Browns are considering drafting 2 QBs high

[Verdict]

That might be a decent scenario for the Browns. On top of that, it might really make teams around them sweat profusely.

 

[Jake]

That might be a decent scenario for the Browns. On top of that, it might really make teams around them sweat profusely.

That would be...interesting.

 

[erod]

That is not entirely crazy.

If you don't have a QB, you don't have a chance. The Browns haven't had one since Bernie Kosar.

Draft two, hope you hit on both, then flip one of them for a king's ransom in draft picks.

Again, not stupid at all.

But if I'm them, I grab Saquon Barkely at #1, then hope Baker Mayfield is there at #4.

 

[G2]

They have a long history of screwing the pooch in regard to QBs. Might as well screw up twice.

 

[Mobinvans]

That would be hilarious

 

[phildadon86]

They have a long history of screwing the pooch in regard to QBs. Might as well screw up twice.

I would like this more than once if I could lol

 

[Stash]

 

[Teague31]

Only the Browns

 

[JBS]

It's a brilliant idea...they would be stupid not to do it

 

[KLJ]

But if I'm them, I grab Saquon Barkely at #1, then hope Baker Mayfield is there at #4.

i would do the same.

 

[Shinaoi]

I can’t see which everyone they choose to trade at a later date being more valuable than the pick is now.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I think it's moronic. Not that high. You draft a qb in the top 5 he should be a franchise qb. If you don't have enough faith in the guy then why waste the pick?

 

[Sydla]

LOL.

The Browns.

My guess is they go ahead and take Josh Allen, falling in love with his tools, when in fact, he's probably not much different than the guy they traded to GB - Kizer.

 

[Tangle_Foot]

That might be a decent scenario for the Browns. On top of that, it might really make teams around them sweat profusely.

If that's the case wouldn't they draft a "Right Guard"

 

[vaturkey]

When RGIII was drafted the Commanders drafted Kirk Cousins in the 4th round that same year.

 

[Stash]

LOL.

The Browns.

My guess is they go ahead and take Josh Allen, falling in love with his tools, when in fact, he's probably not much different than the guy they traded to GB - Kizer.

It's almost like they intentionally do this stuff. How can any franchise be this dumb on a consistant basis?

Even when they have a great player sitting there for them, they manage to screw it up!

Two years ago, they had to do nothing and draft Carson Wentz, but nope, they have to screw that up.

Then they follow it up with drafting Kizer last year, starting him when he wasn't ready, and then giving up on him after just one season and giving him away to Green Bay!

You can't make this stuff up!

 

[Idgit]

No, they’re investigating the market for trading down with their second top five pick.

 

[DCowboyz]

I'll draft that RB at 1 and their franchise QB at 4. The Browns have a chance to actually become a very good team in a few years if they do well this draft. Something like what the 76ers have done in Philly.. Even though I hate them.

 

[DFWJC]

That might be a decent scenario for the Browns. On top of that, it might really make teams around them sweat profusely.

No they are not going to draft two QBs high.

The only reason a smart GM (which is what they finally have) feed that to a gullible press member is so maybe another GM will offer a fortune for one the high picks.

Now, would they do what Washington did years ago and maybe take one early and one in the mid to late rounds? Sure

 

[rags747]

That is not entirely crazy.

If you don't have a QB, you don't have a chance. The Browns haven't had one since Bernie Kosar.

Draft two, hope you hit on both, then flip one of them for a king's ransom in draft picks.

Again, not stupid at all.

But if I'm them, I grab Saquon Barkely at #1, then hope Baker Mayfield is there at #4.

That would really F the Giants plans.