CCBoy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,013
- Reaction score
- 22,608
NFL Draft 2015: Finding Playmaking Defensive Ends For The Dallas Cowboys
By One.Cool.Customer
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015...ding-playmaking-defensive-ends-for-the-dallas
The blue-chip pass rushers will likely be gone by the time the Cowboys are on the clock with their first-round pick. But there are bound to be playmakers available to the Cowboys throughout the draft. Using a metric called the Production Ratio, we try to identify who those playmakers could be.
In 2014, the Cowboys recorded just 28 sacks, the fifth worst value for the team since 1978 when the league moved to a 16-game schedule. 28 sacks are the lowest sack total since a three-year stretch from 2000 - 2002, when the Cowboys recorded 25, 24, 24 sacks the three years en route to three consecutive 5-11 records.
It stands to reason that the Cowboys will want their sack total to increase in 2015, and one way of making that happen is to draft a player who can rush the passer. But finding effective pass rushers in the draft, either at DE or DT, is not an easy thing. If it was, everybody would be doing it.
Over the last few drafts, we've used a metric called the 'Production Ratio' to assess who the potential playmakers in the draft might be. The Production Ratio was initially proposed by NFL.com's Pat Kirwan, and is really a very simple metric that adds up sacks and tackles-for-loss and divides the sum by the number of college games played. The resulting ratio is one tool among many - albeit a pretty good one - that measures the playmaking potential of front five players coming out of college. The Production Ratio is calculated as follows:
PRODUCTION RATIO = (SACKS + TACKLES FOR LOSS) / NUMBER OF GAMES PLAYED
The resulting number basically tells you the frequency of splash plays (sacks or tackles-for-loss) a player recorded per game in the offensive backfield. The ratio is usually calculated over the entire college career of a prospect, but that method can be inaccurate because not every prospect has a four-year career in college. To correct for that, we'll look at two Production Ratios today, one for the entire college career (an indicator of consistency) and one for the last two seasons of a player's college career (an indicator for potential). For the two-year measure, a number above 1.5 is often indicative of premier talent for a pass rusher, a value above 2.0 is truly exceptional.
When we looked at the production ratio for previous draft classes, we saw that the Production Ratio for DEs/OLBs looked like a good indicator for the success of a college player at the NFL level. Of course, there are a multitude of other factors that determine how well a prospect will do both at the college and NFL level, but the correlation between college production and NFL production is strong enough to use it as one of the tools with which to evaluate college prospects.
By chance or by design, the defensive linemen the Cowboys have taken high in the last 10 drafts all have high production ratios in their final two years in college:
PlayerCollege StatsProduction Ratio
YearRound (Pick)PlayerSchoolSacksTFLGamesCollege CareerLast two seasons
20051 (11)DeMarcus WareTroy28.057.0441.932.15
20051 (20)Marcus SpearsLSU15.030.0261.731.73
20063 (92)Jason HatcherGrambling18.531.5281.792.35
20071 (26)Anthony SpencerPurdue21.044.0471.381.90
20123 (81)Tyrone CrawfordBoise State13.527.0261.561.56
20142 (34)DeMarcus LawrenceBoise State19.034.0232.302.30
Again, the mandatory caveat: There are a multitude of factors that determine how well a prospect will do in the NFL. College production is just one of them.
Some of the most successful pass rushers drafted of the last few years have remarkably high production ratios over their last two college years. Aldon Smith (1.96), J.J. Watt (1.85), Von Miller (2.52), Greg Hardy (1.74), Ndamukong Suh (2.07), and Aaron Donald (2.54) all showed outstanding production in college.
But not every successful NFL pass rusher necessarily had prolific college production. Detroit's Ezekiel Ansah has 15.5 sacks in two seasons, yet only had a two-year production ratio of 0.7 in college. In Ansah's case, his exceptional athleticism and physical potential warranted a high draft pick, but in general, teams would be well advised to fully understand the lack of elite-level production before making a selection based largely on physical measurements. Jason Pierre-Paul is often cited as an example of a player taken high based on measurables only, but only people unfamiliar with the Big East actually believe this. Pierre-Paul had a Production Ratio of 1.61 (15.5 TFLs, 5.5 sacks in 13 games) in his one year in South Florida, so while that may have been a low base from which to project his potential, the production was there.
