Audio: Staubach on QB’ing, Super Bowl, Too Tall Jones

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
Staubach on QB’ing, Super Bowl, Too Tall Jones

By dcfanatic, January 28, 2010 2:46 am


Here's Roger Staubach on The Scott Van Pelt show from earlier today...

Roger Staubach on QB'ing, the Super Bowl and Too Tall Jones

I love hearing a Commanders fan cry about all the times Staubach tormented him by beating the Skins, lol.

I doubt the football writers take those fan votes into consideration to the point that they make a difference on someone getting in or not. Most fans that would be voting on there are only doing so for the guys who played on their favorite team.

Here's the link to go vote by the way - Hall of Fame Fan Voting

Does Ed Jones deserve to be in the Hall of Fame?

He was a 3 time Pro Bowler and one time All Pro. Was a starter for just about all of his 13 year career and finished with 57.5 sacks. Had 19 fumble recoveries and 3 INT's as well.

I say he's a borderline Hall of Famer.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
Agreed on borderline. If he were a player from another team, say Pittsburgh, and got in with those stats we'd cry foul.
 

HoosierCowboy

Put Pearson in the HOF
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
400
Too Tall redirected about 1000 passes and freed up linebackers because he controled about 3 gaps--since he did not get sacks and dance around on the filed, he probably won't get in
 
Messages
629
Reaction score
8
HoosierCowboy;3258650 said:
Too Tall redirected about 1000 passes and freed up linebackers because he controled about 3 gaps--since he did not get sacks and dance around on the filed, he probably won't get in

You are absolutely right! QB's rarely threw short passes to the right! He also took a year off to try out boxing which he loved but he was just too big and clumsy (saw a couple of his fights on TV). Cannot remember if he played on special teams but I would think he would be a force on defense on a field goal situation w/today's sidewinders...............imagine a 6'9" giant in the middle of the line.............wow:D
 

ilovejerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,484
Reaction score
97
dcfanatic;3258577 said:
Staubach on QB’ing, Super Bowl, Too Tall Jones

By dcfanatic, January 28, 2010 2:46 am


Here's Roger Staubach on The Scott Van Pelt show from earlier today...

Roger Staubach on QB'ing, the Super Bowl and Too Tall Jones

I love hearing a Commanders fan cry about all the times Staubach tormented him by beating the Skins, lol.

I doubt the football writers take those fan votes into consideration to the point that they make a difference on someone getting in or not. Most fans that would be voting on there are only doing so for the guys who played on their favorite team.

Here's the link to go vote by the way - Hall of Fame Fan Voting

Does Ed Jones deserve to be in the Hall of Fame?

He was a 3 time Pro Bowler and one time All Pro. Was a starter for just about all of his 13 year career and finished with 57.5 sacks. Had 19 fumble recoveries and 3 INT's as well.

I say he's a borderline Hall of Famer.

I say Too tall should be in there, considering some of the others...but !

Harvey Martin is a HOF ( no doubt about it !)
Sacks 114
Games 158
Interceptions 2

4× Pro Bowl selection (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979)
1× First-team All-Pro selection (1977)
3× Second-team All-Pro selection (1976, 1979, 1982)
NFL 1970s All-Decade Team
NFL Defensive Player of the Year (1977)
Super Bowl XII MVP
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
SaltwaterServr;3258613 said:
Agreed on borderline. If he were a player from another team, say Pittsburgh, and got in with those stats we'd cry foul.

Since much of his career was played before the NFL made sacks an official stat his 57.5 sacks does not look too impressive; however, he really had 106 sacks during his career.

Those 106 sacks is comparable to others DEs that have been elected to the HoF. Lee Roy Selmon(78 1/2 sacks), Elvin Bethea(105 sacks), Howie Long(91 1/2 sacks) and Fred Dean(100 sacks) are all in the HoF.

I am not pushing for Too Tall to be in, but it would not be outrageous to consider it.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
joseephuss;3258900 said:
Since much of his career was played before the NFL made sacks an official stat his 57.5 sacks does not look too impressive; however, he really had 106 sacks during his career.

Those 106 sacks is comparable to others DEs that have been elected to the HoF. Lee Roy Selmon(78 1/2 sacks), Elvin Bethea(105 sacks), Howie Long(91 1/2 sacks) and Fred Dean(100 sacks) are all in the HoF.

