Bob Sturm Blog: Football 301: Decoding Garrett – Week 2

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,649
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Posted on September 22nd, 2009 8:46am by Bob Sturm
Filed under Dallas Cowboys, Garrett, Sturm

DISCLAIMER: This is not for everyone. It may not be for you. This is a statistical study of the Cowboys offense with lots of numbers that may make your head tired if you are not up to it. Read it only if it is something that is of interest to you.

Well, I know the hurt is still there for many fans of the Cowboys, but just know as you read this that the Cowboys coaching staff has already digested the Giants film and today will put the finishing touches on the Panthers’ game plan.

The Giants game will be remembered by many of us as a failure, but success versus failure in the National Football League sometimes comes down to a simple field goal attempt with no time left on the clock after 3 hours of two teams killing each-other. The basic truth is this: In every game, there is good to consider and bad to avoid. And Sunday night, the Cowboys did some wonderful things. But, it only takes one untimely lapse in judgement from either your QB or your Offensive Coordinator to get you beat. That is the point of this Tuesday Series here at Inside Corner. To examine where they got it right, and where they got it wrong during each Cowboys game.


You likely do not require this breakdown to realize a few things: 1) The passing game, regardless of personnel package, has not looked that bad since Brad Johnson was working his magic. and 2) When running the ball, it worked in pretty much every look. But “22″, was very impressive. 58 snaps, and 28 snaps (48%) included at least 2 Tight Ends – so it wasn’t straight “12″, but they continue to use Witten and Bennett as big parts of what they do.

Let’s visit about “22″ this week. This week, the Cowboys used it more than any other package in their base offense (S11 is the standard 2-minute offense and therefore will generally always have the highest numbers).

“22″ means that the Cowboys deploy 2 Running Backs (Barber or Jones, and the FB Deon Anderson) and both tight ends (80 and 82). This obviously is a power running set that allows you to do a number of things andmakes the opponent second guess what it puts out there. If they leave their standard defense out there, there is a chance that you can get a hat on a hat in the running game and roll through some big plays. 10 Run plays out of the “22″ and the Cowboys rolled up 121 yards. Barber broke a 25 yarder, andFelix Jones busted a 56 yard run, both out of this set.

Totals by Personnel Groups:

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-personnel2.gif

Table Tutorial

Definition of the Personnel Groups, click here .

“Other” this week represented 4 snaps. Early in the game, Garrett rolled out “31″ on a 2nd down and 1 yard to go with Choice, Jones, and Barber all on the field at the same time. “S01″ was run twice – this is a shotgun set with 0 RBs and 1 TE (so all 4 active WRs were on the field) – that yielded 2 plays for 20 yards which was the 20 yard catch to Austin down the middle. The final new personnel look Garrett used on Sunday night was 1 snap out of a “S21″ – Shotgun with Barber, Jones, Witten, and 2 WRs. This was on a key 3rd and 8 in the 4th Quarter where Romo hit Witten for 13 yards near midfield. Look for more out of this look at certain times down the road because it really stretches the defense to account for 28, 24, and82 underneath.

Big Plays:

1st Q – 3/10/D24 – In “S11″, Pass to Crayton, Interception by Johnson for Touchdown
3rd Q – 1/10/N47 – In “21″, Pass to Hurd, Interception by Phillips
3rd Q – 1/10/D16 – In “22″, Run to Jones, 56 yards
4th Q – 2/6/N41 – In “S11″, Run draw to Barber, 34 yards

Video Breakdowns:

Last week, we got some great feedback on our video breakdowns. Once again, I want to thank Brian at DC Fanatic.com and I greatly appreciate his technical abilities and willingness to spend his own time in putting this stuff on video for us to digest. Please go visit him when you can.

