The guy wins.big dog cowboy said:Concerning the "upset" Pittsburgh pulled on Indy, the best play big Ben made was his lucky tackle on the fumble by Bettis. Plummer did more to lose the game against Pittsburgh than big Ben did to win it. And who can forget that overwhelming performance in the super bowl when he put up a QB rating of 22. They were not the team to beat last year everything just fell right for them. I hate to say it was a fluke they won the super bowl, but........
burmafrd said:Doesn't matter - its what you do in the SB that matters. Stink it up there and the rest DOESN'T MATTER.
Yes he did. With a better QB getting knocked out very early, another QB having his worst game of the year, another offensive team (maybe the best in football) just flat out getting ran over by the Pitt D. He won alright. But......J-DOG said:The guy wins.
Hostile said:Isn't that the key though? Was Aikman ever as impressive as Favre or Marino or Young? Ben plays within his team's system and wins. That's the greatest compliment you can give a QB. IMO. It's too easy to focus on stats when winning is all that really matters.
I'll partially agree. Roth would not do as well this year, but going on his 3rd year in this offense I think he'd do better than Bledsoe can. He's efficient and that leads to success. He's a perfect Parcells QB. 2006 Roth will take a step forward.ghst187 said:Drew Bledsoe is a better QB for us than Roth would be IMO. Roth is a great QB for (SH)Pittsburgh. Roth couldn't win in Dallas because he HAS to have a good running game and a defense that can win the game.
Bledsoe has to have an OL that can keep him upright and the chance to throw the ball deep downfield. Of course he could use a running game also. But the point is that I don't think either QB would do all that well if you swapped them out, they work well on their current teams.
burmafrd said:Doesn't matter - its what you do in the SB that matters. Stink it up there and the rest DOESN'T MATTER.
Hostile said:Interesting observation about Ferentz and Iowa O-linemen.
Alexander said:Sometimes the things I read that people actually believe amazes me.
tyke1doe said:Agreed.
If Big Ben were on the Cowboys making the same plays, posters would be irate if someone called him overrated.
The guy is in his SECOND year!!!
He has a 23-4 record in games he's started!
And saying Ben Roethlisberger is a bus driver is asinine. In the Bengals, Colts and Broncos game, the Steelers began by throwing the ball then settled into the running game, allowing their defense to tee off on the opposing team because they were in catch-up, panic mode.
Some of you guys are amazing. The man manages the game plan and unless he's tossing bombs like Marino and Fouts, he's overrated because he doesn't do enough at the quarterback spot.
And then you'll get mad if someone says that Aikman was OVERRATED because he handed off to Emmitt all the time and doesn't have impressive numbers.
Sheesh!
Not trying to sound flip about this, but fantasy football has ruined the true appreciation of the game in some ways. Stats serve a purpose, but when you simply can't look past them at anything else involved in the game it is a trap.Alexander said:I was amazed at how ordinary Roethlisberger looked in the Super Bowl, but you cannot argue he had an outstanding postseason up until that point. He was the primary reason they made it because he was so effective. Of course, that might not be enough for the statistical junkies, but we all know how important those are in the general scheme of things.
And to call all of that worthless because he had a tough game in the SB? I don't know how to begin how foolish that statement is.
Hostile said:Not trying to sound flip about this, but fantasy football has ruined the true appreciation of the game in some ways. Stats serve a purpose, but when you simply can't look past them at anything else involved in the game it is a trap.