Bob's Blog-Dallas @ NO week 10 - Decoding Callahan

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Decoding Callahan - Week 10 - At New Orleans

"Rob Ryan is kicking their butt right now" - Chris Collinsworth, NBC

Around the game of football, there are certain weeks where the result is just so disastrous that looking at the film seems pointless and masochistic. Throw it in the trash or burn it! Nothing can be learned from that debacle.

That is likely true, but it would not make for a very informative blog post. So, while I agree that writing about the offense today and the defense tomorrow will be a repetitive exercise in issuing failing grades, I think it is worthwhile to examine the rubble before we move along to something a bit more salvageable.

The historic differences in this game are certainly rare in the game of professional football. High School games see this sort of thing on a regular basis and sometimes, it creeps into college, but rarely, if ever, has the NFL ever seen a yardage difference of 400 yards. When the Saints out gained the Cowboys, 625-193, it constituted one of the most one-sided avalanches in the history of the sport.

So, perhaps in the interest of making a historical record of the horrors we saw on Sunday, here is a list of the lows that the offense provided for us in their powerless attack:

FIRST DOWNS: There are reports everywhere marveling at the Saints setting the all-time 1st Down record, but that is something to discuss tomorrow. Today, we look at the Cowboys 9 1st Downs with equal amazement. October 26, 2003 was the last time the Cowboys had a total this low in the offensive 1st Down category when they also had just 9 in a 16-0 loss against Tampa Bay in first year of Bill Parcells and with Quincy Carter at the helm. On that day, they were playing a Bucs team that had no offense either and were only out gained by about 80 yards - not 432.

3RD DOWN CONVERSIONS: You certainly cannot do worse on 3rd Down than the Cowboys did on Sunday night as an offense. They went 0-9 and looked absolutely helpless. As we mentioned yesterday, they are now the worst team in the NFL on 3rd Downs on the road, and 30th overall on the "money down". This is absolutely going to be their undoing unless it can be sorted out quickly. From a historical perspective, 0 conversion nights, while rare, have happened on several occasions in Cowboys history, but since they started keeping these in the statistical archives in 1991, it has happened 4 times. You will not be surprised to find out that all 4 times they have taken the 0, they have lost comfortably: December 21, 2002, they lost in Philadelphia, 27-3. December 30, 2007, they were drilled in Washington, 27-6, as they rested their starters. October 25, 2010, they lost to the Giants by a deceivingly close final score of 41-35, in a game best remembered for losing Tony Romo for the year. And then, this game on November 10, 2013 in New Orleans.


http://sturminator.blogspot.com
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Three and outs is the staple of Garrett's offense... Too much pressure for Tony Romo to consistently keep the chains moving in these down and distances. If it weren't for Romo, we'd be three and out a lot more...
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Three and outs is the staple of Garrett's offense... Too much pressure for Tony Romo to consistently keep the chains moving in these down and distances. If it weren't for Romo, we'd be three and out a lot more...

Wasn't happy with the play calling but after a quick look the play calling wasn't as bad as I thought. It was the execution and Romo was a part of the problem. Haven't seen it all myself yet though.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
I love this vague term execution... "Hey a WR is open... Romo didn't execute.." It doesn't matter that the WR was the fourth or fifth in progression and the defense is reacting based upon them looking at The QB scanning his WRs according to his progressions and WR routes are running right into the teeth of a defense..
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
I love this vague term execution... "Hey a WR is open... Romo didn't execute.." It doesn't matter that the WR was the fourth or fifth in progression and the defense is reacting based upon them looking at The QB scanning his WRs according to his progressions and WR routes are running right into the teeth of a defense..

So you're going to dump on it without me even stating what play(s) I was looking at. However, since no one looking from the outside knows the plays and progressions then you can't say with certainty what Romo should have done; one way or the other. However, when enough people, not including me, say there was problems then you have to look at it with a more critical eye.
 

1LoyalCowboyFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
463
Wasn't happy with the play calling but after a quick look the play calling wasn't as bad as I thought. It was the execution and Romo was a part of the problem. Haven't seen it all myself yet though.

Interesting! I'm always quick to blame play calling. What would our offense be like if we had Payton?! Man I really like Payton lol
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Interesting! I'm always quick to blame play calling. What would our offense be like if we had Payton?! Man I really like Payton lol

Take this with a grain of salt because I've yet to see all the film. In fact I'm watching the news right now! So I've only sampled some with my own eyes and some pics of a few plays. You can cherry pick a few plays and make anyone look bad or good. The only reason I said something is because my eyes during the game said the play calling might be a major problem (and I'm certain some was) and Romo was not great but not that bad either. Now I don't know what to think other than we looked bad and the score looked bad. There are at least two threads here on the subject. Take a look at them.
 

nalam

The realist
Messages
11,911
Reaction score
7,157
I love this vague term execution... "Hey a WR is open... Romo didn't execute.." It doesn't matter that the WR was the fourth or fifth in progression and the defense is reacting based upon them looking at The QB scanning his WRs according to his progressions and WR routes are running right into the teeth of a defense..

1st get a line which can give 4-5 secs every time the QB wants to scan the progressions and then blame Romo.

Until then he needs to be given benefit of doubt, the drop of from Waters to Mac is evident in pass protection.
Leary has found a wrong time to stink it up and Free, who was unbelievable in the 1st half has started to show problems
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Third and long distance is a staple of this Garrett offense. It has been even when Romo was playing his best ball. This is the bread and butter of Garrett's offense.
 

Mr Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,612
Reaction score
32,654
They locked down on Bryant and never had to adjust to the Cowboys. There was no creativity, no rhythm, and seemingly, very little logic put into the play-calling.
I think Bob reads this board, I've been sayint this for quite a while!
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Third and long distance is a staple of this Garrett offense. It has been even when Romo was playing his best ball. This is the bread and butter of Garrett's offense.

Yep. And why we are inconsistent on offense, why Romo has to carry the offense, and why Romo makes mistakes at time trying to make something happen.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Yep. And why we are inconsistent on offense, why Romo has to carry the offense, and why Romo makes mistakes at time trying to make something happen.

And this is why I'm kind of amazed some people don't see it. If Tony Romo protects the ball and desn't take risks, then we are stuck with consistently turning the ball over on downs. It is when time becomes a factor and the offense is forced to take risks, do the chains move. And then, it's total make or break with Romo. You can't expect phenomenal play by him every game. It's not sustainable for any great QB to make plays contiually outside the system. This is why we always see the infamous, sometimes Romo is great and sometimes he kills you argument... I honestly feel bad for him, considering we haven't seen an offense that caters towards his skills... It's like a "what could have been" thing with him...
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
And this is why I'm kind of amazed some people don't see it. If Tony Romo protects the ball and desn't take risks, then we are stuck with consistently turning the ball over on downs. It is when time becomes a factor and the offense is forced to take risks, do the chains move. And then, it's total make or break with Romo. You can't expect phenomenal play by him every game. It's not sustainable for any great QB to make plays contiually outside the system. This is why we always see the infamous, sometimes Romo is great and sometimes he kills you argument... I honestly feel bad for him, considering we haven't seen an offense that caters towards his skills... It's like a "what could have been" thing with him...

I get mystified at times, too. Trying to set the run up against NO was a great idea as long as it was used briefly to set the pass up. We needed to outscore NO with that defense.
 
Top