Apparently, the Bucs love Ramsey. I think a trade makes sense with them.

EMMITTnROY

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,133
Reaction score
6,831
I did a Google search and the Bucs love Ramsey. And their biggest need is a CB. Jameis Winston even said he'd take a pay cut to be able to play with his former teammate again.

They are in the prime position for us to trade with. They sit at #9, one spot ahead of the first team likely to take Ezekiel Elliott, the Giants.

It just makes too much sense for both teams. A swap gets both teams exactly who they want. If the Bucs give us their second rounder (#38 overall), I think that's fair value for both teams.

The Cowboys could grab their guy at the perfect position and pick up an early 2nd rounder as well.

It's the most logical and realistic trade scenario I can think of for Dallas. It's a win win for both teams.
 
word is Cleveland really likes Elliott may not make it to 9
 
I did a Google search and the Bucs love Ramsey. And their biggest need is a CB. Jameis Winston even said he'd take a pay cut to be able to play with his former teammate again.

They are in the prime position for us to trade with. They sit at #9, one spot ahead of the first team likely to take Ezekiel Elliott, the Giants.

It just makes too much sense for both teams. A swap gets both teams exactly who they want. If the Bucs give us their second rounder (#38 overall), I think that's fair value for both teams.

The Cowboys could grab their guy at the perfect position and pick up an early 2nd rounder as well.

It's the most logical and realistic trade scenario I can think of for Dallas. It's a win win for both teams.

I agree. If Dallas likes Ramsey, Bosa, and Elliot evenly they should trade down a few spots and get an extra 2nd. I would target the Ravens and Jacksonville.
 
We may make some moves in the 2nd and 3rd round as teams want to get value for their picks. I can even see someone trading up in the 2nd round and giving up a 2017 pick, but this team has so many holes that I don't know if that is the most prudent move, but worth thinking about..
 
You cannot ever trade back with one player in mind. You better have several you are OK taking at that spot. What is stopping the Giants from trading up to 7 or 8?

This. You trade back because you don't have 1 player in mind but a few options with similar grade/projected impact. Honestly I doubt elliot lasts to #9. Cleveland and Baltimore both are rumored to be high on him.
 
An extra second is huge given the amount of holes on this roster, although what they would do with it is a big question. Do they use it on a TE then don't play him?

In that case, let's stay at 4.
 
Don't see him making it past No. 3. Whether that means the Chargers take him or someone trades up for him.

What a weird draft....no one wants to be in the Top 5 that actually is in the Top 5.
 
I agree. If Dallas likes Ramsey, Bosa, and Elliot evenly they should trade down a few spots and get an extra 2nd. I would target the Ravens and Jacksonville.

To me Jacksonville has no reason to trade. I think their #1 target is Jack. They can stay at 5 and get him. If latest smoke is true, Dallas doesn't see Ramsey as a CB, so I think it's down to Bosa/Elliot is they stay at #4.
 
To me Jacksonville has no reason to trade. I think their #1 target is Jack. They can stay at 5 and get him. If latest smoke is true, Dallas doesn't see Ramsey as a CB, so I think it's down to Bosa/Elliot is they stay at #4.

I just want to find a way to get a extra second so we can replace the weed brothers at DE.
 
So Tampa trades up 5 spots and we only get a 2nd, but Philly trades up 6 spots and Clev gets a coup?? No thank you on that trade I want more.

Me too. Want almost what Clev got but won't get it.
 
So Tampa trades up 5 spots and we only get a 2nd, but Philly trades up 6 spots and Clev gets a coup?? No thank you on that trade I want more.

If you can get the guy you want, and get a premium pick for it why wouldn't you trade?
 
I'd definitely want more than just their second round pick. Maybe their second, Glennon + a mid, late rounder.
 
I'd definitely want more than just their second round pick. Maybe their second, Glennon + a mid, late rounder.

thats insane. No way that'll happen. they wanted a second just for Glennon and it has been reported they wold take a third. So why would they give there first a second, essentially a third in Glennon and a mid, late rounder. asking for too much.
 
Possible picks at 9 in the case of a trade down would be Elliot, Lawson, Treadwell and I would be targeting Rankins.
 
So Tampa trades up 5 spots and we only get a 2nd, but Philly trades up 6 spots and Clev gets a coup?? No thank you on that trade I want more.

Cleveland's pick was worth 2600 points and ours is worth 1800. On top of that philly traded up for a QB and TB would be trading for a DB.
 
thats insane. No way that'll happen. they wanted a second just for Glennon and it has been reported they wold take a third. So why would they give there first a second, essentially a third in Glennon and a mid, late rounder. asking for too much.

If you're not going into the process with the idea of getting more than the pick is worth, you're absolutely doing it wrong. That probably was a little right, but there is also no chance they're getting a second rounder for Glennon. They might be able to get a third for him, but my guess is they outright cut him after the draft if he's not traded, so he's really just fodder. How about

#4 and one of our 4th round comps
for
#9, Glennon and their 3rd?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,563
Messages
14,545,796
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top