BPA vs. BPA for need...

trickblue

Not Old School...Old Testament...
Messages
31,439
Reaction score
3,961
I am not happy with our second round pick... those in chat know this, but I keep hearing BPA... he was the BPA...

Let's examine BPA... let's say that Fasano rated on a scale of 10... an 8.5... and Ko Simpson rated and 8.3 (I am not advocating Simpson, this is a scientific experiment)... Is taking BPA really justified as you have needs with a player closely comparable?

Why would you take a player at which you have a pro-bowler? I don't get this pick AT ALL... and I have been a draft junkie for 30+ years...

You can never judge a draft on it's face until 2-3 years, but this one seems crappy right off the bat... I like Carpenter mind you. but many players we needed were still available...

It sounds as if we don't plan on re-signing Witten...
 
Top