Bob Sturm's Answers to Questions 1-14

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,563
We will have the rest of his answers soon.

1. Do you think that Jerry has finally figured out that taking an offensive lineman in the first round isn't a bad thing? History tells us that over the last 10 years he has only been interested in drafting the skill positions, OLBs, and CBs in the frist round. Nothing else. (well, he did draft Marcus Spears in the first round, but that was AFTER Ware and he had to trump Parcells to do that) --nyc

I would like think that Jerry is very interested in taking a 1st Round OL this season. There are a number of reasons why, but when you simply look at the team based on a percentage of playing time for each player, OL players are among the single most valuable commodity because they can and do play 100% of your offensive snaps. By comparison, your starting RB plays just over 50% of the snaps. To ignore this spot on the roster is absolutely silly and the Cowboys have to be aware of it. Now, I will concede that the jury is out on pretty much all of the 1st Round candidates at OL - especially at #9. Solder, for instance, is a guy I would not touch based on my personal feelings about his tape and his game performance. So, just taking one isn't the concern. It is taking the proper one. Same with DL - the issue isn't with the idea of taking DL help - the issue is that you had mis-evalutated Marcus Spears.

2. Should the NFL be run like the English Premier League? --dogberry

How is that? If you mean relelgation exists - then, I would love it. But, obviously, the structure of the league would not support that. No cap? I would be against that. I love both leagues and consider them the absolute goals for any sporting league, but I do not understand that question.

3. Who do you see the Cowboys taking at 9? --jterrell

I feel like DL is where the draft is taking them. I think you simply have to look at your needs and cross reference it with what is available. I feel (and everyone else does, too) that DE has been a real achilles heel here lately and it would seem that to play the percentages you would likely have your pick of the litter at 3-4 DE. If you can get a real disruptive player here, your entire defense changes. Dareus, Jordan, Watt are the 3 I have my eyes on, and I think you will have at least 2 of those sitting there when you are up. I do not think Prince Amukamara is special enough to take at #9 - and I also disagree that you take him only to convert him to safety. Too much money up there to consider it an experiment. He has been a press corner in college which is a positive, but in watching him closely on the field, I think his combine numbers are far more impressive than his game tape.

4. How many owners would have kept Jerry on as their GM for the last 15 years? --Duane

1. Jerry Jones.

5. Do you think the Cowboys have a label of being SOFT around the league? --dboy214

I think the Cowboys have a label of being unable to overcome adversity. I think sometimes people look at the Cowboys and say "as long as they are rolling, they can be very, very good. But the second things begin to unravel, they have a tendency to give in." I think that label comes from Wade Phillips. I expect that Garrett will erase much of that image.

6. Hi Bob, always like your breakdown coverages on Cowboys. What players have you heard in the upcoming draft that the cowboys coaching staff and scouts are interested in?
I have heard so far cowboys are looking at these players 1. Patrick Peterson CB/S, 2. Brandon Harris CB, 3. Cameron Jordan DE, 4. J J Wyatt DE, 5. Andy Dalton QB, 6. Colin Kaepernick QB, 7. Kendric Burney CB. So, if any other players that you know of cowboys have shown interest in for the upcoming draft would be greatly appreciated. --cowboyjoe

I try to let my contacts with the Cowboys complete their Pro Days before I get too close to the draft board, but I do believe they are looking hard at Jordan and Watt. I also know they want CB as the draft develops. And I believe they are interested in some OL help if it falls right. I know Peterson is very interesting to them, but the odds of him getting to #9 are extremely remote.

7. Why do you focus on football and not bull * like some of the other DFW yentas? --The Emperor

LOL. I have a rather sick obsession with football. Year round. I just don't care as much about spring training.

8. If you had the power to sign any free agent for the Cowboys during the offseason, who would it be and why? Also, thanks for all of the breakdowns you do, great insight for a fan like me who can always use a more detailed explanation backed up with statistics. --JustDezIt

I really thought the Atogwe opportunity was very good. I also think Michael Huff would be ideal and expensive. I don't understand why they let Atogwe go without even a visit. I broke him down with the Rams and he seemed to be just what the doctor ordered.