Also, another Cowboys fan, Shawn in Florida, deserves recognition for compiling some various numbers over the years (and emailing me with better Cowboys observations than most) and I want to thank him before we go on. Anyway, here we go – and this week, we need to look at some of the bad:

—————————————————–

The Play:1st Q – 3/10/D24 – In “S11″, Pass to Crayton, Interception by Johnson for Touchdown
[youtube]tJnbWAY8JpI[/youtube]


What Happened:S11 on 3rd and Long. Witten and Austin to Romo’s left; Williams and Crayton on Romo’s Right with Crayton in the slot. Chances are, the Cowboys had one thing called in the huddle, and then when the Giants have 7 guys on the line in pre-snap, Romo audibles to something a bit more safe. Then, the Giants appear to counter his audible with one of their own, as Antonio Pierce calls of the blitz (which obviously is Man coverage) andswitches the Giants to a zone underneath look. Check Mate. Romo did not have time to change the play a 3rd time, so he runs what they called. At this time, he must concede the play and throw it out of bounds and take a punt. He does not. He tries to make a perfect throw, and unless it is 100% perfect, it is getting picked. Punts are good. Picks are bad. Especially bad if it is returned for a Touchdown because you did this at your own 24 yard line. Very, very poor.

Some have asked me if he should have taken Roy on the slant underneath, but I think Pierce blows that up, too. I think the safe play is the punt at this spot on the field.

————————————————————

The Play:3rd Q – 1/10/N47 – In “21″, Pass to Hurd, Interception by Phillips
[youtube]VHbLqbRfaB4[/youtube]


What Happened: Remember last week, the Cowboys ran “21″ personnel 11 times and ran out of it 10 times. I was sure that Garrett had a play-action ambush planned out of this look, and here it was. But, it backfired badly. The Cowboys lead here 24-20 late in the 3rd Quarter. The biggest issue here is it is 1st and 10 and the Cowboys were running the football with ease. Ending this drive in the end-zone may put the game away, so you understand the desire to go for the “Kill shot”.

The premise of the play is very simple. Play fake to Barber and go over the top to Hurd. If the Giants are playing like a team that has been getting gashed on the ground (The Cowboys had just run for 84 yards in the last drive!), then they are expected to crash the line of scrimmage with the safeties and linebackers. Why was Kenny Phillips playing the deepest pre-snap safety anyone has ever seen? Why was he expecting this play on 1st and 10 when the Cowboys hadn’t take a deep shot all night? Was it too obvious that the call was coming? Did they steal a sign? I have no idea.

But, Tony has to see his key. On a deep pass like this, the key is the deep safety. Brian added some audio here that is very telling and also, the Ed Reed interception from last winter. Good football X’s and O’s. And a big tip of the hat to Bill Sheridan, the Giants new Defensive Coordinator. Sometimes, a great idea doesn’t work. Here it was.

—————————————————————–

The Play: 1st Q – 1/10/N40 – “22″ personnel – Barber run for 25 yards

[youtube]wIrZN1nRmRA[/youtube]

What Happened: This video is joined by animation by Brian! Sunday night, as the Cowboys were on their 2nd drive, it became clear that they were running the same play on the Barber 25 yard run and then 2 plays later on the touchdown run. Check it out. “22″ – with Bennett and Witten on the right showing a pass look. Then, in pre snap, Bennett crosses Witten back towards Colombo. It looks like the play is designed to either go Gurode and Davis in the “A” gap, or between Davis and Colombo in the “B” gap, with Barber having the liberty to cut back if the Giants over-pursue.

The first play, he does sense the Giants LBs over ran the play (Watch #52 Boley, the WLB go too far to his left, and #65 Gurode bulldoze him further out of position), so he headed back to Kosier/Adams. Kosier gets a good seal, and Barber is off. On the Touchdown, Barber just follows Big Len. Same play, run twice in 3 snaps, and run very well.

——————————————

The Play: 2/10/D16 – “22″ personnel, Felix runs for 56 yards

[youtube]JqyilPjIICQ[/youtube]

What Happened:Another “22″ look, with Bennett off Right Tackle, and Witten in motion across to the left. Watch Witten’s motion taking one safety out of the run defense, and now, the LBs sense that the play is going to the Cowboys strong side (right). Once again, #52 Boley gets caught up in the wash, and when Felix cuts back, Deon Anderson doesn’t even have anyone to block. Then, Felix can easily get up on the Safety Phillips who takes a bad angle and is lost in space against someone of Jones’ speed. 2 snaps later, they ran this same play with Jones, and it burst for another 15 yards.

