Bill Arnsparger and the flex defense.

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
For those of you whose earliest experiences of Dallas Cowboys football are QBs like Tony Romo and DeMarcus Ware, you might not remember Bill Arnsparger. He was Don Shula's defensive coordinator for many years. He was the inventor of the "53" defense, one of the earliest 3-4 type defenses in the NFL. In 1972, 1973, and 1983 he had the #1 defense in the NFL under Shula. Later he goes to LSU as head coach and they win the SEC for the first time in many years. In the 1990s, he is a DC with the Charger and he leads them to a respectable defense.

In 1999 he wrote a book, called "Arnsparger's Coaching Defensive Football", which I recently reviewed here.

http://codeandfootball.wordpress.co...-coaching-defensive-football-another-classic/

He talks about a lot of things. In a section called history, he discusses the wide tackle six and then the seven-diamond that can stem from a wide tackle six.

7121_stemmed.jpg


Among the teams that would play this defense successfully were the teams at Tennessee from the 1940s to the 1960s. So why is it important? Tell you what, take the right tackle on that defense, stand him up in a two point stance and move him back 2-3 yards. What Buddy Ryan defense does it resemble?

The reason this kind of talk merits FAN page status is that Bill later discusses, in a fair amount of depth, the Tom Landry flex. He doesn't diagram it accurately. It's clearly a flex strong, and the weak side DE is in a 5, not a 4, the onside tackle isn't flexed. But for the purposes of his discussion that wasn't important.

img_6721.jpg


The player he talks about most, the single most important player in the Landry flex, to Bill, was the weakside defensive end.

He discusses the responsibilities of that end pretty exhaustively. Not the "book" responsibilities. He didn't have the Landry playbook that I know of. It's a product of pure film study.

So why that end? I will suggest that if you study the pursuit responsibilities of the OLBs in a Miami (JJ) 4-3, you'll see striking similarities between those responsibilities and what Landry's weakside end is doing. Further, he doesn't say so, but I suspect he picked up some tricks that his offside ILBs and OLBs in his 3-4 used. Why else bring up the topic at all?

It's a unique, fascinating look at the flex, and suggestive that flex pursuit principles influenced the way the Miami Dolphins' 3-4 played.
 

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
I miss the "Flex"... sigh.

I think what we miss is the compulsive creativity of Tom. Before the flex it was the 4-3 inside/outside, and that defensive system doesn't get enough respect.

It was seen in *most* NFL Championships-Super Bowls from 1956 to 1967, a period of dominance that puts the WCO to shame, but almost no one talks about that.

It's easier to talk about the years it *wasn't* seen, and those were 1957, 1963 (maybe) and 1964.

He builds a multiple offense with line shifts to disguise his backfield movement, he resurrects the direct snap offense on 3rd down, he tinkers constantly..

Randy White? Wouldn't he make a great middle linebacker? So he tried it for a while..

And when Arnsparger called Bud Wilkinson "Bud Wilkerson" in his book, my reply was "Gary Hogenbloom"..

D-
 

LOBO7

Well-Known Member
Messages
603
Reaction score
502
Looking at the 1st pic. If you ran that D today against Dez and the other great receivers of this generation, looks like a lot of one on one out on the edges. Your pass rush would have to be dominating to get away with that.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
The problem with the Flex was that it required very intelligent players that were highly disciplined. A lot of what it demanded went against the natural instincts of defensive players. That meant you needed a certain kind of player that are hard to get anymore.
 

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
The problem with the Flex was that it required very intelligent players that were highly disciplined. A lot of what it demanded went against the natural instincts of defensive players. That meant you needed a certain kind of player that are hard to get anymore.

They were hard to get back then, too. It took a few years for Landry's defense to gel, and he got rid of a lot of folks his first 3-4 years.

D-
 
Top