9. Do you think the Cowboys should go after Atogwe? He's a real playmaker at a position of absolute need for the Cowboys. --BIGDen

I absolutely did. I think the Commanders are quite possibly capable of the best safety tandem around when you can keep Laron Landry in the box as SS and Atogwe as FS. And then, when you least suspect it, you can switch them and cause all sorts of chaos.

10. Bob, You are by far my favorite of the people that cover the Cowboys. Thanks for your efforts. If John Phillips was not injured in the Preseason, would he have been on the field over Gronk during the play that knocked Romo out for the season? --Joe Rod

Thanks, Joe. That is tough to say, because while they did use Phillips occasionally in the backfield, it is tough to assume that they wouldn't have also had a FB on the squad for blitz pick up. I think Gronk had a very learning filled rookie season, but I also think he has potential and we should understand that everyone misses assignments. In fact, if you recall, Jason Witten missed Clay Matthews on that giant play at Lambeau that almost got Marion Barber killed. Missed blocks are everywhere in a game, and it is a game of chance when your missed block costs the QB the rest of his season. I look forward to both making next year's roster.

11. Despite the probowl voting my opinion is that Gurode is a good but not great center. Do you believe that the center position not only requires a physically imposing player but an exceptionally smart player who can help the quarterback assess the defense and quickly, effectively adjust the line. --cowboyed

Yes, I do think that center is a vital spot. I think we often judge centers based on the quality of the snaps. And Gurode obviously has issues there. At the same time, his recognition of blitzes when he calls out protections is decent from what I can gather and his actual physical pass and run blocking seems solid. In addition he played all 1105 snaps this season making him a constant on a team that needed that. I guess my evaluation is that I don't believe he is a Pro Bowl-caliber player, but he is solid enough that I would recommend keeping him there for 2011. You have bigger and more serious holes to address.


12. Over the years no player has been topic of more controversy than Tony Romo, in terms of his ability. You have people that love him, people that hate him, and everywhere in between. What do personnel people/coaches around the league (those that just don't regurgitate what ESPN/media says) think about him? --vlad

Well, it would be disingenuous to claim there is a consensus about his ability. I think most pro people consider him a very nice QB who at times can be better than very nice. He doesn't make many mistakes and still generates big plays down the field. He uses the entire field when he is at the wheel and can make all of the throws. There are still questions about his intangibles and his leadership when adversity hits. Also, he needs to lead this team deep into the playoffs very soon. He has always played under a ton of pressure and this year will be no different. I think he is respected around the league and his skills rate well. But, the jury awaits him putting everything together.

13. Any chance that AOA (Akwasi) might have progressed enough (injury recovery, ability) to contribute at S this coming season? --Phoenix

I fear that AOA is never going to be what the Cowboys thought he could be. They really liked him as a return man and a conversion project. The fact is that in a relatively large sample size, his return ability showed nothing beyond ordinary. McCann had far greater spark back there. And as a safety, he has not shown me anything to get excited about. Now, being hurt surely did not help his development either. I would sure hope he breaks out soon because I cannot bare another blown pick at that spot of the draft.

14. If you are a GM and you have to take three players from this team to go start another team, who would you take and why? Thank you for your time! --bsheern

I think this question means "who are the three most desired players on the roster?" - If I understood that right, I would take Doug Free, Dez Bryant, and DeMarcus Ware. Free looks like a Left Tackle who did not struggle at all last season and has plenty of years in front of him. His athleticism is remarkable and he hardly ever loses the edge. Dez Bryant is a superstar waiting to happen and Ware is a superstar that has happened. The rest of the Top 5 would be Miles Austin and I think Jay Ratliff. This is actually a tough list to put together after the Top 4. If I was another franchise, which guys would I want to pick off? I am not sure I would trust Mike Jenkins or Anthony Spencer right now. And the list of young studs is not nearly as long as it needs to be.
 