Similarly, not every draft prospect with a high college production ratio will automatically turn into an All Pro pass rusher in the NFL. Last year, Jackson Jeffcoat had the highest production ratio with 2.47. Originally projected to be drafted somewhere in the middle rounds, he went undrafted and was signed by the Seahawks as an undrafted free agents. The Seahawks eventually released him after training camp, and he was signed to Washington's practice squad.
The Production Ratio, like every other stat-based projection tool, is not going to be a perfect predictor of how successful college players are going to be in the NFL. But it does give you something to think about as you evaluate these players and their potential, and it may be one building block in identifying who this year's playmakers will be - and who won't. In a little less than a month, the NFL Combine will provide us with even more metrics, giving us an even bigger data base from which to assess players.
2015 Edge Rusher Prospects
The table below shows the current top-ranked prospects that could potentially play defensive end in a 4-3 scheme. The table is sorted by their CBS Draft Ranking (Rank per January 21st), though you probably shouldn't attach too much weight to these early rankings. The table contains the top 32 defensive end prospects who were given a draftable grade by CBS. For your convenience, the table is sortable (just click on the blue column headers).
PlayerCollege StatsProduction Ratio
RankPlayerSchoolPOSHtWtSacksTFLGamesCollege Career Last two seasons
3Randy GregoryNebraskaDE6-624516.524.5241.711.71
8Shane RayMissouriDE6-324517.534401.291.75
9Dante FowlerFloridaOLB6-226114.534371.311.56
15Vic BeasleyClemsonOLB6-32353352.5481.782.67
17Alvin DupreeKentuckyDE6-426723.537471.291.59
35Arik ArmsteadOregonDE6-7296410.5390.370.46
37Eli HaroldVirginiaOLB6-423517.536.5361.501.88
39Owamagbe OdighizuwaUCLADE6-327012.524.5500.741.00
42Nate OrchardUtahDE6-42552538.5501.272.08
48Hau'oli KikahaWashingtonOLB6-32503651.5441.992.69
51Danielle HunterLSUDE6-62404.521380.670.98
65Mario Edwards Jr.Florida StateDE6-3294823350.891.08
70Markus GoldenMissouriOLB6-326016.533391.271.83
73Trey FlowersArkansasDE6-32701847.5491.341.67
92Za'Darius SmithKentuckyDE6-526410.513.5241.001.00
99Preston SmithMississippi StateDE6-52701627470.911.32
103Lorenzo MauldinLouisvilleOLB6-424321.534491.131.70
108Henry AndersonStanfordDE6-629515.530.5470.981.40
126Anthony ChickilloMiami (Fla.)DE6-428215.525500.810.71
146Cedric ReedTexasDE6-62711731441.091.58
163Corey CrawfordClemsonDE6-52705.524.5510.590.90
179Deion BarnesPenn StateDE6-42551326.5371.070.98
199Martin IfediMemphisDE6-32742235.5461.251.68
225Jermauria RascoLSUDE6-3247171842.50.820.85
226C.J. OlaniyanPenn StateOLB6-3252917.5410.650.98
241Brock HekkingNevadaDE6-32502234491.141.52
257Ray DrewGeorgiaDE6-42847.513460.450.63
263Marcus RushMichigan StateDE6-224318.537.5541.041.13
269Ryan RussellPurdueDE6-42739.524.5500.680.67
281Frank ClarkeMichiganDE6-227011.535.5480.981.54
316James RouseMarshallDE6-52708.525430.781.18
328Brian MihalikBoston CollegeDE6-92888.516430.570.69
There are some guys on here, like Clemson's Vic Beasley and others, whose playing weight may make them more suited to play pass rushing OLBs in a 3-4 scheme. I don't think that a 4-3 DE absolutely has to be a 280-pound guy, But I think 250 is probably the limit at which a 4-3 DE can be effective, and if you're looking for a prototype body, Alvin Dupree at 6-4, 267 is probably that guy - especially if you're looking for a left defensive end (to play opposite of DeMarcus Lawrence) where stopping the run is also a key consideration.
