LittleBoyBlue
Redvolution
- Messages
- 35,766
- Reaction score
- 8,411
can we make this a pole?
Better chance to win SB - Dallas w/ TO or Philly w/out?
- Thread starter LittleBoyBlue
- Start date
Blue&Silver
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,898
- Reaction score
- 1,120
Any team with TO on it will never win a Superbowl. Unfortunately for us.
Eagles won't either. That's the good news :laugh2:
Eagles won't either. That's the good news :laugh2:
LittleBoyBlue
Redvolution
- Messages
- 35,766
- Reaction score
- 8,411
Blue&Silver;1071105 said:
Wow... thats funny he did his part in the only one he went to.... on a team that got him for that very reason... to win it.... (I know he didnt take them through the playoffs but played well enough to win in SB... although I dont know how he could do enough to make up for THREE INT's by the leader of the team
so maybe you are right? Blue&Silver
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,898
- Reaction score
- 1,120
YoMick;1071123 said:Wow... thats funny he did his part in the only one he went to.... on a team that got him for that very reason... to win it.... (I know he didnt take them through the playoffs but played well enough to win in SB... although I dont know how he could do enough to make up for THREE INT's by the leader of the team
Ok, good point.
Now point me to all the Superbowl trophies TO has hanging on his mantle.
He played 13 games with Philly, that team was going with or without him.
Chuck 54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,515
- Reaction score
- 12,532
Eagles had their chance to win it with T.O.
Maybe we'll get our chance.
The whole idea of Philly being a better team without T.O. on the field is ridiculous...when he was playing for them, on the field, making it happen, they were better off with him....after last year and the idiot he became, they are now better off without him.
We're better off with him on the field, but that doesn't mean I have to like him just because I love the Cowboys and am happy to use him to win.
Maybe we'll get our chance.
The whole idea of Philly being a better team without T.O. on the field is ridiculous...when he was playing for them, on the field, making it happen, they were better off with him....after last year and the idiot he became, they are now better off without him.
We're better off with him on the field, but that doesn't mean I have to like him just because I love the Cowboys and am happy to use him to win.
LittleBoyBlue
Redvolution
- Messages
- 35,766
- Reaction score
- 8,411
Blue&Silver;1071131 said:
He should have the one from Philly. All McNabb had to do was turn one of those INT's into 7.
Screw The Hall
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,083
- Reaction score
- 2,115
I think Dallas has the better chance because I think the Cowboys have the better team. TO plays a part in that but I don't think he's the inherent reason for me feeling that way.
dallasfan31
New Member
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction score
- 0
dallas very easily.
CanadianCowboysFan
Lightning Rod
- Messages
- 25,373
- Reaction score
- 8,148
Us easily. For all of Owens' antics, his teams are 20-5 in the last 25 games in which he has played.
SuspectCorner
Still waiting...
- Messages
- 10,242
- Reaction score
- 2,861
i'm with jerry. if they don't want owens... dang... we'll take him off their hands.
reload him and point him right back at the eagles.
i 'spect ya'll might have a newfound appreciation for the guy come monday.
reload him and point him right back at the eagles.
i 'spect ya'll might have a newfound appreciation for the guy come monday.
cowboyuptx
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,016
- Reaction score
- 617
Dallas.
Mostly because of our defense.
Youth. Depth. Coach.
TO, has never played opposite a player as explosive as Terry Glenn.
This will benefit all parties greatly.
Look at that, my 83rd post was giving props to Terry Glenn.. Cool.
Mostly because of our defense.
Youth. Depth. Coach.
TO, has never played opposite a player as explosive as Terry Glenn.
This will benefit all parties greatly.
Look at that, my 83rd post was giving props to Terry Glenn.. Cool.
CrazyCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,287
- Reaction score
- 440
of course dallas with T.O!
GlitzCowboy
New Member
- Messages
- 480
- Reaction score
- 0
God, it was like early 80's the last time the Eagles truly did anything without TO. 5 championship games in a row, oooo, who are they the early 90's Packers? Until they got TO they couldn't even bridge the gap from the 90's Packers to the 90's Bills. Then they get him and they're in the Super Bowl, and don't tell me the "strut" he brought to that team wasn't the main ingrediant that season - on or off the field, that season, he was everything. Fast forward to 2006, we probably aren't even in the Jacksonville game, Washington without the distraction of covering TO is probabbly a helluva lot more in the game if not winning it again in the end, and then who really knows about the Titan game, but I do know those 2 shell-shocking quick TD grabs from Terry probably don't happen if the concentration isn't all on TO - and then who knows how that could have calmed Young more and put him right into the game if they weren't starring at our 2 td's going into halftime. If Philthy could handle the atttention and pressure of a star player like that, they're the new Patriots, but they couldn't and now the most impactful player in the game today is on our team, a team that can handle most anything thrown it's way (history proven), and we are the better team for having him. The Iggles are the same team again that they were before getting TO, nothing special, a lot of hype, the NFC's version of Indy.