Anyone Watch PTI?

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,978
Reaction score
11,733
Guess not nobody caught it today. Both applauded Romo for stepping up to hold on FGs.
 
Romo's holds might be the difference between us winning a game down the stretch, particularly New Orleans. I think it's going to be a close one.
 
Much ado about very little. If the kicker keeps missing, we know where the problem lies.
 
I've never been a fan of the punter holding on kicks.

If something goes wrong, there needs to be a guy that can 1) Not panic 2) not do something stupid like chuck a ball straight up in the air and/or 3) improvise and get the ball forward to a 1st down or the endzone.

I think a QB is always the best option as a holder. I'm not sold on our starting QB being the holder, but if he feels that's what he has to do to make this team succeed, then I'm behind Romo 100%
 
RS12;3136116 said:
Much ado about very little. If the kicker keeps missing, we know where the problem lies.

Ya, with either the kicker or the holder.
 
I try to avoid ESPN talk shows when I hear stuff like this yesterday; "There's a 0% chance Romo's going to fumble a snap. He might throw a pick six in the endzone, but he's not fumbling another field goal snap."
 
8FOR!3;3136554 said:
I try to avoid ESPN talk shows when I hear stuff like this yesterday; "There's a 0% chance Romo's going to fumble a snap. He might throw a pick six in the endzone, but he's not fumbling another field goal snap."

I think the point was that Romo might make mistakes but he will not make that specific mistake again.

They were totally behind the move.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,778
Messages
13,897,267
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top