DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 59,982
- Reaction score
- 48,729
I think if you look at the numbers they can deceive you into thinking that a high percentage checkdown is a viable option in lieu of a running game.
I think those statistics only look good on paper. I think that while running the ball yields less yards on average than a checkdown it provides a dimension to an offense that opens things down the field in the passing game, gets tough first downs, and helps you score in the redzone.
We're about equal to our opponents in terms of first downs in the air, but we're completely dwarfed when it comes to rushing first downs.
I think our inability to run the ball effectively and consistently is why we lose close games. (In tandem with poor clock management by Garrett).
I agree.
The ability to run--or at least make the defesne soemwhat fear the run--can correlate directly a team's ability to go deeper down field in the passing game.
The less fear of a run game, the less likely you will be able get open deep or have time to have those plays develope.
Watch Aaron Rodgers or Drew Brees' play action effeciency for exhibit 1and 1A. As long as they at least fear the run, you don't really have to run it all that much.