Vic Beasley, Hau'oli Kikaha, and Markus Golden are three of the obvious standouts on this list from a pure Production Ratio point of view, but all three probably project better as 3-4 OLBs than as 43 DEs.
Randy Gregory and Shane Ray are intriguing prospects for a 4-3 defense, but both will likely be long gone by the time the Cowboys are on the board with the 27th pick. But there'll be plenty of exciting prospects left for the Cowboys to choose from, including Nate Orchard and Alvin Dupree.
In 2012, Chandler Jones entered the league with a modest production ratio of 1.28, yet he leads all 2012 rookies with 23.5 total sacks over his three years in the NFL. Which just goes to show that pure athleticism can be just as important as college production.
I have not included some notable standouts like Lynden Trail (Norfolk State, 1.56 production ratio), Zach Wagenman (Montana, 2.41), Ryan Delaire (Towson, 2.02), or Shaquille Riddick (West Virginia, 1.81), because they spent most or all of their time at small schools where they did not face the same level of competition as the players listed in the table above. And while their numbers look very good, they probably won't translate easily to the NFL.
Remember when the Cowboys signed Prairie View standout Adrian Hamilton as an UDFA in 2012 on the strength of the 22 sacks he had notched in his senior season? The Cowboys ended up releasing him, as they saw that he wasn't particularly effective against the run and didn't have a lot of pass rush moves. The Ravens picked him up and he played ten snaps for them in 2012, spent 2013 on IR and was released in the summer of 2014. The Chargers picked him up for training camp and released him before the season started. Hamilton exemplifies the tough road to the NFL most small school prospects face.
Overall, the 2015 draft class does not look as chock full of pass rushers with great potential as some of the recent draft classes have. And sitting at No. 27, the Cowboys will not have the luxury of waiting until one of the consensus top talents falls into their laps, complete with a sterling production ratio, phenomenal athleticism and perfect measurables. That's simply not going to happen.
Instead, they'll have to figure out which of the many prospects available can be the most productive in the Cowboys' scheme, and that may be an entirely different question than whether a guy was highly productive in college or can run a fast 40-yard dash.
By One.Cool.Customer
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015...ding-playmaking-defensive-ends-for-the-dallas
The blue-chip pass rushers will likely be gone by the time the Cowboys are on the clock with their first-round pick. But there are bound to be playmakers available to the Cowboys throughout the draft. Using a metric called the Production Ratio, we try to identify who those playmakers could be.
In 2014, the Cowboys recorded just 28 sacks, the fifth worst value for the team since 1978 when the league moved to a 16-game schedule. 28 sacks are the lowest sack total since a three-year stretch from 2000 - 2002, when the Cowboys recorded 25, 24, 24 sacks the three years en route to three consecutive 5-11 records.
It stands to reason that the Cowboys will want their sack total to increase in 2015, and one way of making that happen is to draft a player who can rush the passer. But finding effective pass rushers in the draft, either at DE or DT, is not an easy thing. If it was, everybody would be doing it.
Over the last few drafts, we've used a metric called the 'Production Ratio' to assess who the potential playmakers in the draft might be. The Production Ratio was initially proposed by NFL.com's Pat Kirwan, and is really a very simple metric that adds up sacks and tackles-for-loss and divides the sum by the number of college games played. The resulting ratio is one tool among many - albeit a pretty good one - that measures the playmaking potential of front five players coming out of college. The Production Ratio is calculated as follows:
PRODUCTION RATIO = (SACKS + TACKLES FOR LOSS) / NUMBER OF GAMES PLAYED
The resulting number basically tells you the frequency of splash plays (sacks or tackles-for-loss) a player recorded per game in the offensive backfield. The ratio is usually calculated over the entire college career of a prospect, but that method can be inaccurate because not every prospect has a four-year career in college. To correct for that, we'll look at two Production Ratios today, one for the entire college career (an indicator of consistency) and one for the last two seasons of a player's college career (an indicator for potential). For the two-year measure, a number above 1.5 is often indicative of premier talent for a pass rusher, a value above 2.0 is truly exceptional.
