Barnwell: Eagles and Giants among most likely to decline in 2023

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,266
Reaction score
37,864
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Giants I agree. Eagles? Maybe slightly, but even then they should still be one of the top NFC teams. If I was an Eagles fan, my biggest concern would be replacing Sanders with two good but injury prone HB's. But I dont see that as something that would knock them below 11 wins or so
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,944
Reaction score
19,152
I can see that. Everyone talks about what Philly added this year, but ignores the major pieces they lost at the same time. Jalen Carter is an awesome talent, but reality is the guy could win DROY and still not produce at the level Hargrave did a year ago. Two new coordinators and a year of tape on Hurts after his breakout for teams to adjust? They'll still be really good, but I can certainly see some regression with that team.

NY may actually have a better team, but worse results. Can Daniel Jones have another season racking up 700+ yards on the ground and only throwing 5 ints?
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Eagles ranked #1 in terms of most difficult strength of schedule....Cowboys and Giants tied at 4th....so might as well say all 3 teams will decline.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I can see that. Everyone talks about what Philly added this year, but ignores the major pieces they lost at the same time. Jalen Carter is an awesome talent, but reality is the guy could win DROY and still not produce at the level Hargrave did a year ago. Two new coordinators and a year of tape on Hurts after his breakout for teams to adjust? They'll still be really good, but I can certainly see some regression with that team.

NY may actually have a better team, but worse results. Can Daniel Jones have another season racking up 700+ yards on the ground and only throwing 5 ints?
Yet we lost a coordinator and most claim were better for it.

The RBs they replaced are much better.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,483
Reaction score
6,967
Thank for saying it. 7 starters, and both coordinators.
Yep, but still very much hyped. The Super Bowl loser usually regresses for a number of reasons. The Eagles have atleast 9. They'll still be a good team, one that we split with last year, but dont see how they dont regress atleast a little.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,422
Reaction score
72,969
And the Cowboys remain in mediocrity.

Never bad enough or good enough.

Just right there in the middle.
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,029
Yet we lost a coordinator and most claim were better for it.

The RBs they replaced are much better.
That’s because most “experts” and a big chunk of the fanbase kept saying KM’s crap was holding us back.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,944
Reaction score
19,152
Yet we lost a coordinator and most claim were better for it.

The RBs they replaced are much better.
Maybe the Cowboys are better without Moore, maybe they aren't, time will tell. I was a Moore fan but for the Cowboys I can at lease see a path where they can improve on offense, mostly in consistency running the football and reducing turnovers. For Philly on both sides of the football I don't see a coordinator change having much upside as both units were already one of the best in the league, but two coordinator changes and several starters being replaced on defense opens them up to a possible step back at least on one side of the football. Again I think even with them being worst this year they'll still be extremely good and you can almost pencil them in for 10 wins, but it's extremely tough to duplicate a 14 win season with a super bowl appearance.
 
Top