Bob's Blog: Shotgun to the Head: Ignoring the Stats Leads to Failure

Dodger

Indomitable
Messages
4,216
Reaction score
43
Sunday, December 06, 2009

Shotgun to the Head: Ignoring the Stats Leads to Failure


First off, I'd like to introduce myself to all the Bob's Blog readers out there. My name is Josh Hixson. I'm a writer by trade here in Dallas (mostly non-sports stuff) and have been eating, sleeping and breathing football since the age of seven. Bob has graciously allowed me to share a few of my hot sports opinions on this here blog and for that I am extremely appreciative.

Now for the good stuff: If you follow Bob on Twitter (@bobanddan) then you probably noticed someone ask him earlier in the week if Tony Romo would be as effective a quarterback as Drew Brees has been this year in Sean Payton's offense. Bob answered with a question: something to the effect of "Do you think Tony Romo is as accurate as Drew Brees?"

The implied meaning there is that Brees is a smart and efficient passer, while Romo is known for being a Favre-esque gunslinger.

Is Brees just that much better than Romo that he can lead his team to victory every week with the accuracy and strength of his arm?

The short answer is not really.

When you look at the two quarterbacks using passing stats from Football Outsiders (the most usable and accurate out there IMHO) Brees is ranked higher in both DYAR (5th) and DVOA (2nd) than Romo (DYAR 9th, DVOA 10th).

Their simple explanation for this complicated calculation of a Quarterback's passing ability is explained simply this way: "DYAR means a quarterback with more total value. DVOA means a quarterback with more value per play."

Comparatively Brady, Manning and Favre are in the top five of both DVOA and DYAR this year through week 12.

But when you look at interceptions — a commonly used quarterback accuracy indicator — it may surprise some that Drew Brees (9 INTs), Peyton Manning (11 INTs) and Tom Brady (8 INTs) all have thrown more interceptions so far this season than Tony Romo (7 INTs). My point here is that if you only base QB accuracy on number of interceptions, then you're not getting the whole picture. What is the whole picture?: A quarterback's passing effectiveness as evidenced by DVOA and DYAR.

Now for the real shocker: When it comes to the elite passing teams in the NFL, it's less about about what the quarterback does and more about what the offensive line and offensive coordinator are doing.

It's also a common misconception that the running game sets up the passing game. Running the ball will only help the passing game if the formations, motions and backfield movements look similar for both running plays and passing plays because the defense keys on tendencies in formation and backfield movement. It's why Peyton Manning (Manning has the option to run or pass on every play) is such a dangerous play caller at the line of scrimmage and it's why Jason Garrett's ridiculous use of the shotgun is stifling the Cowboy's passing game.

If you can't get positive yardage running the ball out of shotgun, then you're telegraphing every play you run out of that formation. The numbers don't lie in this regard either.

New Orleans and Dallas are one and two respectively when it comes to run blocking, according to Football Outsiders. But when it comes to pass protection, New Orleans is 5th with 15 sacks given up through week 12 and Dallas is 19 with 25 sacks. Dallas' O-line aren't terrible pass blockers. It's just that their coordinator doesn't believe in the advantage of surprise.

When you fail to run play-action passes, or use formations that are friendly to the PAP, then you force your quarterback to deal with a defense that knows exactly what is coming when you set up in shotgun.

Running forces defensive lineman to fill a gap and occupy that space as the play develops in order to be effective, while passing the ball allows the d-line to drive straight for the quarterback with reckless abandon, depending on their assignment (if they aren't spying or dropping back into coverage).

And the statistics bare this out: Pat Yasinkas' Oct. 15 post on how Drew Brees has a 127.1 passer rating in the shotgun formation is no fluke. Yasinkas notes that at the time the Saints were only using shotgun 24.72 percent of the time, or 6th lowest in the league.

Conversely, in the week 10 loss to the Giants, Jason Garrett called for the shotgun formation (S11) 37 out of a total 58 plays.

When you abuse the shotgun you are asking to be blitzed, hurried, sacked and intercepted. It's like chumming a shark-infested pool before jumping in to swim a lap. The odds aren't with you that you're going to survive that lap whole.

As I write this, the Cowboys are losing to the New York football giants 31-17 with more than five minutes left in the in the 4th quarter. Jason Garrett has the Cowboys in the shotgun formation for the umpteenth time today and even Troy Aikman says on the air that Garrett will call a pass play.

The odds are against the Cowboys winning this game and in every other game when they run the shotgun religiously. Why Jason Garrett fails to recognize this could be a complete disregard for the stats or a general lack of faith in the play fakes. Either way, if this continues course it will lead to Garrett's labeling as a failure in the NFL.

Follow me on Twitter at @J_Hix

Posted by Josh Hixson at 2:48 PM





I gotta say, I pretty much agree with most of what I'm reading here. And even though it didn't seem to hurt too much last Sunday, I've been pretty concerned for weeks about the amount of plays in which we see the shotgun formation.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
The Dodger;3129368 said:
Running the ball will only help the passing game if the formations, motions and backfield movements look similar for both running plays and passing plays because the defense keys on tendencies in formation and backfield movement.

It's why Peyton Manning (Manning has the option to run or pass on every play) is such a dangerous play caller at the line of scrimmage and it's why Jason Garrett's ridiculous use of the shotgun is stifling the Cowboy's passing game.



When you fail to run play-action passes, or use formations that are friendly to the PAP, then you force your quarterback to deal with a defense that knows exactly what is coming when you set up in shotgun.

Yasinkas notes that at the time the Saints were only using shotgun 24.72 percent of the time, or 6th lowest in the league.

Conversely, in the week 10 loss to the Giants, Jason Garrett called for the shotgun formation (S11) 37 out of a total 58 plays.


