Any interest in Brandon Graham DE-Philly?

[egn22]

When was the last time the Cowboys signed a player from a division rival? I can't think of one off the top of my head.

Damn that's a good question, I can't think of anyone.
First thing that comes to mind is Canty, Hatcher, and Bennett. But I can't think of any former Giants, Eagles or Skins we've signed.

 

[AshyLarry06]

While I don't have anything against Brandon Graham in particular, I am getting a little irritated of seeing a seemingly limitless amount of these "new-age" Cowboys fans who are a little too aware of the "new and improved" way in which the F.O. operates.

Some of the more common information/insight offered by your "new-age" Cowboys fan usually starts with the popular " they won't sign him bc he will want big bucks" which is almost always followed by the old, "the F.O. now knows that SB-contending teams are only built by going after low-dollar, high-character guys like Mincey and Selvie".

To top it off, your casual, disturbingly-annoying "smart and savvy" new-age Cowboys fan will most likely conclude with a parting shot aimed at those outdated, antiquated Cowboys fans who put forth ridiculous claims such as the Cowboys signing a big-name free-agent for a lucrative-but-fair contract based on the player's assets.

Potential phrases used could stem anywhere from a relatively-new attempt like "Yeah becuz that sure worked well for the 2008 Cowboys, didn't it?!" to a potential GEM like "Sounds like something one of the largely unsuccessful and clueless Cowboys teams of the past would do."

I know, I know, got a little carried away, but good God man, every team NEEDS a couple of those BIG-TIME talents on both sides of the ball, usually at positions like WR, DE, and FS. THIS Cowboys team and more specifically, this DEFENSIVE unit, already has WAY too many "low-dollar" guys who are solid at just about everything but not dynamic in any single area. The SOLUTION to this problem, IMO, is NOT to go out and sign MORE low-dollar, average-at-all but Great-at-none type players, but rather to acquire one to two DYNAMIC talents especially on the D-Line.

And this notion of "ALL HIGH-PRICED FA's ARE BAD" is REALLY getting old. Maybe instead of judging potential future success based solely off the COST of the player,why not judge potential future success based on the player's SKILL and PRODUCTION?? Such a novel concept, no?

 

[egn22]

While I don't have anything against Brandon Graham in particular, I am getting a little irritated of seeing a seemingly limitless amount of these "newly knowledgeable" Cowboys fans who are a little too aware of the "new and improved" way in which the F.O. operates.

Some of the more common information/insight offered by your "new-age" Cowboys fan usually starts with the popular " they won't sign him bc he will want big bucks" which is almost always followed by the old "the F.O. now knows that SB-contending teams are built by only going after low-dollar, high-character guys like Mincey and Selvie".

To top it off, your casual, disturbingly-annoying "smart and savvy" new-age Cowboys fan will probably conclude with a parting shot aimed at those outdated, antiquated Cowboys fans who suggest Dallas sign a big-name free-agent for a somewhat lucrative-sized contract.

Potential phrases used could stem anywhere from a relatively-new attempt like "Yeah becuz that sure worked well for the 2008 Cowboys, didn't it?!" to one of the all-timers in "Sounds like something one of the largely unsuccessful and clueless Cowboys teams of the past would do."

I know, I know, got a little carried away, but good God man, every team NEEDS a couple of those BIG-TIME talents on both sides of the ball, usually at positions like WR, DE, and FS. THIS Cowboys team and more specifically, this DEFENSIVE unit, already has WAY too many "low-dollar" guys who are solid at just about everything but not dynamic in any single area. The SOLUTION to this problem, IMO, is NOT to go out and sign MORE low-dollar, average-at-all but Great-at-none type players, but rather to acquire one to two DYNAMIC talents especially on the D-Line.

And this notion of "ALL HIGH-PRICED FA's ARE BAD" is REALLY getting old. Maybe instead of judging potential future success based solely off the COST of the player,why not judge potential future success based on the player's SKILL and PRODUCTION?? Such a novel concept, no?

Man who pissed in your Cheerios? Lol

 

[AshyLarry06]

Man who pissed in your Cheerios? Lol

idk but i feel a lot better now that I got that off my chest.

