too many drivel's from you to respond to idiotic senseless repeatedly proven wrong childish rhetoric you throw around. you show you know less about footbball with every post. so I enjoy putting the fool on full display.
first you said most...then there are some who don't coach college ranks. right?
second did bilicheck coach college ranks? or any head coaching experience prior to the browns? there are actually quite a few who didn't.
so coaching in college is not a precursor to coaching in the pros.
no one is comparing garrett to today's bilicheck. but way back then, when you were still in diapers, bilicheck was a failure as a head coach and well wasn't a head coach for a while. he actually had less success than garrett. the comparison was bilicheck's start as a head coach vs. garrett.
but you seem to want to only rely on your hind sight is 20/20 and predict the past.
pete carroll failed as a head coach in the NFL before he went to college to find success. in fact he was fired!!!!
simple really if you did some research.
son, the only thing you have ever gone back to consistently in your foolish half arsed posts is garrett doesn't run the ball. that's all you have said and nothing but. btw, it was in plain sight for you to see. given you as a fool brought it up any way. you, yes you and I can point you to your own posts since you tend to forget what you post as you spin a lot, that because we ran the ball we had great TOP, thus better defense as a result compared to last year. if you had a longer attention span you would would have seen that three years ago we had similar TOP and we weren't running the ball. wait. I actually pointed that out to you which you just plain ignored...again usual act on your part as it didn't fit your flawed argument.
son. go back to your books (it will do you good). don't try to learn this complicated stuff as its above your level of understanding. just watch the game. cheer when you see the crowd cheering. watch the beer commercials and enjoy yourself.
LOL...........you're the clown that keeps comparing Garrett to Carroll and Bellicheck.
Here is a piece of free advice for you.........dont do it, you sound foolish.
And if you saying that their records being similar to start their careers isnt saying that Garrett will turn out to be Bellicheck then you just proved my point.
Its a useless coincidence, nothing more.
Without a doubt one of the lamest angles or arguments anyone has EVER put forth when promoting a coach.
And if you had ANY brains then you would know that TOP isnt the ONLY thing that a running game does for a team or the offense.
Like most angry little garrett homers like you, you cant win the argument so you focus on one little side point because its all you got.
The Cowboys went 12-4 last year after going 8-8 3 years in a row. And the big differences in the team were:
-The run game going from bad to great
-Linehan running the offense and Garrett not
-The defense improvement and especially the turnovers they created.
Yet you are going to sit here and act like the Run game did nothing. LOL!!!!!
In attempt to defend Garrett, you are showing you simply don't understand football.
So tell me genius...................was Emmitt Smith and run game important to the Cowboys winning 3 SB's in the 90's?
Oh wait, this isnt the 90's, its a passing league right? LOL ummm..............SEAHAWKS?
