ARTICLE: Death of the Strongside Linebacker by John Clayton

Natedawg44

Active Member
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
0
Speedy WLBs coveted during draft, free agencyBy John Clayton
ESPN.com
Archive

An interesting evolution is happening at the outside linebacker position.

Thirteen of the 25 teams playing 4-3 defenses made moves to acquire weakside linebackers this offseason. Much of the change relates to the popularity of Tony Dungy's Cover 2 defense, which asks for more speed and playmaking ability from defenders. The entire NFC North, which features three new head coaches, is going to the Cover 2 to keep up with Bears coach Lovie Smith, a Dungy disciple while an assistant at Tampa Bay.



AP Photo
The Lions took Ernie Sims with the No. 9 overall pick in the draft.With what was considered the best draft class of linebackers in years, the Packers selected A.J. Hawk, the Lions took Ernie Sims and the Vikings drafted Chad Greenway. All three are natural weakside linebackers because of their speed. In today's game, the prototype outside linebacker destined for the weakside is about 235 pounds and runs a 4.6 in the 40-yard dash. In the case of Sims, the Lions didn't care that he was only 5-foot-11. In the Dungy Cover 2, lack of height means nothing. Speed is everything.

Defensive coordinators have nicknamed the weakside linebacker the "Will." Well, where there is a Will, there is a new way.

"You want as much speed as possible on defense," Panthers general manager Marty Hurney said. "Overall, speed at the linebacker position has been increasing. Speed is the name of the game now."

Speed is the reason the Panthers took James Anderson of Virginia Tech in the third round. He runs a 4.59 in the 40 and weighs just 229 pounds. Coach John Fox will use Anderson's rookie season to groom him to be a weakside linebacker. The Raiders drafted Thomas Howard of UTEP in the second round. He has 4.42 speed, ideal for the Will. The Commanders traded up in the second round to get their weakside linebacker of the future, Rocky McIntosh, who has 4.63 speed.

Because the weakside linebacker plays on the opposite side of the field as the tight end, he isn't bothered as much by big blockers. Offenses tend to run plays to the tight end side, away from the weakside linebackers, which is why faster linebackers can make up more ground and make plays. Plus, they are a threat to blitz and are used to cover the deep zone in pass defense.

"I see a time pretty soon where you are going to see three linebackers on the field who will pretty much all look the same," Titans general manager Floyd Reese said. "Those old 6-4, 255-pound strongside linebackers are being weeded out and being replaced by faster guys. Pretty soon, you are going to see three linebackers out there who aren't going to be as big but are out there because of speed."

The change is happening at a lightning pace. The Panthers scratched their heads when their weakside linebacker, Will Witherspoon, went to the St. Louis Rams and was installed at middle linebacker after signing a six-year, $33 million contract. He's 6-1 and 231 pounds, but he's fast. Speed is needed to cover that deep zone, and the Rams already have a weakside linebacker: 5-10, 231-pound Dexter Coakley. Pisa Tinoisamoa (6-1, 235) plays on the strong side.

St. Louis is one of the first teams to have three weakside-type guys starting at all three linebacker positions. But it won't be the last.

Reese is guiding the transition with his Titans. He drafted 235-pound Keith Bulluck in 2000 even though he had that dreaded tag of not taking on blocks. Bulluck made plays because of his speed and quickness and established himself as a Pro Bowler, the ideal weakside linebacker. During the offseason, the Titans signed former Colt David Thornton, whom Dungy groomed to be a Derrick Brooks-like weakside linebacker.

What do you do with two weakside linebackers? Simple. Bulluck plays right outside linebacker and Thornton plays on the left. They can make plays from either side of the field regardless of what offenses do with the tight end. Coach Jeff Fisher knows he has two quick linebackers who can make plays on the outside.

"The Tampa 2 enables a team to play with seven defenders in the box and be able to play coverage," Reese said. "It becomes demanding because the linebackers have to have speed to help with the coverage. When you hear people talking about needing more speed on defense, they start at linebacker, and that usually means the weakside linebacker position."

Dungy's defense is revolutionizing the league because it's allowing coaches to use personnel in a variety of ways. A big college safety can put on a few pounds and be a weakside linebacker. The Colts won 14 games last season with a 5-11, 235-pound middle linebacker, Gary Brackett.

And the evolution isn't stopping at linebacker. Weakside linebacker bodies are taking over the strongside position. Those 6-4, 255-pound strongside linebackers are getting a try at defensive end if they have the quickness to get to the quarterback. Dungy is taking some 265- to 275-pound defensive ends and putting them at tackle to take advantage of their quickness. Dungy, like Bill Belichick and others, has turned cornerbacks into safeties and switched them back when necessary.

NFL defenses are geared more toward speed, and the pace is quickening. When in doubt, teams will draft a quick defender ahead of an offensive skill player because speedy defenders are harder to find as the draft proceeds. Still, the weakside linebacker position is the gateway to beginning the process of overhauling a slow defense.

If that weakside linebacker is slow, he better move to the strong side. And if he's still too slow at strongside linebacker, he better move off the field.

