At the rate it is going 10-6 may get #1 seed

So true. What a year for us to pick to suck. Had we taken care of business and won the games we should've won, we'd have a great shot at home field advantage in the playoffs. Barring the penalties and turnovers, we would be sitting at 5-0 right now. Oh well, woulda, coulda, shoulda.
 
10-6 could get you a bye for sure, I think.

This conference is wide open, and one major reason that it is so wide open is due to Dallas' over whelming under-achievement.
 
No kidding. Cleveland pounds the aints?
 
Might even be 9-7. I'm not convinced that the Giants, Deadskins or Eagirlz aren't gonna get atleast 4 more losses.
 
Star4Ever;3642432 said:
So true. What a year for us to pick to suck. Had we taken care of business and won the games we should've won, we'd have a great shot at home field advantage in the playoffs. Barring the penalties and turnovers, we would be sitting at 5-0 right now. Oh well, woulda, coulda, shoulda.

We probably have a better chance at doing something in the postseason, not having HFA.
 
ShiningStar;3642437 said:
anyone else irked we missed on Pouncy?

You realize he was picked before cowboys even got a chance right? If we are going that way, then I am irked we missed on Iupati/Anthony Davis too.
 
RCowboyFan;3642867 said:
You realize he was picked before cowboys even got a chance right? If we are going that way, then I am irked we missed on Iupati/Anthony Davis too.

amazing isnt it?
 
RCowboyFan;3642867 said:
You realize he was picked before cowboys even got a chance right? If we are going that way, then I am irked we missed on Iupati/Anthony Davis too.

I wouldn't take him over Dez anyway.
 
Star4Ever;3642432 said:
So true. What a year for us to pick to suck. Had we taken care of business and won the games we should've won, we'd have a great shot at home field advantage in the playoffs. Barring the penalties and turnovers, we would be sitting at 5-0 right now. Oh well, woulda, coulda, shoulda.

You think we suck? If we really sucked would it matter if the top 2 seeds had no less than 12 wins or 10?

I think what you're trying to say is we picked a terrible year to get off to a bad start.

I disagree. This might be the best year in the NFC to get off to such a bad start, provided we do turn it around.

We could be a very hot 10-6 NFC East champ sitting on a bye. I don't think we've had a 10 win top 2 seed in either conference since the NFL went to this format.
 
Right now, we are closer to the #1 pick than we are to the #1 seed.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,371
Messages
14,533,534
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top