sacase;2543324 said:What exactly has Pac done to be a bad guy in the locker room. Did I not read something he did in the locker room (barring his BS suspension)
dadymat;2543330 said:he let the team down..........at the time we needed him most he was suspended.............
RoadRunner;2543469 said:I am pretty sure Jimmy would have cut Pacman just for the kickoff return fumble right before the half that let Philly get a cheap three as time expired.
Chocolate Lab;2542409 said:We know he doesn't want to come back, but I'd announce right now (or leak it) that we don't want him back.
And Broaddus is exactly right (I heard most of that this afternoon, too) that these young kids don't need to see bad examples like Tank. It's the same with Jenkins and Scandrick watching Pacman. Did you hear the part about how Flozell picked up some bad habits from the way Larry Allen blew off meetings and hated to practice?
That is a great idea. I completely agree. Nothing like sending a message that cancers will be shown the door and not tolerated any more.Yeagermeister;2542971 said:Tank and Pacman shouldn't be allowed back in to VR. Just Fedex them their stuff and be done with them both.
RainMan;2542492 said:This is one of the biggest question marks I currently have about our organization.
Sure, we're going to luck out and not have Tank return, but largely because he's a free agent and doesn't want to return.
I can't say I have any confidence, though, that this organization can locate the rats and, more importantly, then have the gumption to kick them out. I'd love to be proven wrong.
Pacman made a damn fine play on the Westbrook fumble in the first quarter. Not that it turned out to matter much. But let's not forget that just because he had a bad one afterwards.RoadRunner;2543469 said:I am pretty sure Jimmy would have cut Pacman just for the kickoff return fumble right before the half that let Philly get a cheap three as time expired.
RE: Tank. I would've thought it was speculation initially, too if he hadn't been so happy at the end of the game about becoming a FA. Plus I've read that he's been griping about PT, as well. So, it's not impossible that he's been making some noise in there.theogt;2543701 said:What the hell? Did a player actually say Tank was a problem or was this complete speculation based on the guy having spent time in jail? How is he a "cancer?"
I don't get why Tank gets lumped into the same mold as Pacman, who's a thug that's apparently too stupid to grow up. I don't get that at all from Tank.
wayne motley;2544290 said:Everything I read about Pacman was that he was great in the locker room and on the practice field. His only problem all season was the little scuffle with the body guard.
He played some excellent CB for Dallas, and I would be shocked if we didn't bring him back, considering what he brings us for the money. He was certainly one of our better defenders when on the field, and he'll only be better next season, having shaken the rust off.
I don't see where he did anything to be a distraction beyond that one little scuffle, and he not only accepted responsibility but also got alcohol counseling.
If you were against his signing due to his past from the beginning, then I can see you still not wanting him. But if you forgot his past and welcomed him, why would you want to get rid of him now? Because he fumbled a ko return in a lopsided final game?
McCordsville Cowboy;2544316 said:Pacman might be our best corner and he hasn't peaked like Newman.
IF he can keep his head on straight, he will be our best next year.