gtb1943
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,500
- Reaction score
- 18,927
I heard it was the opposite; one chick refusing to vote guiltyOh, I thought it was going to be about some chick snuffing out 3 of her kids and almost getting away with it except for the courage of one real man on the jury
Her defense attorney tried to get the man eliminated from the jury because he was the lone hold out from aquiting the chick exterminatorI heard it was the opposite; one chick refusing to vote guilty
Well I would not believe an attorney if he told me day was day and night was nightHer defense attorney tried to get the man eliminated from the jury because he was the lone hold out from aquiting the chick exterminator
It was just one man that didn’t fold under the pressure.Well I would not believe an attorney if he told me day was day and night was night
hard to believe everyone else thought she was innocent
Prosecution screwed the pooch on jury selection.It was just one man that didn’t fold under the pressure.
Maybe they should spend more time slowing down the rape gangs.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/04/us-news/lindsay-clancy-defense-confirms-holdout-juror-is-male/Well I would not believe an attorney if he told me day was day and night was night
hard to believe everyone else thought she was innocent
gotta wonder exactly what the UK Police are doing? do not care about rape gangs; allow beer to be stolen, just what good ARE they?Maybe they should spend more time slowing down the rape gangs.
Then again, 70k pints is a lot...lol
Like I said, defense attorneys chief occupation is to lie
Agree.......prosecutors do too.Like I said, defense attorneys chief occupation is to lie
BUT in court it could get interestingOne further point to make.
If hormonal fluctuation and "mental state of mind" is now a "get out of jail free" card for a woman, will those same folks that assert this keep that same energy when a man with PTSD offs his family?
I think we all know the answer to that....
Also, if a woman's "hormonal imbalance is now "disqualifier" for actions do we really want to see them as a president with the finger on the button or to be a good steward of power?BUT in court it could get interesting
companies saying they cannot have personnel that might shoot someone on a bad day and point to this case
unintended consequences are always interesting I have heard that some in jail for polygamy are looking to get their convictions for it over turned since multiple partnerships are considered marriageAlso, if a woman's "hormonal imbalance is now "disqualifier" for actions do we really want to see them as a president with the finger on the button or to be a good steward of power?
Can't have it both ways.
Just one humble man's questions
