TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,462
- Reaction score
- 69,897
You give Dallas far too much credit........McCarthy was vying for the most prestigious job in sports.
He would've said yes if Quincy Carter was quarterback.
You give Dallas far too much credit........McCarthy was vying for the most prestigious job in sports.
He would've said yes if Quincy Carter was quarterback.
Name me a new coach that ever walks into a perfect situation, other than Barry Switzter.
MM may love Dak, who knows.
MM may have serious doubts about Dak and wants a trial run on the tag, who knows?
No, I dont have any more questions commander,, but maybe MM saw an opportunity that made sense, and maybe that included Dak.I think McCarthy was pretty clear when he took the job:
“Defenses get you to the championship,” said one of nine active NFL coaches with Super Bowl rings. “Quarterbacks win championships."
“And I definitely feel Dak is that quarterback.”
Any more questions?
listened to the ocho podcast today guy on there said they next year the contract talks would start at 41 million a year average
No, I dont have any more questions commander,, but maybe MM saw an opportunity that made sense, and maybe that included Dak.
What doesnt make sense if that was the case, is why isnt Dak Signed?
Yes sir, no worries brother,, I dont get offended easily, but I digress,, I agree with you about MM needing to see more.From McCarthy's point of view, Dak is signed. He just isn't signed long term and from his comments he has always said he wants to be here.
Also sorry about the "any more questions" part of that post, that was part of McCarthy's quote and that was a direct copy and paste from the article. I wasn't trying to sound like a complete sausage, I should have caught that. .
This really isn't a Dak thread. It's more about the Cowboys finally getting set up right.
It wasn't fair to McCarthy to be saddled with a quarterback longterm that would be impossible to put on the bench if he wasn't cutting it.
No, I dont have any more questions commander,, but maybe MM saw an opportunity that made sense, and maybe that included Dak.
What doesnt make sense if that was the case, is why isnt Dak Signed?
It wasn't accidental.Either way i actually agree with a accidental point LeeBlair has, if your the GM of this specific franchise and the Fans are pissed from the lack of accountability against the coaching staff its not a bad idea to see this tag played out with your new coach so there are no excuses... I think Dak will be great under Mike but either way I want the pressure on Mike to bring this thing home and don't want to hear "well i really didn't like all the players i had long contracts with i need another 4 years to build my process".
It wasn't accidental.
No new head coach wants to be saddled with someone he has to play because of a contract, especially at quarterback.
This way it's a fresh start. McCarthy has a quarterback who has some experience, but who hasn't shown that he is able to get them to the next level.
Most of the other players could be dealt or cut if they don't fit in, but a quarterback eats too much of the salary cap.
It was the only right way to move forward.
That's no accident.The accident is you want the pressure on Dak, The pressure has been on Dak this whole time, I want the pressure on the coach....I know its been like forever for this franchise but would be nice to see the coach actually contribute.
He has always been talked about as highly coachable and receptive to whatever is asked of him, so I don’t see this as valid.With a one year deal, Dak cannot become set in his ways. He will be more receptive to Mike McCarthy's instructions, and will once again be in training- albeit, being paid very well to do so, under the tag.
His contract demands showed he believed that he had reached a pinnacle, and was at the top of the league as far as talent. But he wasn't.
Though he racked up huge numbers in the passing game, he was not able to give the Cowboys a boost against teams that they needed to beat to transcend to the next level.
Under Garrett, Dak was in danger of believing that what he had done was enough; he was coddled and never made to improve. His demands for a new contract show this clearly.
Now we actually have a new team. McCarthy isn't saddled with a guy he's never worked with that will eat up a huge chunk of the salary cap, and can run the team as he sees fit.
If Dak is the man, this year will bear that out. If not, we'll see what's next.
He has always been talked about as highly coachable and receptive to whatever is asked of him, so I don’t see this as valid.
As for contract demands, by most reports the problem was in the length of the contract, not the annual pay, which suggests the opposite of complacency. It suggests that Dak feels he can continue to up his game, which in turn would help his next contract negotiation. Everything both last year and this suggest he is betting on himself to show his worth rather than resting on what he’s done so far.
likewise. he just wanted the big money, probably helped along in that quest by his agent. there will be another opportunity next year to once gain go through the negotiating process. hopefully, with a different outcome.I’d say Dak’s desire for a shorter contract shows he wanted to keep working hard so he could sign another huge contract sooner. I never got the impression Dak was difficult to coach.
Dak was not "the problem", but he was "a problem".Exactly, he has shown growth every year. I'm still at a loss at the fans who actually watched the games last year and decided he is the problem....there is nothing that points to that. Am i ready to "anoint him" no.... but i'm also not ready to cut the other 52 players who played for Garrett and looked like a lost team midway through the season. Again lets put pressure on the coach for once to get the players to do basic shittt like not jumping off sides 3 times a game. If Dak plays bad then lets by all means go get a QB.
Dak was not "the problem", but he was "a problem".
And part of that was the way Garrett had coddled him and annointed him as the next great quarterback without making him earn it.
Kellen Moore should have been the starter in 2017, but Dak was given the position.
Because of this, Dak never seemed to be able to handle pressure situations. It always seemed as if he never felt responsible for the Cowboys struggles.
Garrett made him feel entitled- but ignored his weaknesses.
As of right now, Kellen Moore is still the best quarterback on the Dallas Cowboys.
dak got what he rightfully earned. moore got what he rightfully earned which was a promotion to oc and running the leagues top offense last year.Dak was not "the problem", but he was "a problem".
And part of that was the way Garrett had coddled him and annointed him as the next great quarterback without making him earn it.
Kellen Moore should have been the starter in 2017, but Dak was given the position.
Because of this, Dak never seemed to be able to handle pressure situations. It always seemed as if he never felt responsible for the Cowboys struggles.
Garrett made him feel entitled- but ignored his weaknesses.
As of right now, Kellen Moore is still the best quarterback on the Dallas Cowboys.