When you abuse the shotgun you are asking to be blitzed, hurried, sacked and intercepted. It's like chumming a shark-infested pool before jumping in to swim a lap. The odds aren't with you that you're going to survive that lap whole.


The odds are against the Cowboys winning this game and in every other game when they run the shotgun religiously. Why Jason Garrett fails to recognize this could be a complete disregard for the stats or a general lack of faith in the play fakes. Either way, if this continues course it will lead to Garrett's labeling as a failure in the NFL.

I challenge anybody on this board to refute the bolded points. Spin away Garrett apologists.

And yes I realize the ST's and the Defense caved in, along with 2 missed fg's and Barbers fumble changing the momentum of the game...
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
Looking at Bobs breakdown, we ran 44 out of 79 total plays from a shotgun formation.

Garrett would be more suited in college.
 

malbis030347

Active Member
Messages
425
Reaction score
220
I could not agree more...is there some way this data can be sent on to the Cowboys staff for them to at least look at and maybe see things from a different perspective for a change..?
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Cochese;3129400 said:
Looking at Bobs breakdown, we ran 44 out of 79 total plays from a shotgun formation.

Garrett would be more suited in college.

37 out of 58 in one game LOL..:banghead:
 

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
I missed the part where he explains why the Cowboys are the #3 offense in the league.

Someone help me out here.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
187beatdown;3129428 said:
I missed the part where he explains why the Cowboys are the #3 offense in the league.

Someone help me out here.


In yards, not points, which again was the problem on sunday. And please dont forget that the offense was good before Ginger showed up.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Cochese;3129400 said:
Looking at Bobs breakdown, we ran 44 out of 79 total plays from a shotgun formation.

Garrett would be more suited in college.

3 of those came with 19 seconds left in the half.

21 more came in the 4th quarter when we were down and needed to move the ball. And WE DID MOVE THE BALL, WITH THE SHOTGUN.

287 yards total with shotgun. 6.5 yards per play.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Temo;3129443 said:
3 of those came with 19 seconds left in the half.

21 more came in the 4th quarter when we were down and needed to move the ball. And WE DID MOVE THE BALL, WITH THE SHOTGUN.


287 yards total with shotgun. 6.5 yards per play.
It's called prevent defense....
 

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
Cochese;3129436 said:
In yards, not points, which again was the problem on sunday. And please dont forget that the offense was good before Ginger showed up.

So what, it's Garrett's fault that the defense kept making them have to get into a shootout? Did Garrett make Bennett drop the ball? Did Garrett make Barber fumble the ball?

Romo had 3 touchdowns with ZERO interceptions and by losing the game even despite that, it is somehow related to the offense? As far as I'm concerned, the way they ran blitz all game, why not pass as much as he did?

You aren't an NFL coach, and I doubt this blog writer is either.
 

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,006
Reaction score
3,896
The Dodger;3129368 said:
...even though it didn't seem to hurt too much last Sunday...

It did hurt Sunday. It the crap pounded out of the Cowboys' QB. The only thing that prevented the G-strings from racking up more sacks was Tony Romo's amazing pocket presence.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
nyc;3129390 said:
It's a crying shame Jerry ran Dan Reeves off.

Actually to me its starting to look like more of a shame that wade and stewart wouldnt allow capers to be hired.

Knowing what is coming in 5 weeks or hopefully later, we will be left searching for a defensive coordinator when we could have already had one in house.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
VACowboy;3129458 said:
It did hurt Sunday. It the crap pounded out of the Cowboys' QB. The only thing that prevented the G-strings from racking up more sacks was Tony Romo's amazing pocket presence.

If Romo wasn't so good at scrambling Garrett would have been tar'd and feathered in this town two years ago....:laugh2:
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,116
Reaction score
11,471
I have asked this before, and none of the pass-happy shotgun fans have answered.

Passing the ball all the time is obviously the way to rack up yards and even points. So why run the ball at all? Ever? Why not become Texas Tech, or a run-and-shoot team from the 80s? After all, they put up incredible stats.

It's a legitimate philosophical question: Why not pass every down?

I want someone to explain to me why coaches like Bill Parcells are wrong in their approach.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
But, but... He runs the same offense as Norv does...
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
187beatdown;3129453 said:
So what, it's Garrett's fault that the defense kept making them have to get into a shootout? Did Garrett make Bennett drop the ball? Did Garrett make Barber fumble the ball?

Romo had 3 touchdowns with ZERO interceptions and by losing the game even despite that, it is somehow related to the offense? As far as I'm concerned, the way they ran blitz all game, why not pass as much as he did?

You aren't an NFL coach, and I doubt this blog writer is either.
So you're saying that Garrett is infallible?
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Chocolate Lab;3129465 said:
I have asked this before, and none of the pass-happy shotgun fans have answered.

Passing the ball all the time is obviously the way to rack up yards and even points. So why run the ball at all? Ever? Why not become Texas Tech, or a run-and-shoot team from the 80s? After all, they put up incredible stats.

It's a legitimate philosophical question: Why not pass every down?

I want someone to explain to me why coaches like Bill Parcells are wrong in their approach.

Because running the ball burns time and ices victories.
Because running the ball is more effective in short yardage situations.
Because running the ball prevents all-out pass defenses (like the 6 and 7 DB base defenses that the '07 Pats faced)

Parcells isn't wrong, I fail to see where I would imply that. I'm not saying that we shouldn't run. Just saying that we're running enough.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
khiladi;3129452 said:
It's called prevent defense....

Right, so can we toss out those 21 shotgun formations since they came at a time when time was running short and we were facing prevent defenses then? So then we really didn't run a lot of shotgun at all, did we?
 
Top