Answers At Safety, Offensive Line Could Come In FA, Draft

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
PHOENIX – Change could still be coming at safety and on the offensive line.

Head coach Jason Garrett said Wednesday at the NFC Coaches Breakfast that the Cowboys need to be stronger on the offensive line and run the football better, and the way to address that is in free agency and the draft.

That could also be the case at safety.

“You look at the landscape of free agency,” Garrett said. “You look at the landscape of the draft and say, ‘Hmm. Do we need to create more competition there?’ We might. But again, we like a couple of guys we have there.”

http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/a...FA-Draft/342075ba-f865-4a27-a00e-764066f9f644
 

Califan007

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
331
ethiostar;5029073 said:
:laugh1:

I was thinking ebay.
LOL!

Ok, there's also trades, but still lol...I expect this guy's next article to be "Cowboys scoring more points than their opponents could lead to more wins in 2013".
 

onetrickpony

Active Member
Messages
755
Reaction score
83
Califan007;5029075 said:
I expect this guy's next article to be "Cowboys scoring more points than their opponents could lead to more wins in 2013".

:bow:

Well, it make me laugh, anyway.:laugh1:
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
i'm betting it's a bit of both. i think we will sign a vet on the oline and safety
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
i wont mind if we sign a guy or two, but i dont think it should detract from the draft. im hopng they are targeting certain players heavily in this draft to either be long term solutions OR accept they wont go far with those drafted and will have to look at FA next year, which hopefully will be deeper.

I dont know about you guys, but im not impressed with this FA class.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,966
Reaction score
29,031
ShiningStar;5029562 said:
i wont mind if we sign a guy or two, but i dont think it should detract from the draft. im hopng they are targeting certain players heavily in this draft to either be long term solutions OR accept they wont go far with those drafted and will have to look at FA next year, which hopefully will be deeper.

I dont know about you guys, but im not impressed with this FA class.

Only guy I would have been interested in was Levitre, and at that for nowhere near the money he actually got.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
Im starting to think Dallas will draft a safety later in the draft to compete. Watch out for McDonald. Dallas always seems to bring up they like whats back there at the moment. I believe they are going OL and DL. Warmack, Cooper, Lane Fluker will be RD1 pick. If Dallas ends up trading Spencer DE will be RD2 pick to compete with Crawford. If they keep him i think the best DT will be picked.
 

dogberry

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,009
Reaction score
773
Jerry needs to spend some of his $200 million cash flow on a cloning program.

I'm 6 percent Neanderthal and willing to donate DNA.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
conner01;5029459 said:
i'm betting it's a bit of both. i think we will sign a vet on the oline and safety

Totally. Let's sign "whoever is left" again like last year since it worked out so well.

I'm still trying to figure out the math behind all the moves we've made on the oline, including paying a guy like he was Top 5 at his position, spending a first round pick on another guy, bringing in two FA's, trading for another guy, etc and yet we STILL only have one spot on the line that anyone has confidence in.

It's insane.
 

Hook'em#11

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,561
Reaction score
2,001
jobberone;5029069 said:
PHOENIX – Change could still be coming at safety and on the offensive line.

Head coach Jason Garrett said Wednesday at the NFC Coaches Breakfast that the Cowboys need to be stronger on the offensive line and run the football better, and the way to address that is in free agency and the draft.

That could also be the case at safety.

“You look at the landscape of free agency,” Garrett said. “You look at the landscape of the draft and say, ‘Hmm. Do we need to create more competition there?’ We might. But again, we like a couple of guys we have there.”

http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/a...FA-Draft/342075ba-f865-4a27-a00e-764066f9f644

Delusional.. Really..


And, there lies the problem with this current franchise.
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
burmafrd;5029453 said:
dumpster diving again for the O line


Hey, sometimes you can get lucky digging through someone else's trash!

Its a buyers market so they might be able to find a good guard/tackle and a safety for a great price! The key is not to overpay.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
LOL way to go out on a limb Dc.com..

OL could come from FA or the draft, where else would they come from?
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,217
Reaction score
24,065
Funny to me that the notion of signing a FA OL is even a relevant option to this fan base.

Not like this team has the cap room to go out and sign a better OL than is already on roster, and if they did get whats available within their budgeted cap this year, would it be any better than the current players on the OL?

Why create a log jam of the same level players with minimal cap dollars? Whatever cap spending this team has, and IF they choose to even sign a FA, it will be at another position of need,, not OL.

IF we sign a FA, I would imagine they spend what they have on a RB.
 

jjktkk

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,283
Reaction score
1,363
Typhus;5029870 said:
Funny to me that the notion of signing a FA OL is even a relevant option to this fan base.

Not like this team has the cap room to go out and sign a better OL than is already on roster, and if they did get whats available within their budgeted cap this year, would it be any better than the current players on the OL?

Why create a log jam of the same level players with minimal cap dollars? Whatever cap spending this team has, and IF they choose to even sign a FA, it will be at another position of need,, not OL.

IF we sign a FA, I would imagine they spend what they have on a RB.

Theres always a chance a good player(OL) can get cut, and be signed for a reasonable contract. The question would be could he be an upgrade over any current Cowboys Olinemen? For ex., say a Brandon Moore.
sign Moore, cut another Cowboys player. I say this counting on Dallas having money to spend, once they get Romo, and Spencer signed.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Typhus;5029870 said:
Funny to me that the notion of signing a FA OL is even a relevant option to this fan base.

Not like this team has the cap room to go out and sign a better OL than is already on roster, and if they did get whats available within their budgeted cap this year, would it be any better than the current players on the OL?

Why create a log jam of the same level players with minimal cap dollars? Whatever cap spending this team has, and IF they choose to even sign a FA, it will be at another position of need,, not OL.

IF we sign a FA, I would imagine they spend what they have on a RB.

Note: if Derrick Dockery took some snaps for your team last season, then there's room to upgrade your OL with a veteran FA. And if you're looking to possibly cut Doug Free in favor of starting Jeremy Parnell, then you also want a value FA veteran who's at least started some games in the league available in case of injury because you're going to spend a lot of practice snaps getting your young starter up to speed.

More than anything, if you can pickup a guy who's worked with Callahan and who gives you some position flexibility, you can look to backup more than one position on gameday with fewer players, letting you, for example, maybe shuffle Bernadeau to C if Costa goes down in the first quarter without hurting yourself so much at RG. Or keep a rookie at his more comfortable position if the player next to him goes down because you've got a guy on the bench with starting experience at both OG and RT.

Basically, in the NFL, you need quality OTs, position flexibility across the line, at least one swing tackle, and 5 or so interior OLs all capable of playing NFL-caliber football to make it through a whole season. Last year, we developed a hole at RT, and then lost Costa, Nagy, Kowalski, and had injuries to Bernadeau and Livings that hampered their play at least semi-significantly for long stretches of the year. All of those 5 guys are questionable starters to begin with. When you lose them outright and have to juggle them into and out of the lineup, you're not going to get anywhere.

Even moderate upgrades in the form of a flexible second-tier veteran and the right 1st-3rd round pick or picks would provide competition across the board and have a big impact in terms of the options the team would have available to it during the season when it comes time to plug someone else into the starting lineup.

I'd love to add another 'ace' to the front. We should try to do that if it's at all possible. But there's also plenty of room to get better with relatively minor upgrades to that position group. And this is a great offseason to do that if we ever manage to get any cap space to maneuver with. There are a lot of good players available, and demand is way down with the cap being so much lower than most teams had budgeted for. In that environment, Dallas is a great place to play for a one-year deal.
 
Top