Brooks Bollinger

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
BJ is by far a headier and better player than Brooks at this point.
 

rynochop

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,763
Reaction score
4,657
Boy i'm tired of seeing passing td's by the opposition with Roy ALWAYS 4 steps behind.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Hoofbite;2351911 said:
Hes been on the team a month. He is a developmental guy. Do you honestly think he could be starting?

I'd rather have a 6 year "Developmental" guy playing than a 60 year relic. What an embarrassment!!!:eek:::eek:::eek::


And hasn't he been on the team for 2 months? Heck RW is getting some reps and he's been on the team for 5 minutes....:spanking:
 

Rounder

New Member
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
:banghead:
CowboyFan74;2352667 said:
I'd rather have a 6 year "Developmental" guy playing than a 60 year relic. What an embarrassment!!!:eek:::eek:::eek::


And hasn't he been on the team for 2 months? Heck RW is getting some reps and he's been on the team for 5 minutes....:spanking:

Here Here!!! Brooks' play wouldn't hurt the team any further.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
big dog cowboy;2352923 said:
Let me see if I understand.........you want a no-name development QB that has been on the roster for a month starting over a QB that won a super bowl 5 years ago?

Are you watching the Dallas Cowboy game from today???:insane:
 

Word Mofo

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,083
Reaction score
454
Isn't Brooks the 3rd emergency QB after Brad and Tony? That would mean he can't play unless both go down.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Word Mofo;2353239 said:
Isn't Brooks the 3rd emergency QB after Brad and Tony? That would mean he can't play unless both go down.

Brad is not a QB, somebody call the police!!!!:mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
Top