Julian Peterson
Linebacker
Seattle Seahawks

Profile
2005 SEASON STATISTICS
Tot Ast Solo FF Sack Int
83 58 25 1 3 0

The Seahawks spent $54 million to get a weakside linebacker, Julian Peterson, who has the speed to cover a tight end or a halfback. The Giants are thinking about putting LaVar Arrington on the strong side, but he's one of those rare weakside linebackers who is big enough to knock down tackles yet fast enough to get to the quarterback.

Whether it's weak side or strong side, the evolution at linebacker has everything to do with speed, and in reality those positions are becoming interchangeable. It won't be long before moving to the strong side will be considered a sign that a player is losing a step because of the extra speed required on the weak side. But, eventually, offenses will adjust to the increasing speed and smaller defensive bodies running around.

"Eventually, teams will line up in two-tight-end sets and pound the ball with the running game," Reese said.

Until then, enjoy the speed
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
All that applies to 4-3 defenses... not 3-4 defenses. You gotta have big LB's for the 34.
 

bobtheflob

New Member
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
This trend sounds like good news to teams in a 3-4 defense. It means that more large linebacker types will be available to them.

Although I've also heard stories about how popular the 3-4 is becoming these days. Is it just that teams are pciking one extreme or another?
 

Shadowfax

Well-Known Member
Messages
214
Reaction score
331
Uh, I think Jimmie Johnson made this famous in Big D before Dungy started using his cover 2.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
Seems like those ole' antiquated sticks in the mud like Pittsburgh and New England have been doing just fine recently. If I were writing an article about the trend of dominating NFL defenses, I'm not sure I would use the Colts, Rams and Titans as my examples.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
Shadowfax said:
Uh, I think Jimmie Johnson made this famous in Big D before Dungy started using his cover 2.
Ding ding we have a winner

Jimmy always had a theory speed could make up for the mental break down or errors that happen in games
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,123
Reaction score
11,477
InmanRoshi said:
Seems like those ole' antiquated sticks in the mud like Pittsburgh and New England have been doing just fine recently. If I were writing an article about the trend of dominating NFL defenses, I'm not sure I would use the Colts, Rams and Titans as my examples.
No kidding...

Odd timing for this article when the dramatic trend the last couple of years has been to more 34 defenses.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,957
Reaction score
23,104
Jimmy also moved big LBs to end and Big ends to DTs going back to when he coached in college.

ex. with the Cowboys(Tony Tolbert)
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
InmanRoshi said:
I'm not sure I would use the Colts, Rams and Titans as my examples.

:laugh2: :laugh2:

No kidding! I really, really hope the NFL is moving in this direction for their defenses. It'll make getting our type of guys that much easier and it'll make us look brilliant for moving to the two TE set as our base.

*crosses fingers*
 

Hater

New Member
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
AsthmaField said:
All that applies to 4-3 defenses... not 3-4 defenses. You gotta have big LB's for the 34.

Exactly...

It is also worth noting that two of the teams that article talks about, the Colts and the Rams, run pass-oriented offenses that are constant quick-strike threats. It's only logical for Dungy to assemble the defense he has; why would he want a 3-4 with a stifling run defense if their opponents are primarily passing the ball and playing catch-up? Dungy has always done a good job of creating defensive units that complement the strengths and weaknesses of his offenses.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
Chocolate Lab said:
No kidding...

Odd timing for this article when the dramatic trend the last couple of years has been to more 34 defenses.
The other trend has been to the Tampa 2; probably as many or more teams have switched to that defense in recent years. The old 46 defense (Buddy Ryan's D) is losing the popularity it gained after the '85 Bears used it so well.

The 3-4 and the Tampa 2 are on opposite ends of the spectrum. The 3-4 uses the bigger stronger LB’s across the board where the Tampa 2 uses the smaller faster LB’s. Jimmy Johnson’s Defense (Dave Wienstadt, Butch Davis, etc.) was somewhat akin to the Tampa 2 in that it relied on speed.

Personally I have always preferred the speed defenses but you can't deny the effectiveness of a well run 3-4. So I am not going to complain about our D.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Hater said:
Exactly...

It is also worth noting that two of the teams that article talks about, the Colts and the Rams, run pass-oriented offenses that are constant quick-strike threats. It's only logical for Dungy to assemble the defense he has; why would he want a 3-4 with a stifling run defense if their opponents are primarily passing the ball and playing catch-up? Dungy has always done a good job of creating defensive units that complement the strengths and weaknesses of his offenses.



Why? Cuz the best way to attack a team like the colts is to pound the ball and keep their offense off the field.


Either way EVERY defense needs to be able to stop the run and pass if they want to be of championship caliber. You can get by with being mediocre vs the run in the regular season, but come playoffs you'll get your *** ran the **** over.



The colts actually did ok vs the run against the Steelers this year, but it didn't discourage them from continuing to pound the ball on them (42 rush attempts). Why is that? They steelers only averaged 2.7 yards per carry in the game. Oh, they kept pounding it cuz it kept the Colts offense on the sidelines. The Steelers held a near 9 minute advantage in T.O.P.


