jimmy40
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,866
- Reaction score
- 1,888
How could that be? If Parcells had LJ starting then he must be better.abersonc said:Well, we'd be a worse team.
How could that be? If Parcells had LJ starting then he must be better.abersonc said:Well, we'd be a worse team.
So it couldn't be than an undrafted free agent actually got better? Wasn't Emmitt Smith a system running back? Aren't all running backs a product of their system. When did this "system running back" turn into a negative thing? Who was the running back that started people thinking this way?Alexander said:In some cases, yes.
He was just another guy with the Ravens. He was not the TD machine he is in KC. And I bet Johnson is JAG elsewhere.
*insert former denver rb here*jimmy40 said:So it couldn't be than an undrafted free agent actually got better? Wasn't Emmitt Smith a system running back? Aren't all running backs a product of their system. When did this "system running back" turn into a negative thing? Who was the running back that started people thinking this way?
jimmy40 said:So it couldn't be than an undrafted free agent actually got better? Wasn't Emmitt Smith a system running back? Aren't all running backs a product of their system. When did this "system running back" turn into a negative thing? Who was the running back that started people thinking this way?
rojan said:I remmeber Micky saying a while ago that we could have traded AB for Cheifs RB Larry Johnson but Parcells didnt wont to because he wonted depth at WR. Imagine that, with Jones still injured he would have probly given us the running game to make it to the playoffs.
jman said:There was also that little thing about KC not wanting to get rid of Johnson when it was said and done with. It just took a little time for Vermiel's diaper remark about Johnson to cool off. That trade was never going to happen.