 

[Hardline]

Damn that's a good question, I can't think of anyone.
First thing that comes to mind is Canty, Hatcher, and Bennett. But I can't think of any former Giants, Eagles or Skins we've signed.

Terrell Owens from the eagles may be the last one.

 

[CowboyChris]

While I don't have anything against Brandon Graham in particular, I am getting a little irritated of seeing a seemingly limitless amount of these "new-age" Cowboys fans who are a little too aware of the "new and improved" way in which the F.O. operates.

Some of the more common information/insight offered by your "new-age" Cowboys fan usually starts with the popular " they won't sign him bc he will want big bucks" which is almost always followed by the old, "the F.O. now knows that SB-contending teams are only built by going after low-dollar, high-character guys like Mincey and Selvie".

To top it off, your casual, disturbingly-annoying "smart and savvy" new-age Cowboys fan will most likely conclude with a parting shot aimed at those outdated, antiquated Cowboys fans who put forth ridiculous claims such as the Cowboys signing a big-name free-agent for a lucrative-but-fair contract based on the player's assets.

Potential phrases used could stem anywhere from a relatively-new attempt like "Yeah becuz that sure worked well for the 2008 Cowboys, didn't it?!" to a potential GEM like "Sounds like something one of the largely unsuccessful and clueless Cowboys teams of the past would do."

I know, I know, got a little carried away, but good God man, every team NEEDS a couple of those BIG-TIME talents on both sides of the ball, usually at positions like WR, DE, and FS. THIS Cowboys team and more specifically, this DEFENSIVE unit, already has WAY too many "low-dollar" guys who are solid at just about everything but not dynamic in any single area. The SOLUTION to this problem, IMO, is NOT to go out and sign MORE low-dollar, average-at-all but Great-at-none type players, but rather to acquire one to two DYNAMIC talents especially on the D-Line.

And this notion of "ALL HIGH-PRICED FA's ARE BAD" is REALLY getting old. Maybe instead of judging potential future success based solely off the COST of the player,why not judge potential future success based on the player's SKILL and PRODUCTION?? Such a novel concept, no?

Amen.

The one that tires me out the most is... "If we can sign him on the cheap?" what good player is going to want to sign on the cheap?

 

[Wood]

I can tell you this. Philly is not concerned over losing him.

 

[Joe Realist]

When was the last time the Cowboys signed a player from a division rival? I can't think of one off the top of my head.

TO????

 

[xwalker]

Ever watch Pawn Stars, there is a huge difference between asking for something and getting something. Especially when supply is high and demand is well... still high but still have a high supply.

Yep, I like that show.

If you like that check out American Pickers.

 

[windward]

Damn that's a good question, I can't think of anyone.
First thing that comes to mind is Canty, Hatcher, and Bennett. But I can't think of any former Giants, Eagles or Skins we've signed.

T.O?

That's the only one I can think of recently.

 

[RonSpringsdaman20]

forsome reason, I thought he was sub 6'1

somebody is a fibber....

 

[Mansta54]

Greg Hardy

^^^^THIS^^^^^

 

[Sydla]

Just read that he's seeking something in the $30 mil range for 4 years.... Nevermind

Good luck with that, Brandon.

 

[Longboysfan]

I think Philly thought they could get him on the cheap.

No. Philly will not sign unless he comes cheap.....

 

[TonyRomo17]

 

[big dog cowboy]

He's definitely an upgrade over what we have.

That made me snicker. A lot of JAG's on our DL roster.

 

[LittleD]

While I don't have anything against Brandon Graham in particular, I am getting a little irritated of seeing a seemingly limitless amount of these "new-age" Cowboys fans who are a little too aware of the "new and improved" way in which the F.O. operates.

Some of the more common information/insight offered by your "new-age" Cowboys fan usually starts with the popular " they won't sign him bc he will want big bucks" which is almost always followed by the old, "the F.O. now knows that SB-contending teams are only built by going after low-dollar, high-character guys like Mincey and Selvie".

