Big Blunder letting Switzer go

[ItzKelz]

I think the FO knew all along they wouldn't be re-signing Beasley, so we basically gave away Switzer, who is scheduled to make 645k this year and 735k for the Steelers.

Switzer is just a dude. Plenty of those in the draft and plenty better.

 

[jjktkk]

I think the FO knew all along they wouldn't be re-signing Beasley, so we basically gave away Switzer, who is scheduled to make 645k this year and 735k for the Steelers.

And on his 3rd team.

 

[buybuydandavis]

so we basically gave away Switzer, who is scheduled to make 645k this year and 735k for the Steelers.

We tried to get a DT and failed. One Marinelli had worked with for a week. We needed one. It was a good bet.

Is there any evidence we should be crying about letting Switzer go?

His yards per *target* were 5.75 last year. Abysmal. His return yardage was *worse* at Pitt.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SwitRy00/gamelog/2018/

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

I think the FO knew all along they wouldn't be re-signing Beasley, so we basically gave away Switzer, who is scheduled to make 645k this year and 735k for the Steelers.

....and isn't any good

So it doesn't really matter his CAP hits

 

[Idgit]

If Switzer were to somehow tripple his production next year, we’ll, that’d really show us.

Wait, I meant ‘quadruple.’