stilltheguru88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,737
- Reaction score
- 6,243
Why is Bosa the supposed cowboys target and not Lawson? Lawson looks much more dynamic
Never even seen Lawson mentioned in the 1st rounds anywhere. Going to look him up.
Kiper has him 10 to NYG
Didn't realize his first name was shaq I have seen him in a lot of mocks actually. Around 10-20 picked.
Lawson struggles with the stop start and that means he is poor at coming off blocks.
No one has made more defensive plays in the past two years then Bosa. Bosa was double and triple teamed as he was gameplanned every game by opposing OC. Lawson not so much.
Show me where he is double teamed much less tipple teamed. Maybe against some small schools. Go watch Michigan St in 2014 and 2015
Lawson looks like a slug in the championship game but he had a knee injury. That is not a good thing.
Here he is against FSU where he got hurt and Miami before hurt and he looks less flexible and less explosive off the line as opposed to Bosa. It becomes very evident when he has to redirect and he looks heavy footed.
Forget measurables. Lawson makes more plays.
Laughable.
Shaq Lawson Career stats: 40 games, 20 sacks, 45.4 TFL, 1 FF, 123 TOT
Joey Bosa Career Stats: 38 games, 26 sacks, 51 TFL, 5 FF, 1 INT, 148 TOT
Yeah, he makes more plays...
Lets examine 2015 and who's trending in which direction.
Lawson 12.5 sacks and 24.5 TFL 1 FF
Bosa 5 sacks and 16 TFL 1FF
The trend is your friend. I know Lawson played in three more games but had a breakout season and is seemingly progressing while Bosa regressing.
Lawson had Dodd on the defensive line with him and essentially came out of nowhere this season. Bosa was the premier pass rusher in college football coming into the season and on a defensive line with no one else rushing the passer. Saying Bosa is "regressing" is about as self serving as it gets.
You can look at things within a vacuum and disguise it by calling it a trend, but the reality is you're ignoring how the game of football actually works in order to support your weak argument.
I'll just cut my losses right now. you clearly have absolutely no intention of having a valid debate.