IronGut;3256440 said:
If Favre were our QB vs the Vikes he finds a way to beat that pass rush ..he finds a way to will a W. Did you see the toughness he displayed in the face of heat ? He got up an played his guts out he even survived a dirty hit late in the game that would have snapped Romo.
Really? He would have found a way to beat the pass rush? Then why pray tell did the "Great and Powerful Farve" toss up not one but two picks in the second half inside his own 30. The second of which cost his team a chance at a game winning FG. If Romo had done that, you would be screaming at the top of your lungs for Romo to be cut, traded, released, all of the above. Since however you are defending Favre in all his purple glory for doing what you would kill Romo for, I have to assume you maybe have some kind of sick Barney fetish. That is the ONLY way your post even remotely makes since. I'm not sayin, I'm just sayin.
And stifle yourselves if you think Favre lost that game, they outplayed the Aints all day Adrian Peterson lost that game. Truth be told; Monny should have won by 10. Yes Favre blew it late but he was trying to make a play. With out talent we go 14 n 2 with Brett and were playing next Sunday. Truthfully we'd be playing next Sunday if our QB was McNabb.
Yea, Favre lost that game. Fumbled inside his own five when he can't give his running back the ball on a handoff for God's sake and the aformentioned interceptions. Favre's a gunslinger. He'll win games for you by being a gunslinger but he'll lose many as well. Should have won by ten? Not if you give it away 5 times. Oh and FYI, neither of Peterson's fumbles were recovered by New Orleans. The Vikes actually scored on one of the drives where he fumbled. So, tell us all again how it was Peterson who gave away the game and not Favre.
:laugh2:
