Boston Celtics are great model for our offense

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
This offense has so many weapons...

Miles Austin
Dez Bryant
Roy Williams
Jason Witten
Martellus Bennett
Felix Jones
Marion Barber
Tashard Choice

we need players to play roles though out games, and with that this is going to be a frightening offense.

felix jones might not have 2000 yards rushing, martellus bennett might not have 500 yards receiving...

we just need people to beat their guy, and help romo out on every play
 
I am missing your point.

Boston doesn't play good offense. They scored 89 tonight and that's not far from the norm.

They do play good defense (borderline dirty) however. They play defense like the Ravens. Physical, hard-nosed and intimidating
 
basketball is stupid and unwatchable in the regular season. shut up.
 
T-RO;3411491 said:
I am missing your point.

Boston doesn't play good offense. They scored 89 tonight and that's not far from the norm.

They do play good defense (borderline dirty) however. They play defense like the Ravens. Physical, hard-nosed and intimidating

I think the point he was trying to make is that their starting 5 all had 10+ points. I think he was trying to say that we might not have that 30point player, even though the talent is there. We've got too much talent. Like Boston having 4 future HoF'ers. We might just have a Win-by-Team method. Which I love.
 
T-RO;3411491 said:
I am missing your point.

Boston doesn't play good offense. They scored 89 tonight and that's not far from the norm.

They do play good defense (borderline dirty) however. They play defense like the Ravens. Physical, hard-nosed and intimidating
They scored 94 pts after sitting their starters with 5 min left in the game. Won the game by 23 pts and you don't see the point. :rolleyes:

They also have several players that can take over the game at any different time. You wouldn't want your offense to be like that. :rolleyes:
 
I went to a restaurant and ordered chicken and an egg because I wanted to see which one came first.
 
sureletsrace;3411530 said:
I think the point he was trying to make is that their starting 5 all had 10+ points. I think he was trying to say that we might not have that 30point player, even though the talent is there. We've got too much talent. Like Boston having 4 future HoF'ers. We might just have a Win-by-Team method. Which I love.

Thanks for understanding EXACTLY what I meant.
 
The only thing even remotely exciting about watching basketball, is the last 5 minutes of a deciding playoff game (as in a game 7). The rest of the game is garbage and doesn't matter. Basketball would be more entertaining if it was just one 10 minute quarter per game.

Ooo, its' 21-14, I think I'll nap for an hour because I know the game is going to end 70+ -70+ and all the crap in between doesn't matter, at all. If you only watch the last 5 minutes of a basketball game, you miss nothing.

I think I might have gone off topic. My apologies.

This thread would have been better without the basketball reference in the title.
 
Boston went from the BIG 3 to the Big 4.

I agree. They play their parts well individually which makes for a great team effort.




Boston will beat the Lakers. I guarantee it.
 
The development of the point guard Rhondo to argueably the #1 PG in the NBA has been something......for sure top 3.

......from a guy the coach called uncoachable to the top at his position has been something to watch.........

Dont know if they can beat the Lakers.....but they match up well enough---and they play D, big time D, can match up to Gasol, but Kobe is a load.
 
Thats what happens when u have 4 of 5 of ur starters all stars.
I would still vote for lakers. Just to much length up front.
Anyone here who is ragging on hoops never played obviously.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,693
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top