When we looked at the production ratio for previous draft classes, we saw that the Production Ratio for DEs/OLBs looked like a good indicator for the success of a college player at the NFL level. Of course, there are a multitude of other factors that determine how well a prospect will do both at the college and NFL level, but the correlation between college production and NFL production is strong enough to use it as one of the tools with which to evaluate college prospects.
By chance or by design, the defensive linemen the Cowboys have taken high in the last 10 drafts all have high production ratios in their final two years in college:
PlayerCollege StatsProduction Ratio
YearRound (Pick)PlayerSchoolSacksTFLGamesCollege CareerLast two seasons
20051 (11)DeMarcus WareTroy28.057.0441.932.15
20051 (20)Marcus SpearsLSU15.030.0261.731.73
20063 (92)Jason HatcherGrambling18.531.5281.792.35
20071 (26)Anthony SpencerPurdue21.044.0471.381.90
20123 (81)Tyrone CrawfordBoise State13.527.0261.561.56
20142 (34)DeMarcus LawrenceBoise State19.034.0232.302.30
Again, the mandatory caveat: There are a multitude of factors that determine how well a prospect will do in the NFL. College production is just one of them.
Some of the most successful pass rushers drafted of the last few years have remarkably high production ratios over their last two college years. Aldon Smith (1.96), J.J. Watt (1.85), Von Miller (2.52), Greg Hardy (1.74), Ndamukong Suh (2.07), and Aaron Donald (2.54) all showed outstanding production in college.
But not every successful NFL pass rusher necessarily had prolific college production. Detroit's Ezekiel Ansah has 15.5 sacks in two seasons, yet only had a two-year production ratio of 0.7 in college. In Ansah's case, his exceptional athleticism and physical potential warranted a high draft pick, but in general, teams would be well advised to fully understand the lack of elite-level production before making a selection based largely on physical measurements. Jason Pierre-Paul is often cited as an example of a player taken high based on measurables only, but only people unfamiliar with the Big East actually believe this. Pierre-Paul had a Production Ratio of 1.61 (15.5 TFLs, 5.5 sacks in 13 games) in his one year in South Florida, so while that may have been a low base from which to project his potential, the production was there.
Similarly, not every draft prospect with a high college production ratio will automatically turn into an All Pro pass rusher in the NFL. Last year, Jackson Jeffcoat had the highest production ratio with 2.47. Originally projected to be drafted somewhere in the middle rounds, he went undrafted and was signed by the Seahawks as an undrafted free agents. The Seahawks eventually released him after training camp, and he was signed to Washington's practice squad.
The Production Ratio, like every other stat-based projection tool, is not going to be a perfect predictor of how successful college players are going to be in the NFL. But it does give you something to think about as you evaluate these players and their potential, and it may be one building block in identifying who this year's playmakers will be - and who won't. In a little less than a month, the NFL Combine will provide us with even more metrics, giving us an even bigger data base from which to assess players.
2015 Edge Rusher Prospects
The table below shows the current top-ranked prospects that could potentially play defensive end in a 4-3 scheme. The table is sorted by their CBS Draft Ranking (Rank per January 21st), though you probably shouldn't attach too much weight to these early rankings. The table contains the top 32 defensive end prospects who were given a draftable grade by CBS. For your convenience, the table is sortable (just click on the blue column headers).
