Eskimo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,821
- Reaction score
- 496
I know people give a lot of credit to BP for improving the talent level of this team but I think it would be difficult for anyone to do worse than the former regime run by Jones/Lacewell. I think it is only in comparison to the previous regime that we think BP has done well. Let's take a look at his first day performance in his 4 years here. I have highlighted what I believe the good picks were (and I have been generous here):
2003:
T-New: good player, but a #5 pick should be a Pro Bowl player and rightly or wrongly he has only made the Pro Bowl as an alternate. His ball skills are poor.
Al Johnson: backup OL - bad pick.
Jason Witten: Pro Bowl TE and Parcells best pick overall.
2004:
Julius: starter, good running back but not a star
Jacob Rogers: monumental bust
Stephen Peterman = bust
2005:
Ware = Pro Bowler, Parcells 2nd best pick
Spears = below average starter
Burnett = nickel LB, too small to play in this scheme, poor pick in 2nd round
Henson = bust
2006:
Carpenter = future starter, looked solid at end of season, unlikely to be an impact player
Fasano = backup TE, okay blocker, underwhelming receiver, doesn't look like he will be a big contributor
Hatcher = backup, has potential, good pick
So overall, only 6 of the 13 picks look like real keepers so far. Now I haven't charted what other teams have done but I suspect this performance really isn't much better than what an average GM would have done with a similar alotment of picks.
Now I will agree that Parcells has probably done better than average with his second day picks but most of those guys are depth type guys and not impact players. He does deserve some kudos for Romo but his play deteriorated significantly over time so we will have to see how he adjusts to how the league has adjusted to him before we know what we have with him.
2003:
T-New: good player, but a #5 pick should be a Pro Bowl player and rightly or wrongly he has only made the Pro Bowl as an alternate. His ball skills are poor.
Al Johnson: backup OL - bad pick.
Jason Witten: Pro Bowl TE and Parcells best pick overall.
2004:
Julius: starter, good running back but not a star
Jacob Rogers: monumental bust
Stephen Peterman = bust
2005:
Ware = Pro Bowler, Parcells 2nd best pick
Spears = below average starter
Burnett = nickel LB, too small to play in this scheme, poor pick in 2nd round
Henson = bust
2006:
Carpenter = future starter, looked solid at end of season, unlikely to be an impact player
Fasano = backup TE, okay blocker, underwhelming receiver, doesn't look like he will be a big contributor
Hatcher = backup, has potential, good pick
So overall, only 6 of the 13 picks look like real keepers so far. Now I haven't charted what other teams have done but I suspect this performance really isn't much better than what an average GM would have done with a similar alotment of picks.
Now I will agree that Parcells has probably done better than average with his second day picks but most of those guys are depth type guys and not impact players. He does deserve some kudos for Romo but his play deteriorated significantly over time so we will have to see how he adjusts to how the league has adjusted to him before we know what we have with him.