Brooks Bollinger

BJ is by far a headier and better player than Brooks at this point.
 
Boy i'm tired of seeing passing td's by the opposition with Roy ALWAYS 4 steps behind.
 
Hoofbite;2351911 said:
Hes been on the team a month. He is a developmental guy. Do you honestly think he could be starting?

I'd rather have a 6 year "Developmental" guy playing than a 60 year relic. What an embarrassment!!!:eek:::eek:::eek::


And hasn't he been on the team for 2 months? Heck RW is getting some reps and he's been on the team for 5 minutes....:spanking:
 
:banghead:
CowboyFan74;2352667 said:
I'd rather have a 6 year "Developmental" guy playing than a 60 year relic. What an embarrassment!!!:eek:::eek:::eek::


And hasn't he been on the team for 2 months? Heck RW is getting some reps and he's been on the team for 5 minutes....:spanking:

Here Here!!! Brooks' play wouldn't hurt the team any further.
 
big dog cowboy;2352923 said:
Let me see if I understand.........you want a no-name development QB that has been on the roster for a month starting over a QB that won a super bowl 5 years ago?

Are you watching the Dallas Cowboy game from today???:insane:
 
Isn't Brooks the 3rd emergency QB after Brad and Tony? That would mean he can't play unless both go down.
 
Word Mofo;2353239 said:
Isn't Brooks the 3rd emergency QB after Brad and Tony? That would mean he can't play unless both go down.

Brad is not a QB, somebody call the police!!!!:mad::mad::mad::mad:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,862
Messages
13,901,503
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top