Brian Broadus: Tank Johnson part of the cancer in the lockerroom

dadymat

I'm kind of a Big Deal
Messages
6,023
Reaction score
1
sacase;2543324 said:
What exactly has Pac done to be a bad guy in the locker room. Did I not read something he did in the locker room (barring his BS suspension)

he let the team down..........at the time we needed him most he was suspended.............
 

RoadRunner

New Member
Messages
2,809
Reaction score
0
I am pretty sure Jimmy would have cut Pacman just for the kickoff return fumble right before the half that let Philly get a cheap three as time expired.
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
2,612
dadymat;2543330 said:
he let the team down..........at the time we needed him most he was suspended.............

Ok gotcha, so basically he has done nothing bad in the lockeroom.
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
2,612
RoadRunner;2543469 said:
I am pretty sure Jimmy would have cut Pacman just for the kickoff return fumble right before the half that let Philly get a cheap three as time expired.

So he would have cut barber as well? Romo to for his fumbles and pick 6's that cost us games.

Jeeze people its time to get out of the past and live in the present.
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
Chocolate Lab;2542409 said:
We know he doesn't want to come back, but I'd announce right now (or leak it) that we don't want him back.

And Broaddus is exactly right (I heard most of that this afternoon, too) that these young kids don't need to see bad examples like Tank. It's the same with Jenkins and Scandrick watching Pacman. Did you hear the part about how Flozell picked up some bad habits from the way Larry Allen blew off meetings and hated to practice?


You are exaclty right. I'm counting down the hours until these idiots are out of here. Jerry Jones better wake up. Scandrick and Jenkins are watching Owens, too.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,857
Reaction score
112,779
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yeagermeister;2542971 said:
Tank and Pacman shouldn't be allowed back in to VR. Just Fedex them their stuff and be done with them both.
That is a great idea. I completely agree. Nothing like sending a message that cancers will be shown the door and not tolerated any more.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
What the hell? Did a player actually say Tank was a problem or was this complete speculation based on the guy having spent time in jail? How is he a "cancer?"

I don't get why Tank gets lumped into the same mold as Pacman, who's a thug that's apparently too stupid to grow up. I don't get that at all from Tank.
 

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
RainMan;2542492 said:
This is one of the biggest question marks I currently have about our organization.

Sure, we're going to luck out and not have Tank return, but largely because he's a free agent and doesn't want to return.

I can't say I have any confidence, though, that this organization can locate the rats and, more importantly, then have the gumption to kick them out. I'd love to be proven wrong.

Exactly right.
 
Messages
4,316
Reaction score
1
This guy is an idiot....

Tank might have underachieved in a 3-4 but he will be a beast in a 4-3.

And as far as him being a cancer?

Kind of amusing as he was loved by his Bears teamates.
 

AmishCowboy

if you ain't first, you're last
Messages
5,134
Reaction score
569
Tank's a 4-3 tackle that we tryed to make a NG out of, no big loss IMO, however he should be thankful that Jerry gave him a 2nd chance and revived his Career. I thought Pacman Played decently at CB but was no way as good as Advertised at PR, if he too much of a distraction to Jenkins and Scandrick then let me go, as far as those two around Owens let them pick up his work ethic, Conditioning and will too win.
 

Wrangler87

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,178
Reaction score
123
Nothing I haven't said in the past. I would have never signed Tank, Pacman, or Owens, for that matter.

As much as I love the Cowboys, I like the Giants "team" more. If I could trade 52 for 52, I'd do it in a heart beat.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
RoadRunner;2543469 said:
I am pretty sure Jimmy would have cut Pacman just for the kickoff return fumble right before the half that let Philly get a cheap three as time expired.
Pacman made a damn fine play on the Westbrook fumble in the first quarter. Not that it turned out to matter much. But let's not forget that just because he had a bad one afterwards.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,640
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
theogt;2543701 said:
What the hell? Did a player actually say Tank was a problem or was this complete speculation based on the guy having spent time in jail? How is he a "cancer?"

I don't get why Tank gets lumped into the same mold as Pacman, who's a thug that's apparently too stupid to grow up. I don't get that at all from Tank.
RE: Tank. I would've thought it was speculation initially, too if he hadn't been so happy at the end of the game about becoming a FA. Plus I've read that he's been griping about PT, as well. So, it's not impossible that he's been making some noise in there.

Re: Pac. He got suspended. But overall, I haven't heard anything negative about his lockerroom habits. I think people misjudged his potential on-field impact this year, tho, so there might be some let down.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,504
Reaction score
12,524
Everything I read about Pacman was that he was great in the locker room and on the practice field. His only problem all season was the little scuffle with the body guard.

He played some excellent CB for Dallas, and I would be shocked if we didn't bring him back, considering what he brings us for the money. He was certainly one of our better defenders when on the field, and he'll only be better next season, having shaken the rust off.

I don't see where he did anything to be a distraction beyond that one little scuffle, and he not only accepted responsibility but also got alcohol counseling.

If you were against his signing due to his past from the beginning, then I can see you still not wanting him. But if you forgot his past and welcomed him, why would you want to get rid of him now? Because he fumbled a ko return in a lopsided final game?
 
Messages
4,316
Reaction score
1
wayne motley;2544290 said:
Everything I read about Pacman was that he was great in the locker room and on the practice field. His only problem all season was the little scuffle with the body guard.

He played some excellent CB for Dallas, and I would be shocked if we didn't bring him back, considering what he brings us for the money. He was certainly one of our better defenders when on the field, and he'll only be better next season, having shaken the rust off.

I don't see where he did anything to be a distraction beyond that one little scuffle, and he not only accepted responsibility but also got alcohol counseling.

If you were against his signing due to his past from the beginning, then I can see you still not wanting him. But if you forgot his past and welcomed him, why would you want to get rid of him now? Because he fumbled a ko return in a lopsided final game?


Pacman might be our best corner and he hasn't peaked like Newman.

IF he can keep his head on straight, he will be our best next year.
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
McCordsville Cowboy;2544316 said:
Pacman might be our best corner and he hasn't peaked like Newman.

IF he can keep his head on straight, he will be our best next year.

You have got to be kidding me.
 
Top