The “22″ is interesting, because it seems like you always have plenty of blockers, and the RBs can run to daylight. I would expect that this is another way to utilize 2 TEs down the road.

Target Distribution:

This will demonstrate why pregame talk and pregame articles are just guesses. I looked closely at this matchup, and it seemed obvious that they Cowboys should have great success going to wide outs because the Giants have horrid healthy in their secondary. Without Aaron Ross and Kevin Dockery, and withboth safeties being gimpy, it would seem that Williams, Crayton, and friends should be able to make some big plays, right?

Wow. 5-18 to Crayton, Williams, Hurd, Austin, and Bennett. Basically, anyone downfield not named Witten had almost no success on Sunday night. And, against a depleted Giants secondary on a night where the Giants were unable to get to Romo with pass rush? Amazing. Reminds you of the Seattle playoff game when the Seahawks pulled Pete Hunter out of a Dallas mortgage office and the Cowboys could not take advantage of that, either. And, let’s not forget that Romo to Witten caused the “Heel INT” on Sunday night, so that wasn’t perfect either.

Targets – Week 2 vs NYG

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-targets2.gif
Table Tutorial

Season Target Distribution To Date:

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-targets2a.gif
Table Tutorial

3rd Down Target Distribution:

3rd down targets are key to see what Romo does on a “make-or-break” down. Who does he trust? Who gets open when they need it? 15 3rd down throws for Romo this season – with success (either a first down or a touchdown) on just 5 of them. Of those 5, 4 go to Jason Witten. The fifth success was a dump off to Tashard Choice for 3 yards. And on Sunday, Roy Williams did not even get a ball thrown his way on 3rd down. Hmmm.

3RD Down Targets – Week 2 – NYG

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-3rdtarget2.gif
Table Tutorial

3rd Down Targets – Season Totals

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-3rdtarget2a.gif
Table Tutorial

SACKS

Here, we keep track of sacks all season. So far, pass protection has not been an issue at all. But, trust me, this is a long season. we will need this chart, too.

Anyway, we will continue to update this chart as the season goes on:

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/Cowboys/table-sack2.gif

http://insidecorner.dmagazine.com/2009/09/22/football-301-decoding-garrett-week-2/#more-16669
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Great stuff.

Garrett made a good call, but the DC for the Giants made a great call and good guess that Dallas may try a kill shot. It happens. Romo has to make the read and make an adjustment. A sack in that situation is a better option than an interception thrown into coverage and there were several other better options than making that throw.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
joseephuss;2961915 said:
Great stuff.

Garrett made a good call, but the DC for the Giants made a great call and good guess that Dallas may try a kill shot. It happens. Romo has to make the read and make an adjustment. A sack in that situation is a better option than an interception thrown into coverage and there were several other better options than making that throw.

Romo had all day to throw

I like to call Romo the drunken quarterback, because he sometimes just tends to black out and throws it up for grabs
 

kramskoi

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,387
Reaction score
1,765
joseephuss;2961915 said:
Great stuff.

Garrett made a good call, but the DC for the Giants made a great call and good guess that Dallas may try a kill shot. It happens. Romo has to make the read and make an adjustment. A sack in that situation is a better option than an interception thrown into coverage and there were several other better options than making that throw.

...and maybe this speaks to the Giant defense knowing the tendencies of Romo and his lack of patience at times...they were determined to defend the run with the front seven and keep the field in front of Romo with a depleted secondary...Romo must recognize, accept and take what the defense gives, along with Garrett...in this case running lanes for Barber, Jones, and Choice...simple as that...
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
joseephuss;2961915 said:
A sack in that situation is a better option than an interception thrown into coverage and there were several other better options than making that throw.

Romo's already said he just didn't see the guy, that he thought Hurd was running free. It wasn't a bad decision or gamble throwing into coverage in that light,just a mental mistake missing the safety on his initial read.

As you said, it happens and a great call by the Giants DC.
 

kmd24

Active Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
0
wileedog;2962086 said:
Romo's already said he just didn't see the guy, that he thought Hurd was running free. It wasn't a bad decision or gamble throwing into coverage in that light,just a mental mistake missing the safety on his initial read.

