Anyone Think We Beat Seattle?

RunDMC

RunDMC

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
2,286
Amy50632 said:
If we lose against Seattle, tank and get good draft picks!
Click to expand...

No. We do not tank.

Even if we lose against Seattle you still have the Eagles at home and a road game at Tampa Bay.

4-5 by Romo's return still gives us a chance.
 
CATCH17

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,666
Reaction score
86,212
A Giants loss is just as good as a Cowboys win from this point forward until Romo is back imo.
 
windward

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,541
EGTuna said:
Nope. Not this team. They have 0 confidence, and can't create turnovers unless they have a lead, which won't happen. Sigh. 2016 is where my hope lies, because 2015 has 5-11 or 6-10 written all over it. Snake. Bit.

Look on the bright side, Dallas might be in a position to draft Ezekiel Elliot. So, there's that.
Click to expand...

If we end up 6-10 or 5-11, I seriously hope we consider drafting a QB like Paxton Lynch since who knows when we will have the opportunity to take a guy in the Top 10 again?
 
31smackdown

31smackdown

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
223
Get ready for 35 scramble drills.. every time Wilson has gone back to pass this year it has looked like a school yard play. I said out loud last week that Seattle is going to get him hurt back there before the season is over. He holds the ball forever trying to make a play. So he is either going to scramble for a bunch of yards and make us sick or there are going to be a lot of big negative plays available when Dallas is on D. You are going to need to make a real throw or two at some point against that team and it's those 2-3 throws that Cassel will need to make to win this game. So yes, definitely winnable based on what I have seen from Seattle so far this year.
 
CowboyStar88

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,178
Reaction score
25,570
rocyaice said:
I agree that makes us a terrible team so I don't understand why people feel like we are underachieving? Bad teams committ penalties. Bad teams find ways to lose. You can't win in this league without a quarterback. You just can't. Many have tried. Some have gotten lucky do to having the best defense in the league. But you can't go out there with a backup quarterback and backup receivers out here and expect to get a solid product. To their credit they have probably gotten more out of this team than they should've.
Click to expand...

That is kinda my point... I think there are deeper issues on this team than Romo and Dez, and they have been masked because of those 2 keeping us in games. There is no reason a team with the talent this team has on the Oline TE LB DE and Crawford at tackle, and a couple of Solid Corner in Mo/White/Jones and a solid kicked can't when a game. It's baffling to me, and if you consider Bease, Williams and DMC to have decent talent that should be able to muster up 1 or 2 wins and they haven't been able to. That's why I think this team has deeper issues other than missing Dez and Romo
 
windward

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,689
Reaction score
4,541
RunDMC said:
No. We do not tank.

Even if we lose against Seattle you still have the Eagles at home and a road game at Tampa Bay.

4-5 by Romo's return still gives us a chance.
Click to expand...

They won't tank even if they are 3-9.
 
tomsanders921

tomsanders921

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,183
Reaction score
4,753
RunDMC said:
No. We do not tank.

Even if we lose against Seattle you still have the Eagles at home and a road game at Tampa Bay.

4-5 by Romo's return still gives us a chance.
Click to expand...


This. 2-5 looks bad but the bottom line is we need 2 of the next , preferably with one of them against the eagles. So we don't tank unless we lose the next two. If we lose to Seattle and then beat Philly, we go into the Tampa game thinking with a win we r in great shape when romo comes back the following week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top