Anyone perform better after signing a new contract?

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,487
Reaction score
76,336
Correct. Look at a couple players we paid:

Jaylon: Could only turn one way.
Crawford: Rotational type we paid as a starter.
Diggs: Good playmaker, but poor in coverage.
Dak: Can't read a D, especially post snap.
Zeke: He was still under contract and a decline was coming.
DLaw: Good player, but we paid him like a top 5 player, which he isn't. Also needed surgery which he refused until we signed him. Sick.
Lamb: Good player, just not worth 2nd best in the NFL contract.
Matin: Declining player. Should've been traded

That is a lot of bad contracts just in the last few years.


Martin deal was a bargain.
Dak deal was a good one he was A All Pro.
Lawrence….if we are saying maintain then he stayed the same. He should’ve never got 100 million but they got what they wanted.
Too early on Lamb.
Zeke deal was stupid.
Diggs too early. He’s been hurt since signing his deal.

I don’t even remember what Crawford or Jaylen got to care lol.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,963
Reaction score
50,812
Martin deal was a bargain.
Dak deal was a good one he was A All Pro.
Lawrence….if we are saying maintain then he stayed the same. He should’ve never got 100 million but they got what they wanted.
Too early on Lamb.
Zeke deal was stupid.
Diggs too early. He’s been hurt since signing his deal.

I don’t even remember what Crawford or Jaylen got to care lol.
18 mil/season for aging OG is a good deal?

Dak's deal was terrible, you are like one of 3 people on this earth who think it was a good deal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,487
Reaction score
76,336
18 mil/season for aging OG is a good deal?

Dak's deal was terrible, you are like one of 3 people on this earth who think it was a good deal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zack Martin deal was 14 AAV and Daks was 40. Those were not bad deals. Martin’s was a bargain.
 
Top