Sturm is usually spot on. Probably moreso than any sports writer I know of. Can't find anything in there I don't agree with. I think his assessment of Gurode is exactly right.
 
Sweet! Thanks Bob!

And as far as Garrett reversing the image of the Cowboys just giving in when the going gets tough, I think that has already started, based on the second half of last season.
 
thanks bob for answering my question, hope you have a nice day, joe
 
I sure hope he is wrong about AOA. I was hoping with a strong training camp (if there is one) that his development would be substantial.
 
Hostile;3868062 said:
14. If you are a GM and you have to take three players from this team to go start another team, who would you take and why? Thank you for your time! --bsheern

I think this question means "who are the three most desired players on the roster?" - If I understood that right, I would take Doug Free, Dez Bryant, and DeMarcus Ware. Free looks like a Left Tackle who did not struggle at all last season and has plenty of years in front of him. His athleticism is remarkable and he hardly ever loses the edge. Dez Bryant is a superstar waiting to happen and Ware is a superstar that has happened. The rest of the Top 5 would be Miles Austin and I think Jay Ratliff. This is actually a tough list to put together after the Top 4. If I was another franchise, which guys would I want to pick off? I am not sure I would trust Mike Jenkins or Anthony Spencer right now. And the list of young studs is not nearly as long as it needs to be.

Any GM that would take Austin or Ratliff over Romo and Witten would be lynched by his team's fans.....and rightly so.
 
I felt pretty honored that he answered my question until I saw that he answered NYC's as well. :p:
 
I agree with Sturm's views on Solder (in the top 20 picks, at least). I think that T Smith could be viewed as a top 10 pick - but I have to agree with him the odds are that the Cowboys take either C Jordan or Watt at 9 (unless Peterson drops).
 
Hostile;3868062 said:
7. Why do you focus on football and not bull * like some of the other DFW yentas? --The Emperor

LOL. I have a rather sick obsession with football. Year round. I just don't care as much about spring training.

Favorite question. I don't know if Sturm missed the real essence of the question or just chose the high road (duh) in answering. It'd be interesting to get his candid answer.
 
tomson75;3868266 said:
Any GM that would take Austin or Ratliff over Romo and Witten would be lynched by his team's fans.....and rightly so.


i kinda thought his choices were odd as well
 
tomson75;3868266 said:
Any GM that would take Austin or Ratliff over Romo and Witten would be lynched by his team's fans.....and rightly so.

Yeah seriously. Other answers were pretty solid. Like many of us, he thought Atogwe was a good fit. I really hope we sign Huff or Weddle.
 
If Tyron Smith crosses his "T" and dots his "I" at his pro day at USC, I really think that Dallas will draft him if Peterson, Dareus, and Fairley are off the board and Dallas stays at 9.

Tyron Smith blocked Cameron Jordan as a true 20 year old junior (while needing to get stronger and add some weight) and really did very well and more than held his own, especially in the run game. Smith has more upside than Jordan and replaces Dallas' weakest player on offense and is cut out of the D'Brickashaw Ferguson mold at LT. He should be the number 1 rated OT when April rolls around.

If it comes down to Smith, Jordan, or Watt, I predict that Jason Garrett (an offensive coach) will put his foot down at Valley Ranch and pick Smith. It really shouldn't be a debate (when comparing those 3 players horizontally against one another or vertically on Dallas' roster) unless some at Valley Ranch actually want to play another year with Colombo at RT or put bets on a 6th round pick, who isn't the greatest athlete.

The top OTs will be long gone by pick 40, long gone.


Enough is enough.
 
I really thought the Atogwe opportunity was very good. I also think Michael Huff would be ideal and expensive. I don't understand why they let Atogwe go without even a visit. I broke him down with the Rams and he seemed to be just what the doctor ordered.

Don't worry, Bob.