I am not pushing for Too Tall to be in, but it would not be outrageous to consider it.

Ed Jones was a much better DE than Fred Dean who was strictly a pass rusher. His ability to bat down passes and force QBs to throw away from him make him a more productive player than Dean.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
It would help if Jerry put him in the ROH, but I could say that about any number of players.
 

Phrozen Phil

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,994
Reaction score
91
THUMPER;3258927 said:
Ed Jones was a much better DE than Fred Dean who was strictly a pass rusher. His ability to bat down passes and force QBs to throw away from him make him a more productive player than Dean.

Terry Bradshaw still has nightmares about Too-Tall. There's a famous picture that makes TB look tiny as TT is about to engulf him.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
Phrozen Phil;3259410 said:
Terry Bradshaw still has nightmares about Too-Tall. There's a famous picture that makes TB look tiny as TT is about to engulf him.

maybe this one

http://img125.*************/img125/4528/photo0002bbbbcg6.jpg
 

rangers71

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
140
SaltwaterServr;3258613 said:
Agreed on borderline. If he were a player from another team, say Pittsburgh, and got in with those stats we'd cry foul.

You are right, but the problem is that if he played for the Steelers he would have ben in a long time ago.
 

rangers71

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
140
bbgun;3259424 said:
maybe this one

http://img125.*************/img125/4528/photo0002bbbbcg6.jpg


Is there any question that this play draws a flag in today's world?
 

jay cee

Active Member
Messages
2,906
Reaction score
3
rangers71;3259782 said:
You are right, but the problem is that if he played for the Steelers he would have ben in a long time ago.

You got that right.:banghead:
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,825
Reaction score
119
ilovejerry;3258876 said:
I say Too tall should be in there, considering some of the others...but !

Harvey Martin is a HOF ( no doubt about it !)
Sacks 114
Games 158
Interceptions 2

4× Pro Bowl selection (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979)
1× First-team All-Pro selection (1977)
3× Second-team All-Pro selection (1976, 1979, 1982)
NFL 1970s All-Decade Team
NFL Defensive Player of the Year (1977)
Super Bowl XII MVP

Harvey Martin not being in the Hall of Fame is a Travesty.

He should be in the Hall PERIOD.

What a load of BS!

And I agree Too Tall should be in too...but there's no doubt about Martin.

display_image.jpg
2447009270_1260af4e50.jpg
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Chuck Howley should have been in long ago. That is worse then Too Tall who should be in. And Harvey is just as big a snub as Howley.
 

rangers71

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
140
jobberone;3259832 said:
I see no reason for a flag there.


No i don't either I just hink that the way we over protect these sissy QB's of today that it would be a flag. In no way shape or form would I agree with it but I betcha it would be to close to the head for today.
 

ilovejerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,484
Reaction score
97
burmafrd;3259824 said:
Chuck Howley should have been in long ago. That is worse then Too Tall who should be in. And Harvey is just as big a snub as Howley.


Chuck Howley Without question.. the HOF writers are full of crap. they hate the Americas team stuff and will never let the deserving cowboys in .Its a damn shame and joke,
 

ilovejerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,484
Reaction score
97
jobberone;3259832 said:
I see no reason for a flag there.

NFL football has totally changed i would say dramatically changed . There's now way a 40 year old QB ( K.WARNER or the beloved b.FARVE ) would last a season in the NFL of yesteryear. The NFL is protecting and changing the game I personally like the old version maybe because i'm an old fart and dont want to see change to help these players extend there careers. if it was good enough for the ole players then its good enough for todays players who by the way retire with a lot and I mean alot more scratch $$$$$
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
rangers71;3259853 said:
No i don't either I just hink that the way we over protect these sissy QB's of today that it would be a flag. In no way shape or form would I agree with it but I betcha it would be to close to the head for today.

You can still hit the QB as long as it's timely and you don't go to the legs or head.

ilovejerry;3259879 said:
NFL football has totally changed i would say dramatically changed . There's now way a 40 year old QB ( K.WARNER or the beloved b.FARVE ) would last a season in the NFL of yesteryear. The NFL is protecting and changing the game I personally like the old version maybe because i'm an old fart and dont want to see change to help these players extend there careers. if it was good enough for the ole players then its good enough for todays players who by the way retire with a lot and I mean alot more scratch $$$$$

I agree its changed but you can still hit the QB.
 
Top