Brunell's likely the key to next year's Commanders

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Brunell's likely the key to next year's Commanders
By Connor J. Byrne on June 6, 2006 12:26 AM

The Washington Commanders may have a great defense and legitimate offensive firepower, but their quarterback position has been the cause of some concern for the team's fans. Their starter from last year, Mark Brunell, is holding the job down as of now. However, he recently fractured his finger and will be sidelined for most of this month. In Brunell's absence, second-year man Jason Campbell and veteran Todd Collins will take the snaps during the Commanders' June workouts.

Assuming Brunell regains his health and maintains Washington's starting job, the onus will be on him in 2006 to help guide the Commanders to their second consecutive playoff appearance. Brunell pleasantly surprised most in the football world last year, throwing 23 touchdowns en route to the Commanders' 10-6 finish, which included five straight victories to end the regular season.

Thanks to Washington's top-notch defense and Brunell's steady play, the Commanders rose from the dead to win a wild card spot. They took out the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in the first round of the playoffs, then fought valiantly in Round Two against the eventual NFC champs, the Seattle Seahawks , and lost. Still, Brunell established a new sense of confidence that he wasn't simply a flash in the pan, as many believed him to be.

Thanks to the fact that Brunell will be 36 this September and his body's obviously wearing down, many are questioning how he'll do in '06. What's not helping was his somewhat pedestrian playoff performance over two games, when he completed 29-of-52 passes for 283 yards, along with a touchdown and an interception. Now, those numbers aren't terrible, but they leave something to be desired.

Although Brunell's clearly not at optimum physical condition, don't count him out next season. After all, the Commanders' offensive weapons will do plenty in helping him duplicate his success of last season. The 'Skins made a concerted effort this offseason to improve their offense, acquiring receivers Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd. Both are somewhat undersized, but make for a promising duo behind the team's ace wideout from '05, Santana Moss. Along with that capable receiving trio comes underrated tight end Chris Cooley, who finished with 71 receptions last year.

Also helping to take the load off Brunell will be running back Clinton Portis. Last season, Portis, a four-year veteran, rushed for over 1,500 yards for the third time in his already stellar career. There's little doubt that Portis will continue his torrid pace into next season, especially behind the Commanders' offensive line, led by Jon Jansen and Chris Samuels, two bookend tackles.

However, all the weapons in the league won't matter if a team doesn't have a proper coordinator, but the Commanders more than took care of that. Adding onto its busy offseason, Washington's biggest move may have been luring offensive coordinator Al Saunders from the Kansas City Chiefs . The Commanders threw some big dollars at the 59-year-old, who previously orchestrated tremendous offenses for the Chiefs. Under Saunders Brunell should flourish, as veteran QB Trent Green constantly did with Kansas City.

The final factor in Brunell's favor that should come into play is the Commanders' previously mentioned defense. Thanks to the genius of coordinator Gregg Williams, the unit has become among the most feared in the NFL. Because of the defense's brilliance, Brunell won't have any pressure on him to put up Peyton Manning-esque offensive numbers. In fact, all he really needs to do is avert turnovers, handoff to Portis, fling the ball and let his talented wideouts and tight ends handle the rest. Doesn't sound so tough, does it?

Even though the Washington Commanders ' overall team talent seems nearly limitless, it doesn't mean next season will be all fun and games for Brunell. If he begins playing like a washed-up veteran, head coach Joe Gibbs may be forced to turn to Campbell, who's never attempted a pass in his young career. Perhaps that would turn out well, but young quarterbacks usually perform disastrously.

Disaster relief will be Brunell's game in the next campaign. How will he handle it? We'll all find out soon enough.
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
The title to the article is right on the money....
Brunell is the key....if he can play all season and does play all season...the skins have as good a chance as anyone to win the division, I don't think Campbell can do it and I really don't think he'll ever amount to a solid starting NFL QB. I couldn't believe they did what they did to draft him in the first round. The first thought in my head was...their version of QC.
 

DGreenFan87

New Member
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
ghst187 said:
The title to the article is right on the money....
Brunell is the key....if he can play all season and does play all season...the skins have as good a chance as anyone to win the division, I don't think Campbell can do it and I really don't think he'll ever amount to a solid starting NFL QB. I couldn't believe they did what they did to draft him in the first round. The first thought in my head was...their version of QC.

i definitely agree that our offense can be as good as it wants to be, but without brunell we're not gonna be much.

in all honesty, i believe jason campbell can be a good starting QB (obvious bias there). i don't know why you feel that he can't ever be a starting QB, but we'll never know until he actually plays. so while we can debate this all we want, we'll just have to wait and see.
 

Gent

New Member
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
We've got a similar concern. Bledsoe isn't much younger than Brunell and he takes too many hits.

-Gent
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
DGreenFan87 said:
i definitely agree that our offense can be as good as it wants to be, but without brunell we're not gonna be much.

in all honesty, i believe jason campbell can be a good starting QB (obvious bias there). i don't know why you feel that he can't ever be a starting QB, but we'll never know until he actually plays. so while we can debate this all we want, we'll just have to wait and see.