Plenty of options still out there.

No need to reach for a reasonably-priced, proven veteran when you can sit on your thumb and see what shakes out.
 
4. How many owners would have kept Jerry on as their GM for the last 15 years? --Duane

1. Jerry Jones.


100% correct.:lmao2:
 
41gy#;3868982 said:
If Tyron Smith crosses his "T" and dots his "I" at his pro day at USC, I really think that Dallas will draft him if Peterson, Dareus, and Fairley are off the board and Dallas stays at 9.

Tyron Smith blocked Cameron Jordan as a true 20 year old junior (while needing to get stronger and add some weight) and really did very well and more than held his own, especially in the run game. Smith has more upside than Jordan and replaces Dallas' weakest player on offense and is cut out of the D'Brickashaw Ferguson mold at LT. He should be the number 1 rated OT when April rolls around.

If it comes down to Smith, Jordan, or Watt, I predict that Jason Garrett (an offensive coach) will put his foot down at Valley Ranch and pick Smith. It really shouldn't be a debate (when comparing those 3 players horizontally against one another or vertically on Dallas' roster) unless some at Valley Ranch actually want to play another year with Colombo at RT or put bets on a 6th round pick, who isn't the greatest athlete.

The top OTs will be long gone by pick 40, long gone.


Enough is enough.

I'm not sold on the strategy of taking an OT at #9.

IMO, Free is the LAST player who needs to be replaced on the OL, not the first.

Drafting Smith at #9 introduces a long-term problem. It is difficult to keep two starting caliber LTs on the same team. They are expensive. Free is a capable LT and he'll be paid as one. By virtue of his high draft position, Smith will be highly paid too. Jerry won't pay LT money to his RT for very long.

I guess I don't see how drafting an LT so high makes much sense when the Cowboys already have a capable one on their roster.
 
ZeroClub;3869127 said:
I'm not sold on the strategy of taking an OT at #9.

IMO, Free is the LAST player who needs to be replaced on the OL, not the first.

Drafting Smith at #9 introduces a long-term problem. It is difficult to keep two starting caliber LTs on the same team. They are expensive. Free is a capable LT and he'll be paid as one. By virtue of his high draft position, Smith will be highly paid too. Jerry won't pay LT money to his RT for very long.

I guess I don't see how drafting an LT so high makes much sense when the Cowboys already have a capable one on their roster.

Reasonable point but avoiding Smith for your reasons starts looking very much like "drafting backups." :eek:

In reality I suspect the deal Smith would get at #9 (probably 5 years or so)would not be near equivalent to the deal that Free or anothet top LT would get as their 2nd contract. So I don't think you'd be faced with your scenario for 5 years or so.

I just don't think you can let Smith pass for the reason you gave.
 
ZeroClub;3869127 said:
I'm not sold on the strategy of taking an OT at #9.

IMO, Free is the LAST player who needs to be replaced on the OL, not the first.

Drafting Smith at #9 introduces a long-term problem. It is difficult to keep two starting caliber LTs on the same team. They are expensive. Free is a capable LT and he'll be paid as one. By virtue of his high draft position, Smith will be highly paid too. Jerry won't pay LT money to his RT for very long.

I guess I don't see how drafting an LT so high makes much sense when the Cowboys already have a capable one on their roster.

I don't think it's about replacing Free.

I just think it's about finding the best combo of LT/RT that you can find as Free can play either one.

And no matter what position is drafted at #9, that player is getting the same money.

Either way you look at it, Free will get his and so will #9. It's not a matter of how much, it's a matter of where does it go? Does it go to one of the most needed positions or do you ignore a huge problem because of some sense of allocation issues?

I go with whatever helps the team the most.
 
Love this thread!
This guy nails it pretty well, imo.
 
tomson75;3868266 said:
Any GM that would take Austin or Ratliff over Romo and Witten would be lynched by his team's fans.....and rightly so.

Agreed :eek:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,371
Messages
14,533,421
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top