Another reminder to disregard all PFF grades

Hold on, it's possible though. Dak nearly threw a few picks and Brisset could have had INTs that hit the receivers in the hands and bounced into the defeneder's. Unlike fans who feel good, PFF tries to take an analytical approach. And sometimes the result obscures the performance. I actually think Dak played better vs the Ravens as far as throwing the ball...so it's possible for a guy to have a not-so-great stat sheet but grade high on PFF.
 
I'm a Dak critic, but this is ridiculous. Dak is clearly playing better via the eye test.
 
Hold on, it's possible though. Dak nearly threw a few picks and Brisset could have had INTs that hit the receivers in the hands and bounced into the defeneder's. Unlike fans who feel good, PFF tries to take an analytical approach. And sometimes the result obscures the performance. I actually think Dak played better vs the Ravens as far as throwing the ball...so it's possible for a guy to have a not-so-great stat sheet but grade high on PFF.
and this is the great fault with thinking analytics is everything
reality is that in those two games dak played better in every way that matters in the ACTUAL GAME.
 
Hold on, it's possible though. Dak nearly threw a few picks and Brisset could have had INTs that hit the receivers in the hands and bounced into the defeneder's. Unlike fans who feel good, PFF tries to take an analytical approach. And sometimes the result obscures the performance. I actually think Dak played better vs the Ravens as far as throwing the ball...so it's possible for a guy to have a not-so-great stat sheet but grade high on PFF.
Brisett had 1 tipped pass that was picked, one where he was hit just as he was throwing into single coverage with a safety coming over, and the last play of the game where he threw it right to the defender who returned it for a score.

Yes, they try to be more “analytical” but if you can just pretend like some INTs don’t exist and others do in order to justify rankings then you’re entirely too subjective to produce any consistency.
 
and this is the great fault with thinking analytics is everything
reality is that in those two games dak played better in every way that matters in the ACTUAL GAME.
The same problem exists in the pre-draft combine. Many front offices think abstract "measurables" are an accurate predictor of NFL success, while often ignoring the guys with all the un-measurable intangibles who just win.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
476,178
Messages
14,671,182
Members
24,227
Latest member
Nathaniel
Back
Top