WV Cowboy;3718476 said:Are the odds better to try a 59 yd FG, ... or go for it on 4th and 10?
I think I might have looked for Witten for the 1st down, .. they seemed to be having trouble covering him there at the end.
Well, we know what Garrett thinks now and since he is the one making those calls........WV Cowboy;3718476 said:Are the odds better to try a 59 yd FG, ... or go for it on 4th and 10?
I think I might have looked for Witten for the 1st down, .. they seemed to be having trouble covering him there at the end.
Don Corleone;3718495 said:I would have liked them to stay agressive and dink and dunk their way to a TD. There was enough time and two TO's left on the clock. I didn't understand the play calling at the end, or at least the execution of the play calling. Witten was getting 9 or 10 a pop. We had 40 yards to go with over a minute left and 2 timeouts. That is enough time to dink and dunk to the endzone. Garrett seemed to imply in his presser that they were going for the FG to tie. I don't really understand why.
WV Cowboy;3718476 said:Are the odds better to try a 59 yd FG, ... or go for it on 4th and 10?
I think I might have looked for Witten for the 1st down, .. they seemed to be having trouble covering him there at the end.
Bluestang;3718508 said:So you keep running the same plays over and over until you get to the redzone?
Defenses key in on tendencies...and NO is pretty good in that department.
The more aggressive you get in those situations the less likely you are to pull it off because the D knows what you are going to do.
Wood;3718519 said:it was the right call. Thats the only reason Dallas is still holding on to Buehler is his ability to hit those long kicks. I am getting the sense that Red is losing confidence in Beuhler.
Wood;3718519 said:it was the right call. Thats the only reason Dallas is still holding on to Buehler is his ability to hit those long kicks. I am getting the sense that Red is losing confidence in Beuhler.