PlayerCollege StatsProduction Ratio
RankPlayerSchoolPOSHtWtSacksTFLGamesCollege Career Last two seasons
3Randy GregoryNebraskaDE6-624516.524.5241.711.71
8Shane RayMissouriDE6-324517.534401.291.75
9Dante FowlerFloridaOLB6-226114.534371.311.56
15Vic BeasleyClemsonOLB6-32353352.5481.782.67
17Alvin DupreeKentuckyDE6-426723.537471.291.59
35Arik ArmsteadOregonDE6-7296410.5390.370.46
37Eli HaroldVirginiaOLB6-423517.536.5361.501.88
39Owamagbe OdighizuwaUCLADE6-327012.524.5500.741.00
42Nate OrchardUtahDE6-42552538.5501.272.08
48Hau'oli KikahaWashingtonOLB6-32503651.5441.992.69
51Danielle HunterLSUDE6-62404.521380.670.98
65Mario Edwards Jr.Florida StateDE6-3294823350.891.08
70Markus GoldenMissouriOLB6-326016.533391.271.83
73Trey FlowersArkansasDE6-32701847.5491.341.67
92Za'Darius SmithKentuckyDE6-526410.513.5241.001.00
99Preston SmithMississippi StateDE6-52701627470.911.32
103Lorenzo MauldinLouisvilleOLB6-424321.534491.131.70
108Henry AndersonStanfordDE6-629515.530.5470.981.40
126Anthony ChickilloMiami (Fla.)DE6-428215.525500.810.71
146Cedric ReedTexasDE6-62711731441.091.58
163Corey CrawfordClemsonDE6-52705.524.5510.590.90
179Deion BarnesPenn StateDE6-42551326.5371.070.98
199Martin IfediMemphisDE6-32742235.5461.251.68
225Jermauria RascoLSUDE6-3247171842.50.820.85
226C.J. OlaniyanPenn StateOLB6-3252917.5410.650.98
241Brock HekkingNevadaDE6-32502234491.141.52
257Ray DrewGeorgiaDE6-42847.513460.450.63
263Marcus RushMichigan StateDE6-224318.537.5541.041.13
269Ryan RussellPurdueDE6-42739.524.5500.680.67
281Frank ClarkeMichiganDE6-227011.535.5480.981.54
316James RouseMarshallDE6-52708.525430.781.18
328Brian MihalikBoston CollegeDE6-92888.516430.570.69
There are some guys on here, like Clemson's Vic Beasley and others, whose playing weight may make them more suited to play pass rushing OLBs in a 3-4 scheme. I don't think that a 4-3 DE absolutely has to be a 280-pound guy, But I think 250 is probably the limit at which a 4-3 DE can be effective, and if you're looking for a prototype body, Alvin Dupree at 6-4, 267 is probably that guy - especially if you're looking for a left defensive end (to play opposite of DeMarcus Lawrence) where stopping the run is also a key consideration.
Vic Beasley, Hau'oli Kikaha, and Markus Golden are three of the obvious standouts on this list from a pure Production Ratio point of view, but all three probably project better as 3-4 OLBs than as 43 DEs.
Randy Gregory and Shane Ray are intriguing prospects for a 4-3 defense, but both will likely be long gone by the time the Cowboys are on the board with the 27th pick. But there'll be plenty of exciting prospects left for the Cowboys to choose from, including Nate Orchard and Alvin Dupree.
In 2012, Chandler Jones entered the league with a modest production ratio of 1.28, yet he leads all 2012 rookies with 23.5 total sacks over his three years in the NFL. Which just goes to show that pure athleticism can be just as important as college production.
I have not included some notable standouts like Lynden Trail (Norfolk State, 1.56 production ratio), Zach Wagenman (Montana, 2.41), Ryan Delaire (Towson, 2.02), or Shaquille Riddick (West Virginia, 1.81), because they spent most or all of their time at small schools where they did not face the same level of competition as the players listed in the table above. And while their numbers look very good, they probably won't translate easily to the NFL.
Remember when the Cowboys signed Prairie View standout Adrian Hamilton as an UDFA in 2012 on the strength of the 22 sacks he had notched in his senior season? The Cowboys ended up releasing him, as they saw that he wasn't particularly effective against the run and didn't have a lot of pass rush moves. The Ravens picked him up and he played ten snaps for them in 2012, spent 2013 on IR and was released in the summer of 2014. The Chargers picked him up for training camp and released him before the season started. Hamilton exemplifies the tough road to the NFL most small school prospects face.
Overall, the 2015 draft class does not look as chock full of pass rushers with great potential as some of the recent draft classes have. And sitting at No. 27, the Cowboys will not have the luxury of waiting until one of the consensus top talents falls into their laps, complete with a sterling production ratio, phenomenal athleticism and perfect measurables. That's simply not going to happen.
Instead, they'll have to figure out which of the many prospects available can be the most productive in the Cowboys' scheme, and that may be an entirely different question than whether a guy was highly productive in college or can run a fast 40-yard dash.