Edit: Of course I wasn't referring specifically to the 3-4 part I bolded. I was referring to the "stiffling run D" part.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Natedawg44 said:
Defensive coordinators have nicknamed the weakside linebacker the "Will."

Any doubt as to Clayton's knowledge about football has just been eradicated... You don't get this type of insight from most football journalists. Seriously, no one knows about the "Will" linebacker ... oh yeah, unless they played any sort of organized football during their life...:lmao::lmao:
 

J-DOG

Active Member
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
0
InmanRoshi said:
Seems like those ole' antiquated sticks in the mud like Pittsburgh and New England have been doing just fine recently. If I were writing an article about the trend of dominating NFL defenses, I'm not sure I would use the Colts, Rams and Titans as my examples.
Agree with you.
Another example of Clayton missing the point completely.
I think the trend will be for 3-4 defenses in the future.
I did like reading that about the 2TE set though.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
J-DOG said:
Agree with you.
Another example of Clayton missing the point completely.
I think the trend will be for 3-4 defenses in the future.
I did like reading that about the 2TE set though.


:hammer:


He made it sound like this is some recent happening or something.


BREAKING NEWS:

Teams across the NFL has just decided that the Middle Linebacker in a 4-3 defense will now be referred to as the "Mike". Details of this story to be released later on today.
 

Hater

New Member
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
Why? Cuz the best way to attack a team like the colts is to pound the ball and keep their offense off the field.

Either way EVERY defense needs to be able to stop the run and pass if they want to be of championship caliber. You can get by with being mediocre vs the run in the regular season, but come playoffs you'll get your *** ran the **** over.

The colts actually did ok vs the run against the Steelers this year, but it didn't discourage them from continuing to pound the ball on them (42 rush attempts). Why is that? They steelers only averaged 2.7 yards per carry in the game. Oh, they kept pounding it cuz it kept the Colts offense on the sidelines. The Steelers held a near 9 minute advantage in T.O.P.


Edit: Of course I wasn't referring specifically to the 3-4 part I bolded. I was referring to the "stiffling run D" part.

I'm not sure what your disagreement here is... You are certainly correct in saying that the best way to attack the Colts is by keeping their offense off the field through establishing a running game - but that's assuming the Colts aren't already up by 2 touchdowns. I never said why would the Colts want a stifling run defense.. I think any team would love one of those; I was just pointing out that a 3-4 with bigger, slower players is not well suited to the offensive gameplans they are faced with in most weeks. They won every single meaningful game they played in the regular season using Dungy's system, I'm not sure why you are holding up one game (albeit the most meaningful) they lost as proof that their scheme is flawed. You yourself said that their 4-3 was effective in stopping the Steelers running game, what else can you ask of your defense besides limiting the Super Bowl Champs to 2.7 yards a carry on 43 attempts? The Colts lost that game because their offense didn't capitalize when they were on the field, it had nothing to do with their defense.
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,203
Reaction score
3,860
Do the math!

Offense that can run + Defense that can stop the run = WIN
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Hater said:
I'm not sure what your disagreement here is... You are certainly correct in saying that the best way to attack the Colts is by keeping their offense off the field through establishing a running game


That was my point. A smart coach would anticipate how opposing teams are gonna attack them and make adjustments beforehand.


Dungy's style of D does great in the regular season, but come playoffs it won't win for them.


The ideal player would be one that is both big and fast. Instead of just going with the undersized fast guys.


I'm not sure why you are holding up one game (albeit the most meaningful) they lost as proof that their scheme is flawed


Cuz in the playoffs they will face much stronger defenses then they faced in the regular season. They won't have the luxury of a 2 TD lead every playoff game.
 

Hater

New Member
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
Dungy's style of D does great in the regular season, but come playoffs it won't win for them.

Their style of D held Pittsburgh to 21 points, it was their offense that **** the bed (as it has in every playoff loss)

Rack said:
The ideal player would be one that is both big and fast.
What a revelation.

If you know of a bunch of guys who not only have the speed and versatility of the Colts defense combined with the size and strength of the prototypical 3-4 personnel, I'm sure Tony Dungy (and 31 others) would love to hear from you...

Rack said:
Cuz in the playoffs they will face much stronger defenses then they faced in the regular season.

The "much stronger defense" they faced in the post-season this year being the same D they dismantled (in Pittsburgh) in week 12? Their loss in the playoffs had everything to do with being unable to protect Manning. You yourself said their undersized 4-3 adequately handled the Steelers running offense... I'm not sure how bigger players on the defensive side of the ball would have helped them out.

Rack said:
They won't have the luxury of a 2 TD lead every playoff game.

You're right, they won't. But if you look at the 13 meaningful regular season games they played, and the 1 playoff game, you'll find that they played with a lead a hell of a lot more often than they did not. Whether or not you care to admit it, their "undersized" 4-3 was instrumental in getting them to the playoffs. And in their final game, you cannot convincingly argue that their defense was responsible for the loss.

You can dislike the 4-3, you can dislike defenses that use smaller, faster players, but you can't legitimately construe the Colt's abberational offensive collapse in the Divisional playoff as being related to their defensive scheme.
 
Top