are super smart business wise. They can make the primary decisions, just just require a good staff below them that know their job and can present the information needed for the CEO to make the the right decision.

Jerry makes great business decisions concerning the Cowboys on the business side, but he lets his emotions get in the way when trying to handle the team itself. He is a micro-manager, he must have his hands on everything.
Holy smokes, you're full of it.

Football. Computers.

People root for one. Not the other.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
Thank you for the discussion, gentlemen. I'm not as informed as I ought to be on the differences between various types of businesses, and your exchange has been enlightening.:)
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
ScipioCowboy;3012792 said:
Thank you for the discussion, gentlemen. I'm not as informed as I ought to be on the differences between various types of businesses, and your exchange has been enlightening.:)
Oh, good, then we can get into a discussion about the previously proposed amendments to Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides exemption for certain publicly traded partnerships from tax treatment as corporations. Of course, it's a dead issue now that the witch hunt on private equity firms has subsided due to most of them taking bath during the recession.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
theogt;3012832 said:
Oh, good, then we can get into a discussion about the previously proposed amendments to Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides exemption for certain publicly traded partnerships from tax treatment as corporations. Of course, it's a dead issue now that the witch hunt on private equity firms has subsided due to most of them taking bath during the recession.

Wait a sec...

I'm bringing up wiki.;)
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
YoMick;3009424 said:
Absolutely.


IMO Apple made a big mistake. They could have had a LIONS share of the cellular market by now if they had given it to all carriers. They didnt and now they will get crushed.


Android will be free phone software that you can customize to your hearts desire. FREE.

Most apps will be FREE.

There will be an advanced ENTERPRISE edition but it will be cheap and you will have EVERYTHING you need.



Android to become available for Verizon soon. A month or two. I cant wait.

I purposely sent back the Dare and the Blackberry for being inadequate. Google Android will not be.

Giving their software to anyone in the search for market share has never been Apple's way of doing things. They prefer limited outlets they can have leverage over and control rather than just trying to sell it to anyone that will buy it.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;3012731 said:
Holy smokes, you're full of it.

Football. Computers.

People root for one. Not the other.

:confused: Maybe I misunderstood your first comment about football teams and corporations. I said football teams ARE corporations (businesses) Now you're talking about rooting for teams and corporations.

btw, I do root for some companies like football teams. Especially the ones I've invested in. ;)
 
Top