I thought he was a good college QB but he was good only because:
1) he had Cadillac and Ronnie Brown
2) he had an amazing defense
3) he didn't have to make very many throws for them to win
4) he was good at managing the game and limiting his mistakes

I'm a skeptic of his because I question his ability to throw the ball downfield accurately and consistently. Just never got the feeling that he had starting NFL-QB talent.
I watched Auburn a LOT his last year there and I'm not trying to hate on the skins or anything, I just never saw Campbell as a starting NFL QB. I always saw him as a decent backup at best and it has nothing to do with who drafted him. Just my honest assessment. I imagine we'll find out at some point fairly soon if I'm right or wrong.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,957
Reaction score
8,174
Gryphon said:
then fought valiantly in Round Two against the eventual NFC champs, the Seattle Seahawks , and lost.

Really? Producing the lowest offensive output total ever in the playoffs against a defense that isn't even considered remotely close to other great defenses in the past is fighting valiantly?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,894
Reaction score
112,881
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Gent said:
We've got a similar concern. Bledsoe isn't much younger than Brunell and he takes too many hits.
You mean he used to. Those days are over. His sack total goes way down this year.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Gent said:
We've got a similar concern. Bledsoe isn't much younger than Brunell and he takes too many hits.

-Gent

well unlike Brunell, Bledsoe has shown that he can take a beating and keep on going
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
Key for Wash...Brunell
Key for NYG...Tiki Barber
Key for Phlly..McNabb's play, his WR's, and the RB position
Key for Dallas...OL
 

MossBurner

New Member
Messages
505
Reaction score
0
Why are there so many articles about Brunell's age and fragility? There are many other 'old' QBs in the league, yet they receive no such negative attention.

Brunell 35
T Green 35
Favre 36
Bledsoe 33
B Johnson 37
Warner 34
McNair 33
K Collins 33
Garcia 36
Kitna 33

Mark played great last season. He only received a nagging knee injury at the end of last season by an illegal hit - Nick Greisen tackled him by the knees in week 16. The Skins offense stunk in the playoffs last season because two strong defenses figured out how to concentrate on Santana and take him out of the game, not because Brunell slowed down. Teams won't be able to double and triple him on every play this year. Mark will be fine.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Favre and Bledsoe hardly ever miss time, frailty and their names don't belong in the same sentence
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Only a skins homer would not look at Brunnells past record on injuries. Only a skins homer would not look at late season and see that he wore down.
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
MossBurner said:
Why are there so many articles about Brunell's age and fragility? There are many other 'old' QBs in the league, yet they receive no such negative attention.

Brunell 35
T Green 35
Favre 36
Bledsoe 33
B Johnson 37
Warner 34
McNair 33
K Collins 33
Garcia 36
Kitna 33

Mark played great last season. He only received a nagging knee injury at the end of last season by an illegal hit - Nick Greisen tackled him by the knees in week 16. The Skins offense stunk in the playoffs last season because two strong defenses figured out how to concentrate on Santana and take him out of the game, not because Brunell slowed down. Teams won't be able to double and triple him on every play this year. Mark will be fine.
He slowed down as the season progressed, not just in the playoffs. No 200+ passing yard games after the 10th game. I think thats more of what people are talking about. Aslo a 36 year old QB who has played 28 games in the last 3 seasons is bothersome.
 

DC Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,868
Reaction score
1,305
ghst187 said:
I thought he was a good college QB but he was good only because:
1) he had Cadillac and Ronnie Brown
2) he had an amazing defense
3) he didn't have to make very many throws for them to win
4) he was good at managing the game and limiting his mistakes

I'm a skeptic of his because I question his ability to throw the ball downfield accurately and consistently. Just never got the feeling that he had starting NFL-QB talent.
I watched Auburn a LOT his last year there and I'm not trying to hate on the skins or anything, I just never saw Campbell as a starting NFL QB. I always saw him as a decent backup at best and it has nothing to do with who drafted him. Just my honest assessment. I imagine we'll find out at some point fairly soon if I'm right or wrong.


I am a die hard Boys fan and could care less but you make no sense at all. All the reasons you just mentioned are the same reasons they gave for Burnell to have a good year. Skinz have a good running back, good defense,you said he was good at managing the game? so tell me what's your point or real reason you don't feel he would be a starting QB in the NFL?
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
If he stays healthy all s eason the Skins will be in it. BUT what is his record for playing 16 games a season?
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
burmafrd said:
If he stays healthy all s eason the Skins will be in it. BUT what is his record for playing 16 games a season?
Recently, not that good.
 

DGreenFan87

New Member
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
while brunell's age and injury prone-ness are definitely factors in why he didn't last last season, i don't think that that was the only factor, nor the biggest factor. i think in the end of the season, we had nobody for brunell to throw it to. by the close of the season many teams were catching on to the fact that santana was his #1 target. he started geting covered hard and we all know we didn't have much talent at WR after moss. portis was getting banged up and although i think he's one hell of a soldier, he couldn't carry the load as well as he could in the beginning of the season. and cooley, basically our only other option, was getting owned after our second game against you guys. so with no options to throw to, brunell couldn't get the stats. so while everyone blames his age for his stats slipping at the end of last season, remember that there are more things that contribute to how well a QB plays than his own abilities.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Key is: he is not anywhere near as sturdy as Bledsoe is; so its much more likely that he will get injured and miss games.
 
Top