To top it off, your casual, disturbingly-annoying "smart and savvy" new-age Cowboys fan will most likely conclude with a parting shot aimed at those outdated, antiquated Cowboys fans who put forth ridiculous claims such as the Cowboys signing a big-name free-agent for a lucrative-but-fair contract based on the player's assets.

Potential phrases used could stem anywhere from a relatively-new attempt like "Yeah becuz that sure worked well for the 2008 Cowboys, didn't it?!" to a potential GEM like "Sounds like something one of the largely unsuccessful and clueless Cowboys teams of the past would do."

I know, I know, got a little carried away, but good God man, every team NEEDS a couple of those BIG-TIME talents on both sides of the ball, usually at positions like WR, DE, and FS. THIS Cowboys team and more specifically, this DEFENSIVE unit, already has WAY too many "low-dollar" guys who are solid at just about everything but not dynamic in any single area. The SOLUTION to this problem, IMO, is NOT to go out and sign MORE low-dollar, average-at-all but Great-at-none type players, but rather to acquire one to two DYNAMIC talents especially on the D-Line.

And this notion of "ALL HIGH-PRICED FA's ARE BAD" is REALLY getting old. Maybe instead of judging potential future success based solely off the COST of the player,why not judge potential future success based on the player's SKILL and PRODUCTION?? Such a novel concept, no?

Take a hike, buddy!!! All those High Priced Vets worked out so well in Washington over the years, huh?
Geez, how about some study before spouting....

 

[Manwiththeplan]

It's interesting to see the amount of interest one Brandon Graham gets here, when Anthony Spencer, who was a very similar players was nearly run out of town at a similar point in his career. A matter of fact, Spencer had more sacks through 5 years than Graham.

 

[ShiningStar]

Nope, and we move on.

 

[Nightman]

While I don't have anything against Brandon Graham in particular, I am getting a little irritated of seeing a seemingly limitless amount of these "new-age" Cowboys fans who are a little too aware of the "new and improved" way in which the F.O. operates.

Some of the more common information/insight offered by your "new-age" Cowboys fan usually starts with the popular " they won't sign him bc he will want big bucks" which is almost always followed by the old, "the F.O. now knows that SB-contending teams are only built by going after low-dollar, high-character guys like Mincey and Selvie".

To top it off, your casual, disturbingly-annoying "smart and savvy" new-age Cowboys fan will most likely conclude with a parting shot aimed at those outdated, antiquated Cowboys fans who put forth ridiculous claims such as the Cowboys signing a big-name free-agent for a lucrative-but-fair contract based on the player's assets.

Potential phrases used could stem anywhere from a relatively-new attempt like "Yeah becuz that sure worked well for the 2008 Cowboys, didn't it?!" to a potential GEM like "Sounds like something one of the largely unsuccessful and clueless Cowboys teams of the past would do."

I know, I know, got a little carried away, but good God man, every team NEEDS a couple of those BIG-TIME talents on both sides of the ball, usually at positions like WR, DE, and FS. THIS Cowboys team and more specifically, this DEFENSIVE unit, already has WAY too many "low-dollar" guys who are solid at just about everything but not dynamic in any single area. The SOLUTION to this problem, IMO, is NOT to go out and sign MORE low-dollar, average-at-all but Great-at-none type players, but rather to acquire one to two DYNAMIC talents especially on the D-Line.

And this notion of "ALL HIGH-PRICED FA's ARE BAD" is REALLY getting old. Maybe instead of judging potential future success based solely off the COST of the player,why not judge potential future success based on the player's SKILL and PRODUCTION?? Such a novel concept, no?

If we sign a few of our own FAs like McClain, Durant, Spencer and Moore and add in 1-3 Draft picks on the cheap and that's
like 9 positions that are pretty much filled. That would leave SDE, DT and Nickel DB open. Why not spend some money and get a Suh or Hardy instead of settling for average.

I think a lot of people want to find that sleeper to make themselves look good instead of going with the obvious but expensive star. I see it in fantasy sports all the time, where the new guys all get over valued by so much that guys like Romo and Arian Foster can be stolen in later rounds.