As you said, it happens and a great call by the Giants DC.

It's not that he just didn't see him, they swapped responsibilities for Michael Johnson and Kenny Phillips. Sounds like Romo might have located Michael Johnson, but didn't consider that Phillips was the one with deep middle responsibility.

<edit> Now that I look at it, Johnson was over Crayton in the slot, so there's really no excuse. That wasn't really an exotic look.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
Count me amongst those who isn't gonna gripe about Garrett's play call on the deep pick by Romo.

I don't want robotic playcalling. That doesn't mean you don't play the hot hand predominantly, just not exclusively. At a certain level you want to keep them guessing. That too is why teams continue to run the ball even when its ineffective. You can't become predictable.

But just because Garrett called it doesn't mean Romo has to throw it. Good decision-making is always required. If Romo just flat out didn't see the safety - so be it. Just get those eyes open going forward.

Frankly, I don't nit-pick the playcalling nearly as much as many on this site. Everyone thinks they are a playcalling genius.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
CoCo;2962170 said:
Count me amongst those who isn't gonna gripe about Garrett's play call on the deep pick by Romo..
I have zero problem with it either - in fact I like the call.

24-20 is hardly kill the clock time, and I think you need to keep the defense scared of the pass to keep the run working as it was. Moreover, if Tony hits the kill shot it makes the Giant offense 1 dimensional the rest of the game.

Didn't work, but not a great reason to blame the play call.
 

diehard2294

America's Team
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
593
great job, I thought at the very least when Pierce checked out of the blitz, Romo could have called a timeout
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
wileedog;2962187 said:
I have zero problem with it either - in fact I like the call.

24-20 is hardly kill the clock time, and I think you need to keep the defense scared of the pass to keep the run working as it was. Moreover, if Tony hits the kill shot it makes the Giant offense 1 dimensional the rest of the game.

Didn't work, but not a great reason to blame the play call.

Same here. Said as much yesterday. There was nothing wrong with the play selection the execution on the other hand hurt us. I expect to use some play action looking for the big play when the running game is working like it was vs the giants. Romo made a mistake the call was right at least in my view.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
I would like to see Sturm do a video analysis of the defense too.
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
That was really good.

That deep pick to Hurd was the game, imo. 24-20

It was a killer.

Just run the ball. The game was ready to be put away. There was absolutely no need to go for it all. The Giants were on the ropes and ready to be knocked out on the ground. Running the ball would have kept any third down a shorter throw for Romo.

Barber and Felix Jones were gashing them.
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
Jason Garrett needs to make up his mind and decide who he is and be that guy.

He is negating his rushing game when he puts Romo in bad situations. The Giants are not Tampa Bay. The Commanders and Eagles have good secondaries.

If your going to run for over 250+ yards and you are destroying the other team, why is Romo throwing the ball 31 times? It isn't necessary. Plus, it wasn't working.

Felix Jones got 7 bloody carries.

Look no further to why you lost.

Romo could have thrown the ball 18-19 times, and Dallas would have won.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
41gy#;2962911 said:
That was really good.

That deep pick to Hurd was the game, imo. 24-20

It was a killer.

Just run the ball. The game was ready to be put away. There was absolutely no need to go for it all. The Giants were on the ropes and ready to be knocked out on the ground. Running the ball would have kept any third down a shorter throw for Romo.

Barber and Felix Jones were gashing them.

I agree it was a bad play.

In my opinion, however, the game was the Flozell tripping call. That was the back-breaking drive we needed to score on.

And I don't care if Felix gets only 7 carries, so longer as he carries that ball 7 times for 96 yards every week, maybe more. Throw in a TD or two and I'm all for it.
 

Venger

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
788
Just run the ball. Again with this inanity. They DID run the ball, you CANNOT run EVERY down. Get this already.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
BAT;2962826 said:
I would like to see Sturm do a video analysis of the defense too.

Here it is...

swisscheese.jpg
 

poost

Well-Known Member
Messages
799
Reaction score
402
I wonder why Felix didn't score on that run. He was already behind everyone. Was it just a perfect angle by the safety?
 
Top