Staxxxx
Member
- Messages
- 293
- Reaction score
- 19
Full Story
This is not a very flattering article toward Kiffin but certainly worth a read. I'm only posting a few excerpts here that stand out to me but because I already had a few concerns about bringing Kiffin I'm probably being a little biased in my selection. I recommend clicking on the link and reading the whole article.
This is not a very flattering article toward Kiffin but certainly worth a read. I'm only posting a few excerpts here that stand out to me but because I already had a few concerns about bringing Kiffin I'm probably being a little biased in my selection. I recommend clicking on the link and reading the whole article.
Let’s start with Monte Kiffin’s “resignation.” Understand this: the fact that he was allowed to leave ostensibly on his own terms was a gesture of respect to the father of USC head coach Lane Kiffin, and not a choice Kiffin had say in. Over the last month of the season, it became the program’s worst-kept secret that Monte Kiffin was on the way out and a replacement was heading in. So while Kiffin’s resume is unmatched as a defensive coordinator, just keep in mind that this is also a coach who a major college program felt it would be better off without.
But, after watching the last three seasons of Kiffin’s defensive game-planning, it’s the schemes that are of much greater concern. It’s certainly understandable why the architect of the Tampa 2 would be reluctant to deviate from a defense he created and changed the sport with, but in his USC tenure Kiffin was almost comically obstinate. Not only did Kiffin stick to the basic personnel set of his Cover 2 the overwhelming majority of the time, but he hardly ever played man, either, in spite of him having the conference’s best cover corner in Nickell Robey (what that means for Mo Claiborne and Brandon Carr, who knows?).
When the going got tough, Kiffin’s recourse was to stick it out and hope that the other team would eventually play into his defense rather than adjusting to their attack. Too often, that approach failed. Case in point, against UCLA, redshirt freshman Brett Hundley connected on 15 of his first 17 passes, most of which came on the same combination of easy swing passes or throws over the middle of the zone. That pattern repeated itself over the course of the entire game, in spite of his line being unable to generate much of a pass rush without blitz help or that freshman quarterback finding the same windows over and over again.
Speaking in Kiffin’s favor, there is this: though: the players do like Monte the person. He still is a great teacher, still hands-on, and emphasizes explaining the concepts over yelling at his charges. Such an approach will likely work even better back in the NFL with grown men instead of college kids. The problem is the concepts he’s teaching and espousing increasingly appeared obsolete in the face of newer, faster, smarter offenses.
